Literature DB >> 28768324

Speech Understanding in Noise by Patients With Cochlear Implants Using a Monaural Adaptive Beamformer.

Michael F Dorman1, Sarah Natale1, Anthony Spahr1, Erin Castioni2.   

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this experiment was to compare, for patients with cochlear implants (CIs), the improvement for speech understanding in noise provided by a monaural adaptive beamformer and for two interventions that produced bilateral input (i.e., bilateral CIs and hearing preservation [HP] surgery). Method: Speech understanding scores for sentences were obtained for 10 listeners fit with a single CI. The listeners were tested with and without beamformer activated in a "cocktail party" environment with spatially separated target and maskers. Data for 10 listeners with bilateral CIs and 8 listeners with HP CIs were taken from Loiselle, Dorman, Yost, Cook, and Gifford (2016), who used the same test protocol.
Results: The use of the beamformer resulted in a 31 percentage point improvement in performance; in bilateral CIs, an 18 percentage point improvement; and in HP CIs, a 20 percentage point improvement.
Conclusion: A monaural adaptive beamformer can produce an improvement in speech understanding in a complex noise environment that is equal to, or greater than, the improvement produced by bilateral CIs and HP surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28768324      PMCID: PMC5829808          DOI: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-16-0312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  12 in total

1.  Performance of directional microphones for hearing aids: real-world versus simulation.

Authors:  Cynthia L Compton-Conley; Arlene C Neuman; Mead C Killion; Harry Levitt
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Chris James; Domenico Cuda; Alec Fitzgerald O'Connor; Bruno Frachet; Johan H M Frijns; Thomas Klenzner; Roland Laszig; Manuel Manrique; Mathieu Marx; Paul Merkus; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Erwin Offeciers; Joerg Pesch; Angel Ramos-Macias; Alain Robier; Olivier Sterkers; Alain Uziel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Leonid M Litvak; Sarah J Cook; Louise M Loiselle; Melissa D DeJong; Andrea Hedley-Williams; Linsey S Sunderhaus; Catherine A Hayes; René H Gifford
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Audio-visual speech intelligibility benefits with bilateral cochlear implants when talker location varies.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-13

5.  Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing.

Authors:  Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Monika Matusiak; Marek Porowski; Piotr H Skarzynski; Chris J James
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Using ILD or ITD Cues for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in a Complex Listening Environment by Listeners With Bilateral and With Hearing-Preservation Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Louise H Loiselle; Michael F Dorman; William A Yost; Sarah J Cook; Rene H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Julie Liss; Shuai Wang; Visar Berisha; Cimarron Ludwig; Sarah Cook Natale
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  A cost-utility scenario analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  A Quentin Summerfield; David H Marshall; Garry R Barton; Karen E Bloor
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-11

Review 9.  Single and multiple microphone noise reduction strategies in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Behnam Azimi; Yi Hu; David R Friedland
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-08-23

10.  Cochlear implants in the United Kingdom: awareness and utilization.

Authors:  Chris Raine
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound Processors.

Authors:  Robert T Dwyer; Jillian Roberts; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Adult Users of the Oticon Medical Neuro Cochlear Implant System Benefit from Beamforming in the High Frequencies.

Authors:  Bianca Bastos Cordeiro; Marcos Roberto Banhara; Carlos Maurício Cardeal Mendes; Fabiana Danieli; Ariane Laplante-Lévesque; Chadlia Karoui; Michel Hoen; Marine Ardoint; Fanny Gauvrit; Romane Demullier; Christophe Vincent
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-04-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.