Literature DB >> 22814034

The effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on intracochlear sound pressures.

Dominic V Pisano1, Marlien E F Niesten, Saumil N Merchant, Hideko Heidi Nakajima.   

Abstract

Semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) is a pathological opening in the bony wall of the inner ear that can result in conductive hearing loss. The hearing loss is variable across patients, and the precise mechanism and source of variability are not fully understood. Simultaneous measurements of basal intracochlear sound pressures in scala vestibuli (SV) and scala tympani (ST) enable quantification of the differential pressure across the cochlear partition, the stimulus that excites the cochlear partition. We used intracochlear sound pressure measurements in cadaveric preparations to study the effects of SCD size. Sound-induced pressures in SV and ST, as well as stapes velocity and ear canal pressure were measured simultaneously for various sizes of SCD followed by SCD patching. Our results showed that at low frequencies (<600 Hz), SCD decreased the pressure in both SV and ST, as well as differential pressure, and these effects became more pronounced as dehiscence size was increased. Near 100 Hz, SV decreased by about 10 dB for a 0.5-mm dehiscence and by 20 dB for a 2-mm dehiscence, while ST decreased by about 8 dB for a 0.5-mm dehiscence and by 18 dB for a 2-mm dehiscence. Differential pressure decreased by about 10 dB for a 0.5-mm dehiscence and by about 20 dB for a 2-mm dehiscence at 100 Hz. In some ears, for frequencies above 1 kHz, the smallest pinpoint dehiscence had bigger effects on the differential pressure (10-dB decrease) than larger dehiscences (less than 10-dB decrease), suggesting larger hearing losses in this frequency range. These effects due to SCD were reversible by patching the dehiscence. We also showed that under certain circumstances such as SCD, stapes velocity is not related to how the ear can transduce sound across the cochlear partition because it is not directly related to the differential pressure, emphasizing that certain pathologies cannot be fully assessed by measurements such as stapes velocity.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22814034      PMCID: PMC3541532          DOI: 10.1159/000339653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  16 in total

1.  Superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  L B Minor
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-01

2.  A mechano-acoustic model of the effect of superior canal dehiscence on hearing in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea?

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Dehiscence of bone overlying the superior canal as a cause of apparent conductive hearing loss.

Authors:  Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey; Phillip D Cremer; Lawrence R Lustig; Sven-Olrik Streubel; Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  A superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome multicenter study: is there an association between size and symptoms?

Authors:  Alain Pfammatter; Vincent Darrouzet; Marcel Gärtner; Thomas Somers; Joost Van Dinther; Franco Trabalzini; Denis Ayache; Thomas Linder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Techniques for human temporal bone removal: information for the scientific community.

Authors:  J B Nadol
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  The relationship between the air-bone gap and the size of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Heng-Wai Yuen; Rudolf Boeddinghaus; Robert H Eikelboom; Marcus D Atlas
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Clinical, experimental, and theoretical investigations of the effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on hearing mechanisms.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Jocelyn E Songer; Hideko H Nakajima; Kelly M Brinsko; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo.

Authors:  Anthony A Mikulec; Michael J McKenna; Mitchell J Ramsey; John J Rosowski; Barbara S Herrmann; Steven D Rauch; Hugh D Curtin; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Prospective radiological study concerning a series of patients suffering from conductive or mixed hearing loss due to superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Christian Martin; Pierre Chahine; Charles Veyret; Céline Richard; Jean Michel Prades; Jean François Pouget
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  26 in total

1.  Identifying Mechanisms Behind the Tullio Phenomenon: a Computational Study Based on First Principles.

Authors:  Bernhard J Grieser; Leonhard Kleiser; Dominik Obrist
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-16

2.  Effectiveness of Transmastoid Plugging for Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Acoustic effects of a superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a temporal bone study.

Authors:  J C Luers; D Pazen; H Meister; M Lauxmann; A Eiber; D Beutner; K B Hüttenbrink
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Acoustic and vestibular effects of superior semicircular canal dehiscence].

Authors:  J-C Luers; K-B Hüttenbrink
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Clinical and Physiologic Predictors and Postoperative Outcomes of Near Dehiscence Syndrome.

Authors:  Michael Baxter; Colin McCorkle; Carolina Trevino Guajardo; Maria Geraldine Zuniga; Alex M Carter; Charles C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey; Bryan K Ward
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence size and location on audiometric measurements, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and video-head impulse testing.

Authors:  Andrea Castellucci; Gianluca Piras; Valeria Del Vecchio; Francesco Maria Crocetta; Vincenzo Maiolo; Gian Gaetano Ferri; Angelo Ghidini; Cristina Brandolini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Computerized Assessment of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Size using Advanced Morphological Imaging Operators.

Authors:  Joel S Beckett; Carlito Lagman; Lawrance K Chung; Timothy T Bui; Seung J Lee; Brittany L Voth; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Quinton Gopen; Isaac Yang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-12-07

8.  Infrasound transmission in the human ear: Implications for acoustic and vestibular responses of the normal and dehiscent inner ear.

Authors:  Stefan Raufer; Salwa F Masud; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Superior canal dehiscence length and location influences clinical presentation and audiometric and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential testing.

Authors:  Marlien E F Niesten; Leena M Hamberg; Joshua B Silverman; Kristina V Lou; Andrew A McCall; Alanna Windsor; Hugh D Curtin; Barbara S Herrmann; Wilko Grolman; Hideko H Nakajima; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Correlation of Superior Canal Dehiscence Surface Area With Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials, Audiometric Thresholds, and Dizziness Handicap.

Authors:  Jacob B Hunter; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Srijata Chakravorti; Katie Makowiec; Matthew L Carlson; Benoit Dawant; Devin L McCaslin; Jack H Noble; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.