Literature DB >> 24165692

[-2]proPSA is an early marker for prostate cancer aggressiveness.

I Heidegger1, H Klocker1, E Steiner1, V Skradski1, M Ladurner1, R Pichler1, G Schäfer2, W Horninger1, J Bektic1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between preoperative [-2]proPSA, the Gleason Score (GS) and the risk of non-organ-confined (NOC) disease in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).
METHODS: Beckman Coulter Access immunoassay was used to study serum specimens of 381 patients enrolled in a prostate cancer (PCa) early detection program. Inclusion criteria were three or more available serum specimens over 4 years before diagnosis. The values obtained were correlated with the GSs and pathological stages of specimens obtained at RP.
RESULTS: [-2]proPSA levels were significantly higher in the cancer group (n=208) than in the benign group (n=173). Already 4 years before diagnosis [-2]proPSA differed significantly between PCa and benign prostate in all measured time points, however, highest prediction value was 2 and 1 years before diagnosis (P<0.001). When stratified [-2]proPSA levels according to GS of RP specimens, [-2]proPSA was highest in patients with ≥GS8 and lowest in those with ≤GS6.The difference in [-2]proPSA values between GS≥8 and GS≤7 was highly significant (P<0.01) already 3 years before diagnosis. Investigating the correlation between extraprostatic extension and the preoperative [-2]proPSA levels we found preoperative [-2]proPSA values significantly higher in men with NOC PCa compared with organ-confined (OC) cancers.The highest predictive value of [-2]proPSA to differ between OC and extraprostatic extension was found 3 and 2 years before RP.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high [-2]proPSA levels in the years before cancer diagnosis are at a higher risk of having aggressive PCas. Thus, the [-2]proPSA should be included in the treatment decision-making for managing screen-detected PCa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24165692     DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2013.50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  11 in total

Review 1.  Serum markers in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Ola Bratt; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 2.  Clinical and Novel Biomarkers in the Management of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Cristóbal Sanhueza; Manish Kohli
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-02-08

Review 3.  Next-generation prostate-specific antigen test: precursor form of prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Kazuto Ito; Yuji Fujizuka; Kiyohide Ishikura; Bernard Cook
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Clinical performance of serum [-2]proPSA derivatives, %p2PSA and PHI, in the detection and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ya-Qiang Huang; Tong Sun; Wei-De Zhong; Chin-Lee Wu
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2014-12-25

Review 5.  PSA and beyond: alternative prostate cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Sharanjot Saini
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 6.  Biomarkers in prostate cancer: what's new?

Authors:  David A Sartori; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 7.  Clinical use of [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) and its derivatives (%p2PSA and Prostate Health Index) for the detection of prostate cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alberto Abrate; Giovanni Lughezzani; Giulio Maria Gadda; Giuliana Lista; Ella Kinzikeeva; Nicola Fossati; Alessandro Larcher; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Francesco Mistretta; Nicolòmaria Buffi; Giorgio Guazzoni; Massimo Lazzeri
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-07-11

Review 8.  The Present and Future of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer: Proteomics, Genomics, and Immunology Advancements.

Authors:  Pierre-Olivier Gaudreau; John Stagg; Denis Soulières; Fred Saad
Journal:  Biomark Cancer       Date:  2016-05-05

9.  Comparative Study of Blood-Based Biomarkers, α2,3-Sialic Acid PSA and PHI, for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Montserrat Ferrer-Batallé; Esther Llop; Manel Ramírez; Rosa Núria Aleixandre; Marc Saez; Josep Comet; Rafael de Llorens; Rosa Peracaula
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Prostate Health Index and Prostate Health Index Density as Diagnostic Tools for Improved Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Marija Barisiene; Arnas Bakavicius; Diana Stanciute; Jolita Jurkeviciene; Arunas Zelvys; Albertas Ulys; Dalius Vitkus; Feliksas Jankevicius
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.