Literature DB >> 30730221

Evidence From a Long-Term, Systematic Post-Market Surveillance Program: Clinical Performance of a Hematocrit-Insensitive Blood Glucose Test Strip.

Steven Setford1, Stuart Phillips1, Mike Grady1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Described is a manufacturer's systematic post-market evaluation of the long-term clinical accuracy of a commercially available blood glucose monitoring (BGM) test strip product.
METHODS: Production batches of test strips were routinely and regularly sampled and evaluated in a clinical setting to assess product accuracy. Evaluations were performed on capillary blood samples from a minimum of 100 subjects with diabetes, by clinical staff according to instructions for use. Readings were compared against capillary blood samples collected at the same time and measured by a standard laboratory reference method. Clinical accuracy was calculated according to EN ISO 15197:2015.
RESULTS: A total of 21 115 paired results were obtained, equating to 209 production batches over the >3-year period since test strip launch. Of the results, 97.6% met the accuracy criterion (range: 97.1-98.1% by year), with 98.1% of values presenting zero risk as defined by the surveillance error grid. At the <5th (21.0-33.8%) and >95th (48.3-59.4%) percentile extremes of hematocrit distribution, 97.9% and 96.4% of values were clinically accurate. The product also demonstrated clinical accuracy across all seven glucose ranges ("bins") as defined by the standard. Under conditions of combined hematocrit and glucose (<80 mg/dL and ≥300 mg/dL) extremes, 97.7% of values were clinically accurate.
CONCLUSIONS: Methodologies and results from a manufacturer's self-imposed clinical accuracy surveillance program of a BGM product is presented. Given the publication of sometimes-conflicting data presented within ad hoc BGM clinical accuracy evaluations, usually of limited size, it is advocated that BGM manufacturers adopt similarly robust and systematic surveillance programs to safeguard patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; clinic; extreme; glucose; hematocrit; surveillance

Year:  2019        PMID: 30730221      PMCID: PMC7783001          DOI: 10.1177/1932296819826968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  20 in total

Review 1.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Yan Li; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Seven-Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip Product.

Authors:  Steven Setford; Mike Grady; Stuart Phillips; Lesley Miller; Stephen Mackintosh; Hilary Cameron; Krisna Corrigall
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-13

3.  Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Annette Baumstark; Christina Schmid; Stefan Pleus; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.

Authors:  Leslie J Klaff; Ronald Brazg; Kristen Hughes; Ann M Tideman; Holly C Schachner; Patricia Stenger; Scott Pardo; Nancy Dunne; Joan Lee Parkes
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Computing the surveillance error grid analysis: procedure and examples.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Christian A Wakeman; Marc D Breton; Gerald J Kost; Richard F Louie; Nam K Tran; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-13

6.  Accuracy Evaluation of One Glucose Monitoring System Following ISO 15197:2013 Standards.

Authors:  Kyungso Jeon; Miseon Shin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-26

7.  Seven-Year Clinical Surveillance Program Demonstrates Consistent MARD Accuracy Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip.

Authors:  Steven Setford; Mike Grady; Stephen Mackintosh; Robert Donald; Brian Levy
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-30

8.  System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Manuela Link; Christina Schmid; Stefan Pleus; Annette Baumstark; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Do currently available blood glucose monitors meet regulatory standards? 1-day public meeting in Arlington, Virginia.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Juliet S Reyes
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-01

10.  Investigation of the Accuracy of 18 Marketed Blood Glucose Monitors.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Joan Lee Parkes; Boris P Kovatchev; David Kerr; Wendy C Bevier; Ronald L Brazg; Mark Christiansen; Timothy S Bailey; James H Nichols; Michael A Kohn
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.