Literature DB >> 7463185

Contrast masking in human vision.

G E Legge, J M Foley.   

Abstract

Contrast masking was studied psychophysically. A two-alternative forced-choice procedure was used to measure contrast thresholds for 2.0 cpd sine-wave gratings in the presence of masking sine-wave gratings. Thresholds were measured for 11 masker contrasts spanning three log units, and seven masker frequencies ranging +/- one octave from the signal frequency. Corresponding measurements were made for gratings with horizontal widths of 0.75 degrees (narrow fields) and 6.0 degrees (wide fields). For high contrast maskers at all frequencies, signal thresholds were related to masking contrast by power functions with exponents near 0.6. For a range of low masking contrasts, signal thresholds were reduced by the masker. For the wide fields, high contrast masking tuning functions peaked at the signal frequency, were slightly asymmetric, and had approximately invariant half-maximum frequencies that lie 3/4 octave below and 1 octave above the signal frequency. The corresponding low contrast tuning functions exhibited peak threshold reduction at the signal frequency, with half-minimum frequencies at roughly +/- 0.25 octaves. For the narrow fields, the masking tuning functions were much broader at both low and high masking contrasts. A masking model is presented that encompasses contrast detection, discrimination, and masking phenomena. Central constructs of the model include a linear spatial frequency filter, a nonlinear transducer, and a process of spatial pooling that acts at low contrasts only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7463185     DOI: 10.1364/josa.70.001458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am        ISSN: 0030-3941


  115 in total

1.  Lateral sensitivity modulation explains the flanker effect in contrast discrimination.

Authors:  C C Chen; C W Tyler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The empirical characteristics of human pattern vision defy theoretically-driven expectations.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Binocular unmasking with unequal interocular contrast: the case for multiple Cyclopean eyes.

Authors:  B Schneider; G Moraglia
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-12

4.  Response suppression in v1 agrees with psychophysics of surround masking.

Authors:  Barbara Zenger-Landolt; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Wohlgemuth was right: distracting attention from the adapting stimulus does not decrease the motion after-effect.

Authors:  Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Perceptual learning improves neural processing in myopic vision.

Authors:  Fang-Fang Yan; Jiawei Zhou; Wuxiao Zhao; Min Li; Jie Xi; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Pooling of first-order inputs in second-order vision.

Authors:  Zachary M Westrick; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Linear systems analysis of the fMRI signal.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Boynton; Stephen A Engel; David J Heeger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The relationship between task performance and functional magnetic resonance imaging response.

Authors:  Giedrius T Buracas; Ione Fine; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Do common mechanisms of adaptation mediate color discrimination and appearance? Uniform backgrounds.

Authors:  James M Hillis; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.