Literature DB >> 15126794

Serum pro-prostate specific antigen preferentially detects aggressive prostate cancers in men with 2 to 4 ng/ml prostate specific antigen.

William J Catalona1, Georg Bartsch, Harry G Rittenhouse, Cindy L Evans, Harry J Linton, Wolfgang Horninger, Helmut Klocker, Stephen D Mikolajczyk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pro forms of prostate specific antigen (PSA) have been reported to be more cancer specific markers of prostate cancer than total PSA and they also may preferentially detect the more aggressive forms of the disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Research immunoassays with high specificity for pro-PSA forms were used to study 1091 retrospective serum specimens, including 555 with 2 to 4 and 536 with 4 to 10 ng/ml PSA, from men enrolled in prostate cancer screening studies who underwent prostate biopsy.
RESULTS: In the 2 to 4 ng/ml PSA range the ratio of pro- to free-PSA (percent pro-PSA) using a cutoff of 1.8% for recommending prostate biopsy detected 90% of cancers, including 16 of 16 extracapsular tumors and 28 of 29 tumors with a pathology Gleason score of 7 or greater, while avoiding 19% of unnecessary biopsies. Serum percent pro-PSA was significantly increased for Gleason score 7 or greater vs less than 7 (p = 0.0018). In the PSA range of 4 to 10 ng/ml percent pro-PSA had the highest cancer specificity, avoiding 31% of unnecessary biopsies, while detecting 34 of 35 cancers with a pathology Gleason score of 7 or greater and 29 of 31 extracapsular tumors. Neither percent free PSA nor complexed PSA enhanced the detection of aggressive cancers in the 4 to 10 ng/ml PSA range.
CONCLUSIONS: Percent pro-PSA was superior to percent free and calculated complexed PSA for the detection of prostate cancer in the PSA range of 2 to 10 ng/ml and it had selectivity for detecting more aggressive cancers, as indicated by Gleason score 7 or greater and/or extracapsular tumor extension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15126794     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000127737.94221.3e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  34 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of operating characteristics of prostate cancer detection biomarkers.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Liang; Donna P Ankerst; Norma S Ketchum; Barbara Ercole; Girish Shah; John D Shaughnessy; Robin J Leach; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  [-2]Proenzyme prostate specific antigen is more accurate than total and free prostate specific antigen in differentiating prostate cancer from benign disease in a prospective prostate cancer screening study.

Authors:  Brian V Le; Christopher R Griffin; Stacy Loeb; Gustavo F Carvalhal; Donghui Kan; Nikola A Baumann; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Overdiagnosis and Lives Saved by Reflex Testing Men With Intermediate Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Todd M Morgan; Teresa A'mar; Sarah P Psutka; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Twenty Years of PSA: From Prostate Antigen to Tumor Marker.

Authors:  Gabriela De Angelis; Harry G Rittenhouse; Stephen D Mikolajczyk; L Blair Shamel; Axel Semjonow
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

Review 5.  Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Armando Stabile; Francesco Giganti; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja; Geert Villeirs; Inderbir S Gill; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore; Veeru Kasivisvanathan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  A prospective, multicenter, National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network study of [-2]proPSA: improving prostate cancer detection and correlating with cancer aggressiveness.

Authors:  Lori J Sokoll; Martin G Sanda; Ziding Feng; Jacob Kagan; Isaac A Mizrahi; Dennis L Broyles; Alan W Partin; Sudhir Srivastava; Ian M Thompson; John T Wei; Zhen Zhang; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Association of [-2]proPSA with biopsy reclassification during active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Stacy Loeb; Zhaoyong Feng; Sumit Isharwal; Patricia Landis; Debra J Elliot; Robert Veltri; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Bruce Trock; Lori J Sokoll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Diagnostic significance of [-2]pro-PSA and prostate dimension-adjusted PSA-related indices in men with total PSA in the 2.0-10.0 ng/mL range.

Authors:  Kazuto Ito; Mai Miyakubo; Yoshitaka Sekine; Hidekazu Koike; Hiroshi Matsui; Yasuhiro Shibata; Kazuhiro Suzuki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Pro-prostate-specific antigen measurements in serum and tissue are associated with treatment necessity among men enrolled in expectant management for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Sumit Isharwal; Lori J Sokoll; Patricia Landis; Cameron Marlow; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Screening for prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Peter T Scardino; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.