Literature DB >> 22664896

Superior canal dehiscence size: multivariate assessment of clinical impact.

Wade W Chien1, Kristen Janky, Lloyd B Minor, John P Carey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between dehiscence length in patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome and their clinical findings, including objective audiometric and vestibular testing results. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients included in this study were diagnosed with superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome and underwent surgical repair of the dehiscence through middle fossa craniotomy. The dehiscence length was measured intraoperatively in all cases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation between dehiscence length with pure-tone average (PTA), average bone-conduction threshold, maximal air-bone gap, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential thresholds, and presenting signs and symptoms.
RESULTS: The correlation between dehiscence length and maximal air-bone gap was statistically significant on both univariate and multivariate regression analyses. The correlations between dehiscence length and PTA, average bone-conduction threshold, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential threshold, and presenting signs and symptoms were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The dehiscence length correlated positively with the maximal air-bone gap in patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence. The correlation was statistically significant. The dehiscence length did not correlate with the other variables examined in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22664896      PMCID: PMC3620043          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318248eac4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  17 in total

1.  Superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  L B Minor
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-01

2.  Measurements of human middle- and inner-ear mechanics with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  Wade Chien; Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  A mechano-acoustic model of the effect of superior canal dehiscence on hearing in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Age-related differences in parameters of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Sun Kyu Lee; Chang Il Cha; Tae Suk Jung; Dong Choon Park; Seung Geun Yeo
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  A superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome multicenter study: is there an association between size and symptoms?

Authors:  Alain Pfammatter; Vincent Darrouzet; Marcel Gärtner; Thomas Somers; Joost Van Dinther; Franco Trabalzini; Denis Ayache; Thomas Linder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Eye movements in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome align with the abnormal canal.

Authors:  P D Cremer; L B Minor; J P Carey; C C Della Santina
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-12-26       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Auditory function in patients with surgically treated superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Charles J Limb; John P Carey; Sharmila Srireddy; Lloyd B Minor
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  L B Minor; D Solomon; J S Zinreich; D S Zee
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-03

9.  The relationship between the air-bone gap and the size of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Heng-Wai Yuen; Rudolf Boeddinghaus; Robert H Eikelboom; Marcus D Atlas
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Risk factors for hearing loss in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2002.

Authors:  Yuri Agrawal; Elizabeth A Platz; John K Niparko
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  19 in total

1.  Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at Johns Hopkins: The first 100 years (1914-2014).

Authors:  Howard W Francis; Ira Papel; Ioan Lina; Wayne Koch; David Tunkel; Paul Fuchs; Sandra Lin; David Kennedy; Robert Ruben; Fred Linthicum; Bernard Marsh; Simon Best; John Carey; Andrew Lane; Patrick Byrne; Paul Flint; David W Eisele
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Clinical and Physiologic Predictors and Postoperative Outcomes of Near Dehiscence Syndrome.

Authors:  Michael Baxter; Colin McCorkle; Carolina Trevino Guajardo; Maria Geraldine Zuniga; Alex M Carter; Charles C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey; Bryan K Ward
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Intraoperative neuromonitoring for superior semicircular canal dehiscence and hearing outcomes.

Authors:  Angela Wenzel; Bryan K Ward; Eva K Ritzl; Sergio Gutierrez-Hernandez; Charles C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 4.  Some Remarks on Imaging of the Inner Ear: Options and Limitations.

Authors:  A Giesemann; E Hofmann
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence size and location on audiometric measurements, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and video-head impulse testing.

Authors:  Andrea Castellucci; Gianluca Piras; Valeria Del Vecchio; Francesco Maria Crocetta; Vincenzo Maiolo; Gian Gaetano Ferri; Angelo Ghidini; Cristina Brandolini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Computerized Assessment of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Size using Advanced Morphological Imaging Operators.

Authors:  Joel S Beckett; Carlito Lagman; Lawrance K Chung; Timothy T Bui; Seung J Lee; Brittany L Voth; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Quinton Gopen; Isaac Yang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-12-07

7.  Practice guideline: Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors:  Terry D Fife; James G Colebatch; Kevin A Kerber; Krister Brantberg; Michael Strupp; Hyung Lee; Mark F Walker; Eric Ashman; Jeffrey Fletcher; Brian Callaghan; David S Gloss
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Assessment of the effects of superior canal dehiscence location and size on intracochlear sound pressures.

Authors:  Marlien E F Niesten; Christof Stieger; Daniel J Lee; Julie P Merchant; Wilko Grolman; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Superior canal dehiscence length and location influences clinical presentation and audiometric and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential testing.

Authors:  Marlien E F Niesten; Leena M Hamberg; Joshua B Silverman; Kristina V Lou; Andrew A McCall; Alanna Windsor; Hugh D Curtin; Barbara S Herrmann; Wilko Grolman; Hideko H Nakajima; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Correlation of Superior Canal Dehiscence Surface Area With Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials, Audiometric Thresholds, and Dizziness Handicap.

Authors:  Jacob B Hunter; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Srijata Chakravorti; Katie Makowiec; Matthew L Carlson; Benoit Dawant; Devin L McCaslin; Jack H Noble; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.