Literature DB >> 25563259

Multiscale bilateral filtering for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Yao Lu1, Heang-Ping Chan1, Jun Wei1, Lubomir M Hadjiiski1, Ravi K Samala1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Detection of subtle microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a challenging task because of the large, noisy DBT volume. It is important to enhance the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of microcalcifications in DBT reconstruction. Most regularization methods depend on local gradient and may treat the ill-defined margins or subtle spiculations of masses and subtle microcalcifications as noise because of their small gradient. The authors developed a new multiscale bilateral filtering (MSBF) regularization method for the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART) to improve the CNR of microcalcifications without compromising the quality of masses.
METHODS: The MSBF exploits a multiscale structure of DBT images to suppress noise and selectively enhance high frequency structures. At the end of each SART iteration, every DBT slice is decomposed into several frequency bands via Laplacian pyramid decomposition. No regularization is applied to the low frequency bands so that subtle edges of masses and structured background are preserved. Bilateral filtering is applied to the high frequency bands to enhance microcalcifications while suppressing noise. The regularized DBT images are used for updating in the next SART iteration. The new MSBF method was compared with the nonconvex total p-variation (TpV) method for noise regularization with SART. A GE GEN2 prototype DBT system was used for acquisition of projections at 21 angles in 3° increments over a ± 30° range. The reconstruction image quality with no regularization (NR) and that with the two regularization methods were compared using the DBT scans of a heterogeneous breast phantom and several human subjects with masses and microcalcifications. The CNR and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the line profiles of microcalcifications and across the spiculations within their in-focus DBT slices were used as image quality measures.
RESULTS: The MSBF method reduced contouring artifacts and enhanced the CNR of microcalcifications compared to the TpV method, thus preserving the image quality of the structured background. The MSBF method achieved the highest CNR of microcalcifications among the three methods. The FWHM of the microcalcifications and mass spiculations resulting from the MSBF method was comparable to that without regularization, and superior to that of the TpV method.
CONCLUSIONS: The SART regularized by the multiscale bilateral filtering method enhanced the CNR of microcalcifications and preserved the sharpness of microcalcifications and spiculated masses. The MSBF method provided better image quality of the structured background and was superior to TpV and NR for enhancing microcalcifications while preserving the appearance of mass margins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25563259      PMCID: PMC4277560          DOI: 10.1118/1.4903283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  30 in total

1.  Multiscale contrast enhancement for radiographies: Laplacian Pyramid versus fast wavelet transform.

Authors:  Sabine Dippel; Martin Stahl; Rafael Wiemker; Thomas Blaffert
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.

Authors:  Matthew G Wallis; Elin Moa; Federica Zanca; Karin Leifland; Mats Danielsson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Yi-Ta Wu; Berkman Sahiner; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie; Yiheng Zhang; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Ted Way
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Richard H Moore; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Yiheng Zhang; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Jun Wei; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Jun Ge; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Convergence of the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART).

Authors:  Ming Jiang; Ge Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 10.856

7.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.

Authors:  David Gur; Gordon S Abrams; Denise M Chough; Marie A Ganott; Christiane M Hakim; Ronald L Perrin; Grace Y Rathfon; Jules H Sumkin; Margarita L Zuley; Andriy I Bandos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Mark A Helvie; Scott Zelakiewicz; Andrea Schmitz; Mitra Noroozian; Chintana Paramagul; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Alexis V Nees; Colleen H Neal; Paul Carson; Yao Lu; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Jun Wei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  A fast poly-energetic iterative FBP algorithm.

Authors:  Yuan Lin; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  10 in total

1.  Synthesizing mammogram from digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Colleen H Neal; Yao Lu; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis using joint information from volumetric and planar projection images.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Yao Lu; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Improving image quality for digital breast tomosynthesis: an automated detection and diffusion-based method for metal artifact reduction.

Authors:  Yao Lu; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Ravi K Samala
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Analysis of computer-aided detection techniques and signal characteristics for clustered microcalcifications on digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Detector Blur and Correlated Noise Modeling for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiabei Zheng; Jeffrey A Fessler; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Deep Convolutional Neural Network With Adversarial Training for Denoising Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.

Authors:  Mingjie Gao; Jeffrey A Fessler; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 11.037

7.  Exon prediction based on multiscale products of a genomic-inspired multiscale bilateral filtering.

Authors:  Xiaolei Zhang; Weijun Pan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Improved digital chest tomosynthesis image quality by use of a projection-based dual-energy virtual monochromatic convolutional neural network with super resolution.

Authors:  Tsutomu Gomi; Hidetake Hara; Yusuke Watanabe; Shinya Mizukami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of a Generative Adversarial Network to Improve Image Quality and Reduce Radiation-Dose during Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Gomi; Yukie Kijima; Takayuki Kobayashi; Yukio Koibuchi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14

10.  Use of a Total Variation Minimization Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm to Evaluate Reduced Projections during Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Gomi; Yukio Koibuchi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.