Literature DB >> 8778308

Fractal dimension and architecture of trabecular bone.

N L Fazzalari1, I H Parkinson.   

Abstract

The fractal dimension of trabecular bone was determined for biopsies from the proximal femur of 25 subjects undergoing hip arthroplasty. The average age was 67.7 years. A binary profile of the trabecular bone in the biopsy was obtained from a digitized image. A program written for the Quantimet 520 performed the fractal analysis. The fractal dimension was calculated for each specimen, using boxes whose sides ranged from 65 to 1000 microns in length. The mean fractal dimension for the 25 subjects was 1.195 +/- 0.064 and shows that in Euclidean terms the surface extent of trabecular bone is indeterminate. The Quantimet 520 was also used to perform bone histomorphometric measurements. These were bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) (per cent) = 11.05 +/- 4.38, bone surface/total volume (BS/TV) (mm2/mm3) = 1.90 +/- 0.51, trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) (mm) = 0.12 +/- 0.03, trabecular spacing (Tb.Sp) (mm) = 1.03 +/- 0.36, and trabecular number (Tb.N) (number/mm) = 0.95 +/- 0.25. Pearsons' correlation coefficients showed a statistically significant relationship between the fractal dimension and all the histomorphometric parameters, with BV/TV (r = 0.85, P < 0.0001), BS/TV (r = 0.74, P < 0.0001), Tb.Th (r = 0.50, P < 0.02), Tb.Sp (r = -0.81, P < 0.0001), and Tb.N (r = 0.76, P < 0.0001). This method for calculating fractal dimension shows that trabecular bone exhibits fractal properties over a defined box size, which is within the dimensions of a structural unit for trabecular bone. Therefore, the fractal dimension of trabecular bone provides a measure which does not rely on Euclidean descriptors in order to describe a complex geometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8778308     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199601)178:1<100::AID-PATH429>3.0.CO;2-K

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  13 in total

Review 1.  New laboratory tools in the assessment of bone quality.

Authors:  D Chappard; M F Baslé; E Legrand; M Audran
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

Authors:  R Pauwels; R Jacobs; S R Singer; M Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Comparison of mandibular bone microarchitecture between micro-CT and CBCT images.

Authors:  S Panmekiate; N Ngonphloy; T Charoenkarn; T Faruangsaeng; R Pauwels
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Fractal analysis for the assessment of trabecular peri-implant alveolar bone using panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Mert Zeytinoğlu; Betül İlhan; Nesrin Dündar; Hayal Boyacioğlu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Effect of exposure parameters and voxel size on bone structure analysis in CBCT.

Authors:  R Pauwels; T Faruangsaeng; T Charoenkarn; N Ngonphloy; S Panmekiate
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Fractal and Fourier analysis of the hepatic sinusoidal network in normal and cirrhotic rat liver.

Authors:  Eugenio Gaudio; Slawomir Chaberek; Andrea Montella; Luigi Pannarale; Sergio Morini; Gilnardo Novelli; Federica Borghese; Davide Conte; Kazimierz Ostrowski
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Evaluation´ of mandibular alveolar bone in patients with different vertical facial patterns : A cross-sectional CBCT study.

Authors:  Sibel Akbulut; Seval Bayrak
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 8.  A healthy dose of chaos: Using fractal frameworks for engineering higher-fidelity biomedical systems.

Authors:  Anastasia Korolj; Hau-Tieng Wu; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Image analysis in medical imaging: recent advances in selected examples.

Authors:  G Dougherty
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2010-07-01

10.  Fractal analysis as a useful predictor for determining osseointegration of dental implant? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Emrah Soylu; Aykağan Coşgunarslan; Selin Çelebi; Damla Soydan; Ahmet Emin Demirbaş; Osman Demir
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.