Literature DB >> 22008003

Mapping point-of-care performance using locally-smoothed median and maximum absolute difference curves.

Gerald J Kost1, Nam K Tran, Harpreet Singh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal is to introduce visual performance mapping efficient for establishing acceptance criteria and facilitating decisions regarding the utility of hospital point-of-care devices. This approach uniquely reveals the quality of performance locally, as opposed to globally.
METHODS: After presenting theoretical foundations, this study illustrates the approach by applying it to six hospital glucose meter systems (GMSs) using clinical multi-center (n=2767) and multi-system (n=613, n=100) observations.
RESULTS: LS MAD curves identified breakouts, that is, points where the locally-smoothed median absolute difference (LS MAD) curve exceeds the recommended error tolerance limit of 5 mg/dL (0.28 mmol/L). LS maximum absolute difference (MaxAD) breakthroughs, which occur where the LS MaxAD curve exceeds the 99th percentile of MaxADs from x=30-200 mg/dL (1.67-11.10 mmol/L), showed extreme error locations. A multi-sensor interference- and hematocrirt-correcting GMS displayed a flat LS MAD curve until it reached a breakout of 179 mg/dL (9.94 mmol/L) and generated breakthroughs that could affect bedside decision-making, but less erratically than other systems with inadequate performance for hospital critical care. We discovered Class I (meter high, reference low) and Class II (converse) discrepant values in some systems. Class I errors could lead to inappropriate insulin dosing and hypoglycemic episodes in tight glucose control.
CONCLUSIONS: LS MAD-MaxAD curves help assess the performance of point-of-care testing. Visual mapping of systematic and random errors locally over the entire analyte measurement range in a single integrated display is an advantage when considering the adverse impact of zones of poor quantitative performance on specific clinical applications, threshold-driven bedside decisions and the care of critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22008003     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  2 in total

1.  Computing the surveillance error grid analysis: procedure and examples.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Christian A Wakeman; Marc D Breton; Gerald J Kost; Richard F Louie; Nam K Tran; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-13

2.  Clinical impact of sample interference on intensive insulin therapy in severely burned patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Nam K Tran; Zachary R Godwin; Jennifer C Bockhold; Anthony G Passerini; Julian Cheng; Morgan Ingemason
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.