Literature DB >> 28399064

Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Ryan A Stevenson1, Sterling W Sheffield, Iliza M Butera, René H Gifford, Mark T Wallace.   

Abstract

Speech perception is inherently a multisensory process involving integration of auditory and visual cues. Multisensory integration in cochlear implant (CI) recipients is a unique circumstance in that the integration occurs after auditory deprivation and the provision of hearing via the CI. Despite the clear importance of multisensory cues for perception, in general, and for speech intelligibility, specifically, the topic of multisensory perceptual benefits in CI users has only recently begun to emerge as an area of inquiry. We review the research that has been conducted on multisensory integration in CI users to date and suggest a number of areas needing further research. The overall pattern of results indicates that many CI recipients show at least some perceptual gain that can be attributable to multisensory integration. The extent of this gain, however, varies based on a number of factors, including age of implantation and specific task being assessed (e.g., stimulus detection, phoneme perception, word recognition). Although both children and adults with CIs obtain audiovisual benefits for phoneme, word, and sentence stimuli, neither group shows demonstrable gain for suprasegmental feature perception. Additionally, only early-implanted children and the highest performing adults obtain audiovisual integration benefits similar to individuals with normal hearing. Increasing age of implantation in children is associated with poorer gains resultant from audiovisual integration, suggesting a sensitive period in development for the brain networks that subserve these integrative functions, as well as length of auditory experience. This finding highlights the need for early detection of and intervention for hearing loss, not only in terms of auditory perception, but also in terms of the behavioral and perceptual benefits of audiovisual processing. Importantly, patterns of auditory, visual, and audiovisual responses suggest that underlying integrative processes may be fundamentally different between CI users and typical-hearing listeners. Future research, particularly in low-level processing tasks such as signal detection will help to further assess mechanisms of multisensory integration for individuals with hearing loss, both with and without CIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28399064      PMCID: PMC5570631          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  202 in total

1.  The effect of temporal asynchrony on the multisensory integration of letters and speech sounds.

Authors:  Nienke M van Atteveldt; Elia Formisano; Leo Blomert; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Early experience determines how the senses will interact.

Authors:  Mark T Wallace; Barry E Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Plasticity in bilateral superior temporal cortex: Effects of deafness and cochlear implantation on auditory and visual speech processing.

Authors:  Carly A Anderson; Diane S Lazard; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The detection of auditory visual desynchrony.

Authors:  N F Dixon; L Spitz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Effects of amplification and speechreading on consonant recognition by persons with impaired hearing.

Authors:  B E Walden; K W Grant; M T Cord
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Evaluating the articulation index for auditory-visual consonant recognition.

Authors:  K W Grant; B E Walden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Cross-modal reorganization and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  M E Doucet; F Bergeron; M Lassonde; P Ferron; F Lepore
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  Predicting cochlear implant outcome from brain organisation in the deaf.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Giraud; Hyo-Jeong Lee
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 9.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for neuroimaging in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Joe Saliba; Heather Bortfeld; Daniel J Levitin; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Spatial and temporal factors during processing of audiovisual speech: a PET study.

Authors:  E Macaluso; N George; R Dolan; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  15 in total

1.  Developmental Shifts in Detection and Attention for Auditory, Visual, and Audiovisual Speech.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Markus F Damian; Cassandra Karl; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Development of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Item Bank.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Cooperation between hearing and vision in people with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Multisensory Integration and the Society for Neuroscience: Then and Now.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Detection and Attention for Auditory, Visual, and Audiovisual Speech in Children with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Markus F Damian; Cassandra Karl; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Visual Reliance During Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users and Candidates.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Kara J Vasil; Christin Ray
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Does hearing aid use affect audiovisual integration in mild hearing impairment?

Authors:  Anja Gieseler; Maike A S Tahden; Christiane M Thiel; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Comparing Auditory-Only and Audiovisual Word Learning for Children With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Jena McDaniel; Stephen Camarata; Paul Yoder
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2018-10-01

9.  Validity and reliability of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments in comparison to legacy instruments.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Development of New Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Instruments for Adults.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2019-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.