Literature DB >> 19494777

Validation of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire.

Richard S Tyler1, Ann E Perreau, Haihong Ji.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Subjective questionnaires are informative in understanding the difficulties faced by patients with hearing loss. Our intent was to establish and validate a new questionnaire that encompasses situations emphasizing binaural hearing. The Spatial Hearing Questionnaire is a self-report assessment tool with eight subscales representing questions; pertaining to the perception of male, female, and children's voices; music in quiet; source localization; understanding speech in quiet; and understanding speech in noise.
DESIGN: The Spatial Hearing Questionnaire, composed of 24 items, is scored from 0 to 100. It was administered to 142 subjects using one or two cochlear implants. Speech perception and localization abilities were measured, and the Speech, Spatial, and Other Qualities questionnaire was completed to evaluate validity of the questionnaire. Psychometric tests were performed to test the reliability and factor structure of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire.
RESULTS: Results showed high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98) and good construct validity (correlations between the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire and other test measures, including the Speech, Spatial, and Other Qualities, were significant). A preliminary factor analysis revealed scores loaded on three factors, representing the following conditions: localization, speech in noise and music in quiet, and speech in quiet, explaining 64.9, 13.0, and 5.3% of the variance, respectively. Most of the questionnaire items (12/24) loaded onto the first factor that represents the subscale related to source localization. Mean scores on the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire were higher for subjects with bilateral cochlear implants than for subjects with a unilateral cochlear implant, consistent with other research and supporting construct validity.
CONCLUSIONS: The Spatial Hearing Questionnaire is a reliable and valid questionnaire that can be completed independently by most patients in about 10 minutes. It is likely to be a valuable tool for clinicians and researchers to measure spatial hearing abilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19494777      PMCID: PMC2723797          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61efe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  28 in total

1.  Validation of the SADL questionnaire.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Measuring Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life: the SADL scale.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Auditory localization abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Carl A Verschuur; Mark E Lutman; Richard Ramsden; Paula Greenham; Martin O'Driscoll
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  William Noble; Stuart Gatehouse
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 5.  Bilateral hearing aids: a review of self-reports of benefit in comparison with unilateral fitting.

Authors:  William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Speech perception and localization with adults with bilateral sequential cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Camille C Dunn; Shelley A Witt; William G Noble
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners.

Authors:  J Peissig; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Disabilities and handicaps associated with impaired auditory localization.

Authors:  W Noble; K Ter-Horst; D Byrne
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap.

Authors:  William Noble; Stuart Gatehouse
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  17 in total

1.  A longitudinal study in adults with sequential bilateral cochlear implants: time course for individual ear and bilateral performance.

Authors:  Ruth M Reeder; Jill B Firszt; Laura K Holden; Michael J Strube
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) Changes Over Time in Adults With Simultaneous Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Richard Tyler; Haihong Ji; Camille Dunn; Ningyu Wang; Marlan Hansen; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Audio-visual speech intelligibility benefits with bilateral cochlear implants when talker location varies.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-13

4.  [Subjective improvement of hearing through cochlear implantation].

Authors:  N Volleth; A Hast; E K Lehmann; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Joshua E Fabie; Prashant N Bhenswala; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  The effect of hearing impairment on localization dominance for single-word stimuli.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd; Fiona H Guy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Listening Effort Measured in Adults with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ann E Perreau; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Bailey Tatge; Diana Irwin; Daniel Corts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation: speech perception and localization pre- and post-second cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Richard S Tyler; Shelley Witt; Haihong Ji; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  Self-reported spatial hearing abilities across different cochlear implant profiles.

Authors:  Ann E Perreau; Hua Ou; Richard Tyler; Camille Dunn
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  The Correlation Analysis Between the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) and the Psychophysical Measurement of Spatial Hearing.

Authors:  Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahi; Maryam Delphi; Vafa Delphi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.