Literature DB >> 25176131

Performance of serum prostate-specific antigen isoform [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) and the prostate health index (PHI) in a Chinese hospital-based biopsy population.

Rong Na1, Dingwei Ye, Fang Liu, Haitao Chen, Jun Qi, Yishuo Wu, Guiming Zhang, Meilin Wang, Wenying Wang, Jielin Sun, Guopeng Yu, Yao Zhu, Shancheng Ren, S Lilly Zheng, Haowen Jiang, Yinghao Sun, Qiang Ding, Jianfeng Xu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of serum [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) and its derivative, the prostate health index (PHI), in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) have been consistently shown to have better performance than total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) in discriminating biopsy outcomes in western countries. However, little is known about their performance in Chinese men. Our objective is to test the performance of p2PSA and PHI and their added value to tPSA in discriminating biopsy outcomes in Chinese men.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent prostate biopsy in three tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China during 2012-2013 were recruited. Serum tPSA, free PSA (fPSA), and p2PSA were measured centrally using Beckman Coulter's DxI 800 Immunoassay System. The primary outcome is PCa and the secondary outcome is high-grade PCa (Gleason Score of 4 + 3 or worse). Discriminative performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), detection rate and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA).
RESULTS: Among 636 patients who underwent prostate biopsy, PHI was a significant predictor of biopsy outcomes, independent of other clinical variables. The AUC in discriminating PCa from non-PCa was consistently higher for PHI than tPSA in the entire cohort (0.88 vs. 0.81) as well as in patients with tPSA at 2-10 ng/ml (0.73 vs. 0.53), at 10.1-20 ng/ml (0.81 vs. 0.58), and at tPSA >20 ng/ml (0.90 vs. 0.80). The differences were statistically significant in all comparisons, P < 0.01. To detect 90% of all PCa in the cohort, 362 and 457 patients would need to be biopsied based on PHI and tPSA cutoff, respectively, a 21% reduction for PHI. Similar results were found for discriminating high-grade PCa.
CONCLUSIONS: PHI provides added value over tPSA in discriminating PCa and high-grade PCa in patients who underwent prostate biopsy in China.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PSA; [-2]proPSA (p2PSA); prostate cancer; prostate health index (PHI); receiver operating curve (ROC)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25176131     DOI: 10.1002/pros.22876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  21 in total

Review 1.  Clinical performance of serum [-2]proPSA derivatives, %p2PSA and PHI, in the detection and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ya-Qiang Huang; Tong Sun; Wei-De Zhong; Chin-Lee Wu
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2014-12-25

2.  The modified prostate health index (PHI) outperforms PHI density in the detection of clinical prostate cancer within the PSA grey zone.

Authors:  Haojie Chen; Bowen Shi; Yanyuan Wu; Yuhang Qian; Jiatong Zhou; Xi Zhang; Jie Ding; Yongjiang Yu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Development and external validation of a prostate health index-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Cheng-Tao Han; Gui-Ming Zhang; Fang Liu; Qiang Ding; Jian-Feng Xu; Adriana C Vidal; Stephen J Freedland; Chi-Fai Ng; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Effect of body mass index on the performance characteristics of PSA-related markers to detect prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Cheng-Tao Han; Gui-Ming Zhang; Fang Liu; Qiang Ding; Jian-Feng Xu; Adriana C Vidal; Stephen J Freedland; Chi-Fai Ng; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Predictive value of [-2]propsa (p2psa) and its derivatives for the prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0ng/mL PSA range.

Authors:  I Vukovic; D Djordjevic; N Bojanic; U Babic; I Soldatovic
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 6.  Prostate cancer screening in Europe and Asia.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2016-09-04

7.  Prostate cancer in Asia: A collaborative report.

Authors:  Rui Chen; Shancheng Ren; Ming Kwong Yiu; Ng Chi Fai; Wai Sam Cheng; Lap Hong Ian; Seiji Naito; Tadashi Matsuda; Elijah Kehinde; Ali Kural; Jason Yichun Chiu; Rainy Umbas; Qiang Wei; Xiaolei Shi; Liqun Zhou; Jian Huang; Yiran Huang; Liping Xie; Lulin Ma; Changjun Yin; Danfeng Xu; Kexin Xu; Zhangqun Ye; Chunxiao Liu; Dingwei Ye; Xin Gao; Qiang Fu; Jianquan Hou; Jianlin Yuan; Dalin He; Tiejun Pan; Qiang Ding; Fengshuo Jin; Benkang Shi; Gongxian Wang; Xiuheng Liu; Dongwen Wang; Zhoujun Shen; Xiangbo Kong; Wanhai Xu; Yaoliang Deng; Haibo Xia; Alexa N Cohen; Xu Gao; Chuanliang Xu; Yinghao Sun
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2015-04-16

8.  Performance of the Prostate Health Index in predicting prostate biopsy outcomes among men with a negative digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Guo-Peng Yu; Rong Na; Ding-Wei Ye; Jun Qi; Fang Liu; Hai-Tao Chen; Yi-Shuo Wu; Gui-Ming Zhang; Jie-Lin Sun; Yao Zhu; Li-Qun Huang; Shan-Cheng Ren; De-Ke Jiang; S Lilly Zheng; Hao-Wen Jiang; Ying-Hao Sun; Qiang Ding; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Extended use of Prostate Health Index and percentage of [-2]pro-prostate-specific antigen in Chinese men with prostate specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Peter Ka-Fung Chiu; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Wai-Man Lee; Chi-Hang Yee; Eddie Shu-Yin Chan; See-Ming Hou; Chi-Fai Ng
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-08-31

10.  Influence of age on seven putative prostate tumor markers: a cohort study in Chinese men.

Authors:  Wei-Gui Sun; Chao-Zhao Liang; Qi-Chuan Zheng; Xiao-Wu Hu; Zhi-Zhen Li; Ping Wu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.