Literature DB >> 19932839

The relationship between the air-bone gap and the size of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Heng-Wai Yuen1, Rudolf Boeddinghaus, Robert H Eikelboom, Marcus D Atlas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between the air-bone gap (ABG) and the size of the superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) as measured on a computed tomography (CT) scan. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series with chart review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twenty-three patients (28 ears) diagnosed with SSCD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The size of the dehiscence on CT scans and the ABG on pure-tone audiometry were recorded.
RESULTS: The size of the dehiscence ranged from 1.0 to 6.0 mm (mean, 3.5 +/- 1.6 mm). Six ears with a dehiscence measuring less than 3.0 mm did not have an ABG (0 dB). The remaining 18 ears showed an average ABG at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz (AvABG(500-2000)) ranging from 3.3 to 27.0 dB (mean, 11.6 +/- 5.7 dB). The analysis of the relationship between the dehiscence size and AvABG(500-2000) revealed a correlation of R(2) = 0.828 (P < 0.001, quadratic fit) and R(2) = 0.780 (P < 0.001, linear fit). Therefore, the larger the dehiscence, the larger the ABG at lower frequencies on pure-tone audiometry.
CONCLUSIONS: In SSCD patients, an ABG is consistently shown at the low frequency when the dehiscence is larger than 3 mm. The size of the average ABG correlates with the size of the dehiscence. These findings highlight the effect of the dehiscence size on conductive hearing loss in SSCD and contribute to a better understanding of the symptomatology of patients with SSCD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19932839     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  11 in total

1.  Superior canal dehiscence size: multivariate assessment of clinical impact.

Authors:  Wade W Chien; Kristen Janky; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence size and location on audiometric measurements, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and video-head impulse testing.

Authors:  Andrea Castellucci; Gianluca Piras; Valeria Del Vecchio; Francesco Maria Crocetta; Vincenzo Maiolo; Gian Gaetano Ferri; Angelo Ghidini; Cristina Brandolini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Computerized Assessment of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Size using Advanced Morphological Imaging Operators.

Authors:  Joel S Beckett; Carlito Lagman; Lawrance K Chung; Timothy T Bui; Seung J Lee; Brittany L Voth; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Quinton Gopen; Isaac Yang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-12-07

4.  The effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on intracochlear sound pressures.

Authors:  Dominic V Pisano; Marlien E F Niesten; Saumil N Merchant; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Assessment of the effects of superior canal dehiscence location and size on intracochlear sound pressures.

Authors:  Marlien E F Niesten; Christof Stieger; Daniel J Lee; Julie P Merchant; Wilko Grolman; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Superior canal dehiscence length and location influences clinical presentation and audiometric and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential testing.

Authors:  Marlien E F Niesten; Leena M Hamberg; Joshua B Silverman; Kristina V Lou; Andrew A McCall; Alanna Windsor; Hugh D Curtin; Barbara S Herrmann; Wilko Grolman; Hideko H Nakajima; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Correlation of Superior Canal Dehiscence Surface Area With Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials, Audiometric Thresholds, and Dizziness Handicap.

Authors:  Jacob B Hunter; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Srijata Chakravorti; Katie Makowiec; Matthew L Carlson; Benoit Dawant; Devin L McCaslin; Jack H Noble; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  The Tullio phenomenon: a neurologically neglected presentation.

Authors:  Diego Kaski; R Davies; L Luxon; A M Bronstein; P Rudge
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Mechanisms of Hearing Loss in a Guinea Pig Model of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence.

Authors:  Bu-Sheng Tong; Zi-Yu He; Chen-Ru Ding; Juan-Mei Yang; Jing Wang; Zhao Han; Yi-Bo Huang; Na Gao; Xian-Hao Jia; Fang-Lu Chi; Dong-Dong Ren
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence in East Asian women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Alexander Yu; Douglas L Teich; Gul Moonis; Eric T Wong
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2012-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.