P Schleich1, P Nopp, P D'Haese. 1. Research and Development, Medical Electronics, Innsbruck, Austria. peter.schleich@medel.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of bilateral cochlear implant use on speech perception in noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. DESIGN: Speech reception thresholds were measured in 21 subjects using the Oldenburg sentence test. Speech was always presented from the front. Noise was either presented from the front, from the left side, or from the right side. Each condition was measured for unilateral and bilateral implant use. RESULTS: For three subjects, the test was too difficult to be administered. The 18 subjects from whom a complete data set could be obtained showed a significant head shadow effect and summation effect for all test conditions, whereas the squelch effect was significant for noise from the left side only. Average effect sizes were significant for all effects and amounted to 6.8 dB for the head shadow effect, 0.9 dB for the squelch effect, and 2.1 dB for the summation effect. Effect sizes were not correlated with duration of deafness. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral cochlear implant users can at least qualitatively benefit from the effects that are known from normal-hearing subjects, that is, head shadow, summation, and squelch effect. Bilateral cochlear implantation also reduces the performance gap between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects. Copyright 2004 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of bilateral cochlear implant use on speech perception in noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. DESIGN: Speech reception thresholds were measured in 21 subjects using the Oldenburg sentence test. Speech was always presented from the front. Noise was either presented from the front, from the left side, or from the right side. Each condition was measured for unilateral and bilateral implant use. RESULTS: For three subjects, the test was too difficult to be administered. The 18 subjects from whom a complete data set could be obtained showed a significant head shadow effect and summation effect for all test conditions, whereas the squelch effect was significant for noise from the left side only. Average effect sizes were significant for all effects and amounted to 6.8 dB for the head shadow effect, 0.9 dB for the squelch effect, and 2.1 dB for the summation effect. Effect sizes were not correlated with duration of deafness. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral cochlear implant users can at least qualitatively benefit from the effects that are known from normal-hearing subjects, that is, head shadow, summation, and squelch effect. Bilateral cochlear implantation also reduces the performance gap between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects. Copyright 2004 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Authors: Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin Journal: J Am Acad Audiol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.664
Authors: Ingeborg Hochmair; Peter Nopp; Claude Jolly; Marcus Schmidt; Hansjörg Schösser; Carolyn Garnham; Ilona Anderson Journal: Trends Amplif Date: 2006-12
Authors: Philipos C Loizou; Yi Hu; Ruth Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Robert Peters; Jennifer Lake; Peter Roland Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Son-A Chang; Richard S Tyler; Camille C Dunn; Haihong Ji; Shelley A Witt; Bruce Gantz; Marlan Hansen Journal: J Am Acad Audiol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 1.664