Literature DB >> 25562887

Computing the surveillance error grid analysis: procedure and examples.

Boris P Kovatchev1, Christian A Wakeman2, Marc D Breton2, Gerald J Kost3, Richard F Louie3, Nam K Tran3, David C Klonoff4.   

Abstract

The surveillance error grid (SEG) analysis is a tool for analysis and visualization of blood glucose monitoring (BGM) errors, based on the opinions of 206 diabetes clinicians who rated 4 distinct treatment scenarios. Resulting from this large-scale inquiry is a matrix of 337 561 risk ratings, 1 for each pair of (reference, BGM) readings ranging from 20 to 580 mg/dl. The computation of the SEG is therefore complex and in need of automation. The SEG software introduced in this article automates the task of assigning a degree of risk to each data point for a set of measured and reference blood glucose values so that the data can be distributed into 8 risk zones. The software's 2 main purposes are to (1) distribute a set of BG Monitor data into 8 risk zones ranging from none to extreme and (2) present the data in a color coded display to promote visualization. Besides aggregating the data into 8 zones corresponding to levels of risk, the SEG computes the number and percentage of data pairs in each zone and the number/percentage of data pairs above/below the diagonal line in each zone, which are associated with BGM errors creating risks for hypo- or hyperglycemia, respectively. To illustrate the action of the SEG software we first present computer-simulated data stratified along error levels defined by ISO 15197:2013. This allows the SEG to be linked to this established standard. Further illustration of the SEG procedure is done with a series of previously published data, which reflect the performance of BGM devices and test strips under various environmental conditions. We conclude that the SEG software is a useful addition to the SEG analysis presented in this journal, developed to assess the magnitude of clinical risk from analytically inaccurate data in a variety of high-impact situations such as intensive care and disaster settings.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood glucose monitoring; error grid analysis; hyperglycemia; hypoglycemia; meter errors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25562887      PMCID: PMC4764239          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814539590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  15 in total

1.  Biopsychobehavioral model of risk of severe hypoglycemia. Self-management behaviors.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D J Cox; L Gonder-Frederick; D Julian; B Kovatchev; D Young-Hyman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Mapping point-of-care performance using locally-smoothed median and maximum absolute difference curves.

Authors:  Gerald J Kost; Nam K Tran; Harpreet Singh
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Impact of blood glucose self-monitoring errors on glucose variability, risk for hypoglycemia, and average glucose control in type 1 diabetes: an in silico study.

Authors:  Marc D Breton; Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

4.  The surveillance error grid.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Courtney Lias; Robert Vigersky; William Clarke; Joan Lee Parkes; David B Sacks; M Sue Kirkman; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-13

5.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Glucose meter performance criteria for tight glycemic control estimated by simulation modeling.

Authors:  Brad S Karon; James C Boyd; George G Klee
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Effects of humidity on foil and vial packaging to preserve glucose and lactate test strips for disaster readiness.

Authors:  Anh-Thu Truong; Richard F Louie; John H Vy; Corbin M Curtis; William J Ferguson; Mandy Lam; Stephanie Sumner; Gerald J Kost
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 1.385

8.  Evaluation of point-of-care glucose testing accuracy using locally-smoothed median absolute difference curves.

Authors:  Gerald J Kost; Nam K Tran; Victor J Abad; Richard F Louie
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.786

9.  Monte Carlo simulation in establishing analytical quality requirements for clinical laboratory tests meeting clinical needs.

Authors:  James C Boyd; David E Bruns
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.600

10.  Short-Term Thermal-Humidity Shock Affects Point-of-Care Glucose Testing: Implications for Health Professionals and Patients.

Authors:  Mandy Lam; Richard F Louie; Corbin M Curtis; William J Ferguson; John H Vy; Anh-Thu Truong; Stephanie L Sumner; Gerald J Kost
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-01
View more
  18 in total

1.  The Effects of Temperature and Relative Humidity on Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Hospital Practice in a Tropical Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Busadee Pratumvinit; Nattakom Charoenkoop; Soamsiri Niwattisaiwong; Gerald J Kost; Panutsaya Tientadakul
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-22

2.  Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients After Total Pancreatectomy with Islet Autotransplantation.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Brandon M Nathan; Antoinette Moran; Ty B Dunn; Gregory J Beilman; Timothy L Pruett; Boris P Kovatchev; Melena D Bellin
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 3.  Toward a Framework for Outcome-Based Analytical Performance Specifications: A Methodology Review of Indirect Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Measurement Uncertainty on Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Alison F Smith; Bethany Shinkins; Peter S Hall; Claire T Hulme; Mike P Messenger
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Assessment of System Accuracy, Intermediate Measurement Precision, and Measurement Repeatability of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System Based on ISO 15197.

Authors:  Nina Jendrike; Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Jochen Mende; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-14

5.  Stability, Accuracy, and Risk Assessment of a Novel Subcutaneous Glucose Sensor.

Authors:  Jonathan Hughes; John B Welsh; Naresh C Bhavaraju; Stephen J Vanslyke; Andrew K Balo
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  System Accuracy Assessment of a Blood Glucose Meter With Wireless Internet Access Associated With Unusual Hypoglycemia Patterns in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; Filiz Demircik; Valeria Kirsch; Johannes Pfützner; Stephanie Strobl; Mina Hanna; Jan Spatz; Anke H Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-11

7.  Evidence From a Long-Term, Systematic Post-Market Surveillance Program: Clinical Performance of a Hematocrit-Insensitive Blood Glucose Test Strip.

Authors:  Steven Setford; Stuart Phillips; Mike Grady
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-07

8.  Continuous Glucose Monitor Use and Accuracy in Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Vikash Dadlani; Yogish C Kudva
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Head-to-head comparison of two continuous glucose monitoring systems on a cardio-surgical ICU.

Authors:  M A Punke; C Decker; M Petzoldt; D A Reuter; K H Wodack; H Reichenspurner; M Kubik; S Kluge
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Assessment of a Noninvasive Chronic Glucose Monitoring System in Euglycemic and Diabetic Swine (Sus scrofa).

Authors:  Rebecca A Ober; Gail E Geist
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 1.232

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.