Literature DB >> 23375961

Serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives significantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml: a multicentric European study.

Massimo Lazzeri1, Alexander Haese, Alexandre de la Taille, Joan Palou Redorta, Thomas McNicholas, Giovanni Lughezzani, Vincenzo Scattoni, Vittorio Bini, Massimo Freschi, Amy Sussman, Bijan Ghaleh, Philippe Le Corvoisier, Josep Alberola Bou, Salvador Esquena Fernández, Markus Graefen, Giorgio Guazzoni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Strategies to reduce prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-driven prostate cancer (PCa) overdiagnosis and overtreatment seem to be necessary.
OBJECTIVE: To test the accuracy of serum isoform [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) and its derivatives, percentage of p2PSA to free PSA (fPSA; %p2PSA) and the Prostate Health Index (PHI)-called index tests-in discriminating between patients with and without PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was an observational, prospective cohort study of patients from five European urologic centers with a total PSA (tPSA) range of 2-10 ng/ml who were subjected to initial prostate biopsy for suspected PCa. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary end point was to evaluate the specificity, sensitivity, and diagnostic accuracy of index tests in determining the presence of PCa at prostate biopsy in comparison to tPSA, fPSA, and percentage of fPSA to tPSA (%fPSA) (standard tests) and the number of prostate biopsies that could be spared using these tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were complemented by predictive accuracy analysis and decision curve analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of >646 patients, PCa was diagnosed in 264 (40.1%). Median tPSA (5.7 vs 5.8 ng/ml; p=0.942) and p2PSA (15.0 vs 14.7 pg/ml) did not differ between groups; conversely, median fPSA (0.7 vs 1 ng/ml; p<0.001), %fPSA (0.14 vs 0.17; p<0.001), %p2PSA (2.1 vs 1.6; p<0.001), and PHI (48.2 vs 38; p<0.001) did differ significantly between men with and without PCa. In multivariable logistic regression models, p2PSA, %p2PSA, and PHI significantly increased the accuracy of the base multivariable model by 6.4%, 5.6%, and 6.4%, respectively (all p<0.001). At a PHI cut-off of 27.6, a total of 100 (15.5%) biopsies could have been avoided. The main limitation is that cases were selected on the basis of their initial tPSA values.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a tPSA range of 2-10 ng/ml, %p2PSA and PHI are the strongest predictors of PCa at initial biopsy and are significantly more accurate than tPSA and %fPSA.
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23375961     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  64 in total

Review 1.  Serum markers in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Ola Bratt; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 2.  The Prostate Health Index: a new test for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; William J Catalona
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2014-04

3.  Comparison Between the Four-kallikrein Panel and Prostate Health Index for Predicting Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Tobias Nordström; Andrew Vickers; Melissa Assel; Hans Lilja; Henrik Grönberg; Martin Eklund
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Prostate cancer: Prostate Health Index--improving screening in men with family history.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Differentiating Molecular Risk Assessments for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin Press; Michael Schulster; Marc A Bjurlin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

6.  Prostate transitional zone volume-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer and high progression prostate cancer in a real-world population.

Authors:  Yanqing Wang; Shaowei Xie; Xun Shangguan; Jiahua Pan; Yinjie Zhu; Zhixiang Xin; Fan Xu; Xiaoguang Shao; Liancheng Fan; Jianjun Sha; Qiang Liu; Baijun Dong; Wei Xue
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer screening between the ages of 55 and 69 years followed by active surveillance.

Authors:  Tiago M de Carvalho; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  The Prostate Health Index: Its Utility in Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Abbey Lepor; William J Catalona; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.241

9.  Serial Percent Free Prostate Specific Antigen in Combination with Prostate Specific Antigen for Population Based Early Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Donna Pauler Ankerst; Jonathan Gelfond; Martin Goros; Jesus Herrera; Andreas Strobl; Ian M Thompson; Javier Hernandez; Robin J Leach
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  PSA, PSA derivatives, proPSA and prostate health index in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sema Nur Ayyıldız; Ali Ayyıldız
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.