Literature DB >> 25606581

Clinical performance of serum [-2]proPSA derivatives, %p2PSA and PHI, in the detection and management of prostate cancer.

Ya-Qiang Huang1, Tong Sun2, Wei-De Zhong3, Chin-Lee Wu4.   

Abstract

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been widely used as a serum marker for prostate cancer (PCa) screening or progression monitoring, which dramatically increased rate of early detection while significantly reduced PCa-specific mortality. However, a number of limitations of PSA have been noticed. Low specificity of PSA may lead to overtreatment in men who presenting with a total PSA (tPSA) level of < 10 ng/mL. As a type of free PSA (fPSA), [-2]proPSA is differentially expressed in peripheral zone of prostate gland and found to be elevated in serum of men with PCa. Two p2PSA-based derivatives, prostate health index (PHI) and %p2PSA, which were defined as [(p2PSA/fPSA) × √ tPSA] and [(p2PSA/fPSA) × 100] respectively, have been suggested to be increased in PCa and can better distinguish PCa from benign prostatic diseases than tPSA or fPSA. We performed a systematic review of the available scientific evidences to evaluate the potentials of %p2PSA and PHI in clinical application. Mounting evidences suggested that both %p2PSA and PHI possess higher area under the ROC curve (AUC) and better specificity at a high sensitivity for PCa detection when compare with tPSA and %fPSA. It indicated that measurements of %p2PSA and PHI significantly improved the accuracy of PCa detection and diminished unnecessary biopsies. Furthermore, elevations of %p2PSA and PHI are related to more aggressive diseases. %p2PSA and PHI might be helpful in reducing overtreatment on indolent cases or assessing the progression of PCa in men who undergo active surveillance. Further studies are needed before being applied in routine clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  %p2PSA; PHI; PSA; [-2]proPSA; biopsy; prostate cancer

Year:  2014        PMID: 25606581      PMCID: PMC4297331     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol        ISSN: 2330-1910


  41 in total

1.  [-2]Proenzyme prostate specific antigen is more accurate than total and free prostate specific antigen in differentiating prostate cancer from benign disease in a prospective prostate cancer screening study.

Authors:  Brian V Le; Christopher R Griffin; Stacy Loeb; Gustavo F Carvalhal; Donghui Kan; Nikola A Baumann; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Alvaro Páez; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Sigrid Carlsson; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Paula M Kujala; Bert G Blijenberg; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Andreas Huber; Kimmo Taari; Matti Hakama; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Serum index test %[-2]proPSA and Prostate Health Index are more accurate than prostate specific antigen and %fPSA in predicting a positive repeat prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Massimo Lazzeri; Alberto Briganti; Vincenzo Scattoni; Giovanni Lughezzani; Alessandro Larcher; Giulio Maria Gadda; Giuliana Lista; Andrea Cestari; Nicolòmaria Buffi; Vittorio Bini; Massimo Freschi; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Giorgio Guazzoni
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives significantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml: a multicentric European study.

Authors:  Massimo Lazzeri; Alexander Haese; Alexandre de la Taille; Joan Palou Redorta; Thomas McNicholas; Giovanni Lughezzani; Vincenzo Scattoni; Vittorio Bini; Massimo Freschi; Amy Sussman; Bijan Ghaleh; Philippe Le Corvoisier; Josep Alberola Bou; Salvador Esquena Fernández; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Performance of serum prostate-specific antigen isoform [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) and the prostate health index (PHI) in a Chinese hospital-based biopsy population.

Authors:  Rong Na; Dingwei Ye; Fang Liu; Haitao Chen; Jun Qi; Yishuo Wu; Guiming Zhang; Meilin Wang; Wenying Wang; Jielin Sun; Guopeng Yu; Yao Zhu; Shancheng Ren; S Lilly Zheng; Haowen Jiang; Yinghao Sun; Qiang Ding; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  Serum pro-prostate specific antigen preferentially detects aggressive prostate cancers in men with 2 to 4 ng/ml prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Georg Bartsch; Harry G Rittenhouse; Cindy L Evans; Harry J Linton; Wolfgang Horninger; Helmut Klocker; Stephen D Mikolajczyk
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Pathological outcomes in men with low risk and very low risk prostate cancer: implications on the practice of active surveillance.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Eric JohnBull; Bruce J Trock; Patricia Landis; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The impact of baseline [-2]proPSA-related indices on the prediction of pathological reclassification at 1 year during active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: the Japanese multicenter study cohort.

Authors:  Hiromi Hirama; Mikio Sugimoto; Kazuto Ito; Taizo Shiraishi; Yoshiyuki Kakehi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  [-2]proPSA is an early marker for prostate cancer aggressiveness.

Authors:  I Heidegger; H Klocker; E Steiner; V Skradski; M Ladurner; R Pichler; G Schäfer; W Horninger; J Bektic
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 5.554

View more
  12 in total

1.  Validity of Prostate Health Index and Percentage of [-2] Pro-Prostate-Specific Antigen as Novel Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Omani Tertiary Hospitals Experience.

Authors:  Safana S Al Saidi; Nafila B Al Riyami; Mohammed S Al Marhoon; Mohammed S Al Saraf; Salim S Al Busaidi; Riad Bayoumi; Waad-Allah S Mula-Abed
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-07

Review 2.  Semen as a rich source of diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer: latest evidence and implications.

Authors:  Chenyu Mao; Yongfeng Ding; Nong Xu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 3.  Prostasomes as a source of diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Carla Zijlstra; Willem Stoorvogel
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  The burden of prostate cancer is associated with human development index: evidence from 87 countries, 1990-2016.

Authors:  Rajesh Sharma
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 6.543

5.  PRECISION MANAGEMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER.

Authors:  David J VanderWeele; Baris Turkbey; Adam G Sowalsky
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-12-12

6.  Development and external validation of a prostate health index-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Cheng-Tao Han; Gui-Ming Zhang; Fang Liu; Qiang Ding; Jian-Feng Xu; Adriana C Vidal; Stephen J Freedland; Chi-Fai Ng; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effect of body mass index on the performance characteristics of PSA-related markers to detect prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Cheng-Tao Han; Gui-Ming Zhang; Fang Liu; Qiang Ding; Jian-Feng Xu; Adriana C Vidal; Stephen J Freedland; Chi-Fai Ng; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Somatic Mutation Analyses in Studies of the Clonal Evolution and Diagnostic Targets of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Dmitry S Mikhaylenko; Gennady D Efremov; Vladimir V Strelnikov; Dmitry V Zaletaev; Boris Y Alekseev
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.236

9.  Performance of the Prostate Health Index in predicting prostate biopsy outcomes among men with a negative digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Guo-Peng Yu; Rong Na; Ding-Wei Ye; Jun Qi; Fang Liu; Hai-Tao Chen; Yi-Shuo Wu; Gui-Ming Zhang; Jie-Lin Sun; Yao Zhu; Li-Qun Huang; Shan-Cheng Ren; De-Ke Jiang; S Lilly Zheng; Hao-Wen Jiang; Ying-Hao Sun; Qiang Ding; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Influence of age on seven putative prostate tumor markers: a cohort study in Chinese men.

Authors:  Wei-Gui Sun; Chao-Zhao Liang; Qi-Chuan Zheng; Xiao-Wu Hu; Zhi-Zhen Li; Ping Wu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.