Literature DB >> 21689350

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision can be performed on a nonselective basis in patients with rectal cancer with excellent medium-term results.

D G Glancy1, B N Chaudhray, G L Greenslade, A R Dixon.   

Abstract

AIM: Concerns exist regarding laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery due to increased rates of open conversion, complications and circumferential resection margin positivity. This study reports medium-term results from consecutive unselected cases in a single surgeon series.
METHOD: The results of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer over a 9-year period within the context of an evolving 'enhanced recovery protocol' (ERP) were reviewed from analysis of a prospectively maintained database.
RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients (91 male, median age 69 years, median BMI 26) underwent laparoscopic TME over 9 years. Median follow up was 28.5 months (range 0-88). Sixteen (10.6%) patients underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Six (4.0%) required open conversion and 13 (9.0%) had an anastomotic leakage. The proportion of Dukes stages were: A, 33.3%; B, 30.7%; C, 31.3%; D, 4.7%. Five (3.3%) patients had an R1 and one an R2 resection. Median length of postoperative stay was 6 days. Three (2.0%) patients died within 30 days. Four (2.7%) developed local recurrence and 14 (9.3%) developed distant metastases. Predicted 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates by Kaplan-Meier analysis were 85.8% and 78.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic TME surgery can safely be offered to unselected patients with rectal cancer with excellent medium-term results.
© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21689350     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02682.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  5 in total

1.  Diverting stoma with anterior resection for rectal cancer: does it reduce overall anastomotic leakage and leaks requiring laparotomy?

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Cong; Liang-Hao Hu; Ming Zhong; Lu Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

2.  Influence of conversion on the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer compared with primarily open resection.

Authors:  Alexander Rickert; Florian Herrle; Fabian Doyon; Stefan Post; Peter Kienle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Unselected rectal cancer patients undergoing low anterior resection with defunctioning ileostomy can be safely managed within an Enhanced Recovery Programme.

Authors:  B E Byrne; G Branagan; H S Chave
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Incidence of minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery at National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers.

Authors:  Heather Yeo; Joyce Niland; Dana Milne; Anna ter Veer; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Jeffrey M Farma; Lily Lai; John M Skibber; William Small; Neal Wilkinson; Deborah Schrag; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Systematic review of anastomotic leakage rate according to an international grading system following anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Cong; Liang-Hao Hu; Zheng-Qian Bian; Guang-Yao Ye; Min-Hao Yu; Yun-He Gao; Zhao-Shen Li; En-Da Yu; Ming Zhong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.