Literature DB >> 25502230

The Bouma law of crowding, revised: critical spacing is equal across parts, not objects.

Sarah Rosen1, Ramakrishna Chakravarthi2, Denis G Pelli1.   

Abstract

Crowding is the inability to identify an object among flankers in the periphery. It is due to inappropriate incorporation of features from flanking objects in perception of the target. Crowding is characterized by measuring critical spacing, the minimum distance needed between a target and flankers to allow recognition. The existing Bouma law states that, at a given point and direction in the visual field, critical spacing, measured from the center of a target object to the center of a similar flanking object, is the same for all objects (Pelli & Tillman, 2008). Because flipping an object about its center preserves its center-to-center spacing to other objects, according to the Bouma law, crowding should be unaffected. However, because crowding is a result of feature combination, the location of features within an object might matter. In a series of experiments, we find that critical spacing is affected by the location of features within the flanker. For some flankers, a flip greatly reduces crowding even though it maintains target-flanker spacing and similarity. Our results suggest that the existing Bouma law applies to simple one-part objects, such as a single roman letter or a Gabor patch. Many objects consist of multiple parts; for example, a word is composed of multiple letters that crowd each other. To cope with such complex objects, we revise the Bouma law to say that critical spacing is equal across parts, rather than objects. This accounts for old and new findings.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bouma Law; critical spacing; crowding; feature combination; peripheral vision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25502230      PMCID: PMC4527718          DOI: 10.1167/14.6.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  34 in total

1.  Apparent string shortening concomitant with letter crowding.

Authors:  L Liu; A Arditi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The spatial resolution of visual attention.

Authors:  J Intriligator; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.

Authors:  L Parkes; J Lund; A Angelucci; J A Solomon; M Morgan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Srividhya Hariharan; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size.

Authors:  Srimant P Tripathy; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Eccentric vision: adverse interactions between line segments.

Authors:  J J Andriessen; H Bouma
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Quantifying error distributions in crowding.

Authors:  Deborah Hanus; Edward Vul
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.

Authors:  H Bouma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Contrast masking in human vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; J M Foley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1980-12

10.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02
View more
  16 in total

1.  Crowding, grouping, and object recognition: A matter of appearance.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Bilge Sayim; Vitaly Chicherov; Mauro Manassi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Crowding by a repeating pattern.

Authors:  Sarah Rosen; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The edge of awareness: Mask spatial density, but not color, determines optimal temporal frequency for continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Jan Drewes; Weina Zhu; David Melcher
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Stimulus conflation and tuning selectivity in V4 neurons: a model of visual crowding.

Authors:  Brad C Motter
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Image content is more important than Bouma's Law for scene metamers.

Authors:  Thomas Sa Wallis; Christina M Funke; Alexander S Ecker; Leon A Gatys; Felix A Wichmann; Matthias Bethge
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Visual crowding is unaffected by adaptation-induced spatial compression.

Authors:  Alison Chambers; Alan Johnston; Neil W Roach
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Broad attention uncovers benefits of stimulus uniformity in visual crowding.

Authors:  Koen Rummens; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Crowding in the S-cone pathway.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Seeing number using texture: How summary statistics account for reductions in perceived numerosity in the visual periphery.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The crowding factor method applied to parafoveal vision.

Authors:  Saeideh Ghahghaei; Laura Walker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.