Literature DB >> 25527640

Incidence of minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery at National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers.

Heather Yeo1, Joyce Niland1, Dana Milne1, Anna ter Veer1, Tanios Bekaii-Saab1, Jeffrey M Farma1, Lily Lai1, John M Skibber1, William Small1, Neal Wilkinson1, Deborah Schrag1, Martin R Weiser2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy has been shown to have equivalent oncologic outcomes to open colectomy for the management of colon cancer, but its adoption nationally has been slow. This study investigates the prevalence and factors associated with laparoscopic colorectal resection at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) centers.
METHODS: Data on patients undergoing surgery for colon and rectal cancer at NCCN centers from 2005 to 2010 were obtained from chart review of medical records for the NCCN Outcomes Project and included information on socioeconomic status, insurance coverage, comorbidity, and physician-reported Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. Associations between receipt of minimally invasive surgery and patient and clinical variables were analyzed with univariate and multivariable logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: A total of 4032 patients, diagnosed between September 2005 and December 2010, underwent elective colon or rectal resection for cancer at NCCN centers. Median age of colon cancer patients was 62.6 years, and 49% were men. The percent of colon cancer patients treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) increased from 35% in 2006 to 51% in 2010 across all centers but varied statistically significantly between centers. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with minimally invasive surgery for colon cancer patients who had surgery at an NCCN institution were older age (P = .02), male sex (P = .006), fewer comorbidities (P ≤ .001), lower final T-stage (P < .001), median household income greater than or equal to $80000 (P < .001), ECOG performance status = 0 (P = .02), and NCCN institution (P ≤ .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of MIS increased at NCCN centers. However, there was statistically significant variation in adoption of MIS technique among centers.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25527640      PMCID: PMC4296195          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  38 in total

1.  Laparoscopically assisted versus open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; George Tomlinson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Timothy D Jackson; Gilaad G Kaplan; Goffredo Arena; John H Page; Selwyn O Rogers
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision can be performed on a nonselective basis in patients with rectal cancer with excellent medium-term results.

Authors:  D G Glancy; B N Chaudhray; G L Greenslade; A R Dixon
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 4.  Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer.

Authors:  J J Tjandra; M K Y Chan
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Minimally invasive surgery is underutilized for colon cancer.

Authors:  Celia N Robinson; G John Chen; Courtney J Balentine; Shubhada Sansgiry; Christy L Marshall; Daniel A Anaya; Avo Artinyan; Daniel Albo; David H Berger
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2009.

Authors:  Celeste Y Kang; Obaid O Chaudhry; Wissam J Halabi; Vinh Nguyen; Joseph C Carmichael; Michael J Stamos; Steven Mills
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer.

Authors:  In Ja Park; Gyu-Seog Choi; Kyoung Hoon Lim; Byung Mo Kang; Soo Han Jun
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  20 in total

1.  Isolated rectal cancer surgery: a 2007-2014 population study based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Mario Saia; Alessandra Buja; Domenico Mantoan; Gino Sartor; Ferdinando Agresta; Vincenzo Baldo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-04-13

2.  Success rate of natural orifice specimen extraction after laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Authors:  S Karagul; C Kayaalp; F Sumer; I Ertugrul; S Kirmizi; A Tardu; M A Yagci
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Emergent Laparoscopic Colectomy Is an Effective Alternative to Open Resection for Benign and Malignant Diseases: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sun-Bing Xu; Zhong Jia; Yi-Ping Zhu; Ren-Chao Zhang; Ping Wang
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Differences in surgical site infection between laparoscopic colon and rectal surgeries: sub-analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (Japan-Multinational Trial Organization PREV 07-01).

Authors:  Saori Goto; Suguru Hasegawa; Hiroaki Hata; Takashi Yamaguchi; Koya Hida; Ryuta Nishitai; Satoshi Yamanokuchi; Akinari Nomura; Takeharu Yamanaka; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Evolving application of minimally invasive cancer operations at a tertiary cancer center.

Authors:  Luke V Selby; Ronald P DeMatteo; Renee M Tholey; William R Jarnagin; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Paul D Strombom; Peter J Allen; T Peter Kingham; Martin R Weiser; Murray F Brennan; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Minimally invasive colectomy is associated with reduced risk of anastomotic leak and other major perioperative complications and reduced hospital resource utilization as compared with open surgery: a retrospective population-based study of comparative effectiveness and trends of surgical approach.

Authors:  David Wei; Stephen Johnston; Laura Goldstein; Deborah Nagle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Edible Ginger-derived Nano-lipids Loaded with Doxorubicin as a Novel Drug-delivery Approach for Colon Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Mingzhen Zhang; Bo Xiao; Huan Wang; Moon Kwon Han; Zhan Zhang; Emilie Viennois; Changlong Xu; Didier Merlin
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 11.454

8.  Decreased risk of surgery for small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery compared with open surgery: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Kristian Kiim Jensen; Peter Andersen; Rune Erichsen; Thomas Scheike; Lene Hjerrild Iversen; Peter-Martin Krarup
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Current status and implementation of the latest technological innovations.

Authors:  Marta Pascual; Silvia Salvans; Miguel Pera
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Current Status of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  James Fleshman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.