Literature DB >> 25582430

Audio-visual speech intelligibility benefits with bilateral cochlear implants when talker location varies.

Richard J M van Hoesel1.   

Abstract

One of the key benefits of using cochlear implants (CIs) in both ears rather than just one is improved localization. It is likely that in complex listening scenes, improved localization allows bilateral CI users to orient toward talkers to improve signal-to-noise ratios and gain access to visual cues, but to date, that conjecture has not been tested. To obtain an objective measure of that benefit, seven bilateral CI users were assessed for both auditory-only and audio-visual speech intelligibility in noise using a novel dynamic spatial audio-visual test paradigm. For each trial conducted in spatially distributed noise, first, an auditory-only cueing phrase that was spoken by one of four talkers was selected and presented from one of four locations. Shortly afterward, a target sentence was presented that was either audio-visual or, in another test configuration, audio-only and was spoken by the same talker and from the same location as the cueing phrase. During the target presentation, visual distractors were added at other spatial locations. Results showed that in terms of speech reception thresholds (SRTs), the average improvement for bilateral listening over the better performing ear alone was 9 dB for the audio-visual mode, and 3 dB for audition-alone. Comparison of bilateral performance for audio-visual and audition-alone showed that inclusion of visual cues led to an average SRT improvement of 5 dB. For unilateral device use, no such benefit arose, presumably due to the greatly reduced ability to localize the target talker to acquire visual information. The bilateral CI speech intelligibility advantage over the better ear in the present study is much larger than that previously reported for static talker locations and indicates greater everyday speech benefits and improved cost-benefit than estimated to date.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25582430      PMCID: PMC4368656          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0503-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  32 in total

1.  Binaural cochlear implants placed during the same operation.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Richard S Tyler; Jay T Rubinstein; Abigail Wolaver; Mary Lowder; Paul Abbas; Carolyn Brown; Michelle Hughes; John P Preece
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system.

Authors:  Joachim Müller; F Schön; J Helms
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant.

Authors:  P Schleich; P Nopp; P D'Haese
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer.

Authors:  Monica L Hawley; Ruth Y Litovsky; John F Culling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adult subjects with the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  Richard Ramsden; Paula Greenham; Martin O'Driscoll; Deborah Mawman; David Proops; Louise Craddock; Claire Fielden; John Graham; Leah Meerton; Carl Verschuur; Joseph Toner; Cecilia McAnallen; Jonathan Osborne; Maire Doran; Roger Gray; Margaret Pickerill
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Validation of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Ann E Perreau; Haihong Ji
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  The benefit of bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implantation to speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  John F Culling; Sam Jelfs; Alice Talbert; Jacques A Grange; Steven S Backhouse
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Stefan Kerber; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  10 in total

1.  Speech Understanding in Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants: Effects of Hearing Configuration, Source Location Certainty, and Head Movement.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Louise Loiselle; Sarah Natale; Sterling W Sheffield; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Mary S Dietrich; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Julie Liss; Shuai Wang; Visar Berisha; Cimarron Ludwig; Sarah Cook Natale
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Listeners Fit With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Spatial Release From Masking in Adults With Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Effects of Distracter Azimuth and Microphone Location.

Authors:  Timothy J Davis; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sterling W Sheffield; Iliza M Butera; René H Gifford; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Speech Understanding in Noise by Patients With Cochlear Implants Using a Monaural Adaptive Beamformer.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Sarah Natale; Anthony Spahr; Erin Castioni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Benefits of triple acoustic beamforming during speech-on-speech masking and sound localization for bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  David Yun; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Improving Localization and Speech Reception in Noise for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Wendy B Potts; Lakshmish Ramanna; Trevor Perry; Christopher J Long
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Effects of training and using an audio-tactile sensory substitution device on speech-in-noise understanding.

Authors:  K Cieśla; T Wolak; A Lorens; M Mentzel; H Skarżyński; A Amedi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Patient Benefit Following Bimodal CI-provision: Self-reported Abilities vs. Hearing Status.

Authors:  Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke; Tobias Balkenhol; Svetlana Hetjens; Nicole Rotter; Jerome J Servais
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.003

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.