Kristian Kiim Jensen1, Peter Andersen2, Rune Erichsen2, Thomas Scheike3, Lene Hjerrild Iversen2,4, Peter-Martin Krarup5,4. 1. Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen NV, Denmark. mail@kristiankiim.dk. 2. Department of Surgery P, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage-Hansens Gade 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark. 4. Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, Hvidovre, Denmark. 5. Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen NV, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The impact of surgical approach on the incidence of small bowel obstruction (SBO) is unclear. The aim of the current study was to analyze the long-term risk of surgery for SBO after open and laparoscopic surgery and to assess how subsequent SBO surgery impacts on mortality after colonic cancer resection. METHODS: This was a nationwide cohort study of patients undergoing elective colonic cancer resection with primary anastomosis in Denmark between 2001 and 2008. All included patients were operated with curative intent. Patients were identified in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database and followed through May 2014 in the Danish National Patient Register. The primary endpoint was surgery for SBO. Secondarily, mortality among patients who subsequently underwent SBO surgery and those who did not was compared. RESULTS: Among the 8583 included patients, 251 (2.9 %) underwent surgery for SBO during follow-up (median 8.8 years). The 3-year cumulative incidence of SBO surgery was 1.5 %; 1.2 % after laparoscopic and 1.6 % after open surgery. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with a decreased risk of SBO (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61 (CI 0.37 to 0.99, P = 0.048) compared with open surgery. The HR for mortality after colonic resection was 2.54 (CI 1.91 to 3.38, P < 0.001) for patients who underwent subsequent SBO surgery as compared to those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer was associated with a decreased risk of subsequent SBO surgery compared with open surgery. Further, subsequent SBO surgery was associated with increased mortality after colonic cancer resection.
BACKGROUND: The impact of surgical approach on the incidence of small bowel obstruction (SBO) is unclear. The aim of the current study was to analyze the long-term risk of surgery for SBO after open and laparoscopic surgery and to assess how subsequent SBO surgery impacts on mortality after colonic cancer resection. METHODS: This was a nationwide cohort study of patients undergoing elective colonic cancer resection with primary anastomosis in Denmark between 2001 and 2008. All included patients were operated with curative intent. Patients were identified in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database and followed through May 2014 in the Danish National Patient Register. The primary endpoint was surgery for SBO. Secondarily, mortality among patients who subsequently underwent SBO surgery and those who did not was compared. RESULTS: Among the 8583 included patients, 251 (2.9 %) underwent surgery for SBO during follow-up (median 8.8 years). The 3-year cumulative incidence of SBO surgery was 1.5 %; 1.2 % after laparoscopic and 1.6 % after open surgery. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with a decreased risk of SBO (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61 (CI 0.37 to 0.99, P = 0.048) compared with open surgery. The HR for mortality after colonic resection was 2.54 (CI 1.91 to 3.38, P < 0.001) for patients who underwent subsequent SBO surgery as compared to those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer was associated with a decreased risk of subsequent SBO surgery compared with open surgery. Further, subsequent SBO surgery was associated with increased mortality after colonic cancer resection.
Authors: Johnna Schölin; Mark Buunen; Wim Hop; Jaap Bonjer; Bo Anderberg; Miguel Cuesta; Salvadora Delgado; Ainitze Ibarzabal; Marie-Louise Ivarsson; Martin Janson; Antonio Lacy; Johan Lange; Lars Påhlman; Stefan Skullman; Eva Haglind Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-06-11 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2008-12-13 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: S A L Bartels; M S Vlug; M W Hollmann; M G W Dijkgraaf; D T Ubbink; H A Cense; B A van Wagensveld; A F Engel; M F Gerhards; W A Bemelman Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 6.939