Literature DB >> 28409441

Isolated rectal cancer surgery: a 2007-2014 population study based on a large administrative database.

Mario Saia1, Alessandra Buja2, Domenico Mantoan1, Gino Sartor2, Ferdinando Agresta3, Vincenzo Baldo2.   

Abstract

Rectal resection is technically one of the most demanding laparoscopic procedures, requiring additional training and expertise of both surgeons and institutions. The literature has shown that laparoscopic procedures can be appropriate for the treatment of rectal cancer (RC), in terms of safety, outcome and efficiency, but results may not always be directly transferable to the general population. This study aimed to investigate the use of laparoscopic rectal cancer resections in a north-eastern Italian region (the Veneto) and to see how the characteristics of patients and hospitals are associated with the use of laparoscopy. This was a retrospective cohort study based on administrative data collected from 2007 to 2014 in the Veneto region (north-east Italy). In the period considered (2007-2014), 4953 rectal resections were performed for RC in Veneto hospitals, accounting for 35% of the total 14,243 surgical procedures involving the rectum, and resulting in 76,739 days in hospital [mean length of stay-post-operative (MLOS) 15.5 ± 11.1 days]. Patients were a mean 67.9 ± 11.7 years old (68 ± 12.7 for women, 67.9 ± 11 for men), while the subgroup of patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures was on average 2 years younger (66.5 ± 11.8 vs 68.8 ± 11.5; p < 0.05). The four main findings of this study are: (1) the increasing rates of laparoscopic procedures for RC resection at all the hospitals in our geographical area, rising up to 52% in 2014. This is probably related to not only to availability of better equipment but surely to a growing expertise of surgeons; (2) the esteem of proportion of laparoscopically treated RC; (3) the significant difference between the laparoscopic and open surgical approach in terms of mean length of hospital stay after RC resection, making the laparoscopic approach cost-effective generally speaking; and (4) the disparities in hospitals' use of laparoscopy by patients' age group: Laparoscopic surgery is safe also in the elderly population but it is not so widely offers in Veneto Region hospitals, and it's probably due to the lack of experience about this approach in frail/old patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic surgery; Rectal cancer surgery; Rectal surgery technique population-based study; Surgical outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28409441     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-017-0445-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  22 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Matteo Frasson; Clelia Di Serio; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.

Authors:  Marylise Boutros; Neha Hippalgaonkar; Emanuela Silva; Daniela Allende; Steven D Wexner; Mariana Berho
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.

Authors:  Ronald Daher; Elie Chouillard; Yves Panis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Laparoscopic surgery in the elderly: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrew T Bates; Celia Divino
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.745

5.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage I rectal cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Seung Duk Lee; Sung Chan Park; Ji Won Park; Dae Yong Kim; Hyo Seong Choi; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical efficacy.

Authors:  Jun-Kang Zhao; Nan-Zheng Chen; Jian-Bao Zheng; Sai He; Xue-Jun Sun
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11

7.  Incidence of minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery at National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers.

Authors:  Heather Yeo; Joyce Niland; Dana Milne; Anna ter Veer; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Jeffrey M Farma; Lily Lai; John M Skibber; William Small; Neal Wilkinson; Deborah Schrag; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: comparable to conventional oncologic surgery?

Authors:  Ricardo M Bonnor; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

9.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Martijn Hgm van der Pas; Eva Haglind; Miguel A Cuesta; Alois Fürst; Antonio M Lacy; Wim Cj Hop; Hendrik Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Clinical competence in the surgery of rectal cancer: the Italian Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Micaela Piccoli; Piccoli Micaela; Ferdinando Agresta; Agresta Ferdinando; Vincenzo Trapani; Trapani Vincenzo; Casimiro Nigro; Nigro Casimiro; Vito Pende; Pende Vito; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Campanile Fabio Cesare; Nereo Vettoretto; Vettoretto Nereo; Enrico Belluco; Belluco Enrico; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Bianchi Pietro Paolo; Davide Cavaliere; Cavaliere Davide; Giuseppe Ferulano; Ferulano Giuseppe; Filippo La Torre; La Torre Filippo; Marco Maria Lirici; Lirici Marco Maria; Roberto Rea; Rea Roberto; Gianni Ricco; Ricco Gianni; Elena Orsenigo; Orsenigo Elena; Simona Barlera; Barlera Simona; Emanuele Lettieri; Lettieri Emanuele; Giovanni Maria Romano; Romano Giovanni Maria
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  3 in total

1.  Do Diagnostic and Procedure Codes Within Population-Based, Administrative Datasets Accurately Identify Patients with Rectal Cancer?

Authors:  Reilly P Musselman; Tara Gomes; Deanna M Rothwell; Rebecca C Auer; Husein Moloo; Robin P Boushey; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Real-world impact of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  A E Drohan; C M Hoogerboord; P M Johnson; G J Flowerdew; G A Porte
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Optimized Parameters of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Prediction of the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jie Li; Jia Wang; Jing Pang; Shougen Cao; Jingjing Chen; Wenjian Xu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.