Literature DB >> 27648708

Analysis of computer-aided detection techniques and signal characteristics for clustered microcalcifications on digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Ravi K Samala1, Heang-Ping Chan, Lubomir M Hadjiiski, Mark A Helvie.   

Abstract

With IRB approval, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images of human subjects were collected using a GE GEN2 DBT prototype system. Corresponding digital mammograms (DMs) of the same subjects were collected retrospectively from patient files. The data set contained a total of 237 views of DBT and equal number of DM views from 120 human subjects, each included 163 views with microcalcification clusters (MCs) and 74 views without MCs. The data set was separated into training and independent test sets. The pre-processing, object prescreening and segmentation, false positive reduction and clustering strategies for MC detection by three computer-aided detection (CADe) systems designed for DM, DBT, and a planar projection image generated from DBT were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves based on features extracted from microcalcifications and free-response ROC (FROC) curves based on scores from MCs were used to quantify the performance of the systems. Jackknife FROC (JAFROC) and non-parametric analysis methods were used to determine the statistical difference between the FROC curves. The difference between the CADDM and CADDBT systems when the false positive rate was estimated from cases without MCs did not reach statistical significance. The study indicates that the large search space in DBT may not be a limiting factor for CADe to achieve similar performance as that observed in DM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27648708      PMCID: PMC5081259          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/19/7092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  41 in total

1.  Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study.

Authors:  Matthew G Wallis; Elin Moa; Federica Zanca; Karin Leifland; Mats Danielsson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Joint two-view information for computerized detection of microcalcifications on mammograms.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Chinatana Paramagul; Jun Ge; Jun Wei; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.

Authors:  Jun Ge; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie; Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Multiscale bilateral filtering for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Yao Lu; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Ravi K Samala
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.

Authors:  J M Lewin; R E Hendrick; C J D'Orsi; P K Isaacs; L J Moss; A Karellas; G A Sisney; C C Kuni; G R Cutter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachel F Brem; Jeffrey W Hoffmeister; Jocelyn A Rapelyea; Gilat Zisman; Kevin Mohtashemi; Guarav Jindal; Martin P Disimio; Steven K Rogers
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Corinne Balleyguier; Felix Diekmann; Susanne Diekmann; Jean-Charles Piguet; Kari Young; Loren T Niklason
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review.

Authors:  Matthias Elter; Alexander Horsch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  John M Lewin; Carl J D'Orsi; R Edward Hendrick; Lawrence J Moss; Pamela K Isaacs; Andrew Karellas; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Jun Wei; Kenny Cha
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A collection input based support tensor machine for lesion malignancy classification in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Benjuan Yang; Yingjiang Wu; Zhiguo Zhou; Shulong Li; Genggeng Qin; Liyuan Chen; Jing Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Calcifications at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Imaging Features and Biopsy Techniques.

Authors:  Joao V Horvat; Delia M Keating; Halio Rodrigues-Duarte; Elizabeth A Morris; Victoria L Mango
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Effects of Training Sample Size on Multi-Stage Transfer Learning Using Deep Neural Nets.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Caleb D Richter; Kenny H Cha
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Automatic Classification of Simulated Breast Tomosynthesis Whole Images for the Presence of Microcalcification Clusters Using Deep CNNs.

Authors:  Ana M Mota; Matthew J Clarkson; Pedro Almeida; Nuno Matela
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-08-29

6.  Analysis of the Cluster Prominence Feature for Detecting Calcifications in Mammograms.

Authors:  Alejandra Cruz-Bernal; Martha M Flores-Barranco; Dora L Almanza-Ojeda; Sergio Ledesma; Mario A Ibarra-Manzano
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-12-30       Impact factor: 2.682

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.