Literature DB >> 28299807

Evolving application of minimally invasive cancer operations at a tertiary cancer center.

Luke V Selby1, Ronald P DeMatteo1, Renee M Tholey1, William R Jarnagin1, Julio Garcia-Aguilar1, Paul D Strombom1, Peter J Allen1, T Peter Kingham1, Martin R Weiser1, Murray F Brennan1, Vivian E Strong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients and providers are increasingly interested in the utilization, safety, and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). We reviewed 11 years of MIS resections (laparoscopic and robotic) for intra-abdominal malignancies.
METHODS: Patients who underwent gastrectomy, distal pancreatectomy, hepatic resection, and colorectal resection between 2004 and 2014 were identified. Cases were categorized as open, laparoscopic, and robotic based on the initial operation approach. Diagnostic laparoscopies were excluded.
RESULTS: Of the 10 039 patients who underwent the above procedures, between 2004 and 2014, 2832 (28%) were MIS. In 2004, 12% (100/826) of all resections were performed with MIS approaches, rising to 23% (192/821) of all resections by 2009 and 44% (484/1092) in 2014. The number of open resections has remained largely stable: 726 (88% of all resections) in 2004 and 608 (56% of all resections) in 2014. Initially, laparoscopy experienced incremental adoption. Robotic surgery was implemented in 2009 and is currently the dominant MIS approach, accounting for 76% (368/484) of all MIS resections in 2014. Overall mortality has remained less than 1%.
CONCLUSIONS: While maintaining patient safety, utilization of MIS techniques has increased substantially since 2004, particularly for gastric and colorectal resections. Since 2009 robotic surgery is the predominant MIS approach.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparoscopic surgery; minimally invasive surgery; robotic surgery; surgical oncology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28299807      PMCID: PMC5400711          DOI: 10.1002/jso.24526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  27 in total

1.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases.

Authors:  F Dubois; P Icard; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results.

Authors:  Christophe Laurent; Fabien Leblanc; Philippe Wütrich; Mathieu Scheffler; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer.

Authors:  J J Tjandra; M K Y Chan
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Ethical considerations regarding the implementation of new technologies and techniques in surgery.

Authors:  Vivian E Strong; Kenneth A Forde; Bruce V MacFadyen; John D Mellinger; Peter F Crookes; Lelan F Sillin; Phillip P Shadduck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Heidi Nelson; Shari Gelber; Daniel Sargent; Georgene Schroeder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution's experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches.

Authors:  Ser Yee Lee; Peter J Allen; Eran Sadot; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.

Authors:  Eduardo F Viñuela; Mithat Gonen; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Current role of therapeutic laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in the management of malignancy: a review of trends from a tertiary care cancer center.

Authors:  Chandrakanth Are; Murray F Brennan; Michael D'Angelica; Yuman Fong; Bertrand Guillonneau; William R Jarnagin; Bernard Park; Vivian E Strong; Karim Touijer; Martin Weiser; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Avinash N Supe; Gaurav V Kulkarni; Pradnya A Supe
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Initial experience with hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  M D'Angelica; C Are; W Jarnagin; G DeGregoris; D Coit; D Jaques; M Brennan; Y Fong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

View more
  4 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left pancreatectomy at a high-volume, minimally invasive center.

Authors:  William B Lyman; Michael Passeri; Amit Sastry; Allyson Cochran; David A Iannitti; Dionisios Vrochides; Erin H Baker; John B Martinie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Association between surgical approach and survival following resection of abdominopelvic malignancies.

Authors:  Tarik K Yuce; Ryan J Ellis; Jeanette Chung; Ryan P Merkow; Anthony D Yang; Nathaniel J Soper; Edward J Tanner; Edward M Schaeffer; Karl Y Bilimoria; Gregory B Auffenberg
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Fast and accurate vision-based stereo reconstruction and motion estimation for image-guided liver surgery.

Authors:  Andrew D Speers; Burton Ma; William R Jarnagin; Sharifa Himidan; Amber L Simpson; Richard P Wildes
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2018-10-19

Review 4.  Minimally Invasive Surgery in Pediatric Surgical Oncology.

Authors:  Hannah M Phelps; Harold N Lovvorn
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.