Literature DB >> 25476670

4D flow MRI applications for aortic disease.

Nicholas S Burris1, Michael D Hope2.   

Abstract

Aortic disease is routinely monitored with anatomic imaging, but until the recent advent of 3-directional phase contrast MRI (4D) flow, blood flow abnormalities have gone undetected. 4D flow measures aortic hemodynamic markers quickly. Qualitative flow visualization has spurred the investigation of new quantitative markers. Flow displacement and wall shear stress can quantify the effects of valve-related aortic flow abnormalities. Markers of turbulent and viscous energy loss approximate the increased energetic burden on the ventricle in disease states. This article discusses magnetic resonance flow imaging and highlights new flow-related markers in the context of aortic valve disease, valve-related aortic disease, and aortic wall disease.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4D flow; Aorta; Aortic aneurysm; Bicuspid aortic valve; Flow imaging; Hemodynamic imaging; Phase contrast MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25476670      PMCID: PMC5127263          DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2014.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am        ISSN: 1064-9689            Impact factor:   2.266


  48 in total

1.  Assessment of the accuracy of MRI wall shear stress estimation using numerical simulations.

Authors:  Sven Petersson; Petter Dyverfeldt; Tino Ebbers
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Estimation of aortic pressure waveforms from 4D phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Michael Delles; Fabian Rengier; Yoo-Jin Jeong; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Sebastian Ley; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Rüdiger Dillmann; Roland Unterhinninghofen
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

3.  Imaging biomarkers of aortic disease: increased growth rates with eccentric systolic flow.

Authors:  Michael D Hope; Jarrett Wrenn; Monica Sigovan; Elyse Foster; Elaine E Tseng; David Saloner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection: increasing prevalence and improved outcomes reported in a nationwide population-based study of more than 14,000 cases from 1987 to 2002.

Authors:  Christian Olsson; Stefan Thelin; Elisabeth Ståhle; Anders Ekbom; Fredrik Granath
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Comparison of four-dimensional flow parameters for quantification of flow eccentricity in the ascending aorta.

Authors:  Monica Sigovan; Michael D Hope; Petter Dyverfeldt; David Saloner
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Incidence of aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valves.

Authors:  Hector I Michelena; Amber D Khanna; Douglas Mahoney; Edit Margaryan; Yan Topilsky; Rakesh M Suri; Ben Eidem; William D Edwards; Thoralf M Sundt; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Petter Dyverfeldt; Michael D Hope; Elaine E Tseng; David Saloner
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-01

8.  Semi-automatic quantification of 4D left ventricular blood flow.

Authors:  Jonatan Eriksson; Carl Johan Carlhäll; Petter Dyverfeldt; Jan Engvall; Ann F Bolger; Tino Ebbers
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Plaques in the descending aorta: a new risk factor for stroke? Visualization of potential embolization pathways by 4D MRI.

Authors:  Andreas Harloff; Christoph Strecker; Alex P Frydrychowicz; Patrick Dudler; Andreas Hetzel; Annette Geibel; Marc Kollum; Cornelius Weiller; Jürgen Hennig; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns in surgical management of bicuspid aortopathy: a survey of 100 cardiac surgeons.

Authors:  Subodh Verma; Bobby Yanagawa; Sameer Kalra; Marc Ruel; Mark D Peterson; Michael H Yamashita; Andrew Fagan; Maria E Currie; Christopher W White; Stephane Leung Wai Sang; Cristian Rosu; Steve Singh; Holly Mewhort; Nandini Gupta; Paul W M Fedak
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  12 in total

1.  Fully automated 3D aortic segmentation of 4D flow MRI for hemodynamic analysis using deep learning.

Authors:  Haben Berhane; Michael Scott; Mohammed Elbaz; Kelly Jarvis; Patrick McCarthy; James Carr; Chris Malaisrie; Ryan Avery; Alex J Barker; Joshua D Robinson; Cynthia K Rigsby; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Intraoperative Imaging and Image Fusion for Venous Interventions.

Authors:  Ponraj Chinnadurai; Jean Bismuth
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

3.  Fetal dynamic phase-contrast MR angiography using ultrasound gating and comparison with Doppler ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  B P Schoennagel; J Yamamura; F Kording; R Fischer; P Bannas; G Adam; H Kooijman; C Ruprecht; K Fehrs; M Tavares de Sousa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Vascular Imaging With Ferumoxytol as a Contrast Agent.

Authors:  Michael D Hope; Thomas A Hope; Chengcheng Zhu; Farshid Faraji; Henrik Haraldsson; Karen G Ordovas; David Saloner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  How Well Does an Automated Approach Calculate and Visualize Blood Flow Vorticity at 4D Flow MRI?

Authors:  Michael Markl
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-02-27

6.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: Full online-only version.

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Paul W M Fedak; Elizabeth H Stephens; Thomas G Gleason; Evaldas Girdauskas; John S Ikonomidis; Ali Khoynezhad; Samuel C Siu; Subodh Verma; Michael D Hope; Duke E Cameron; Donald F Hammer; Joseph S Coselli; Marc R Moon; Thoralf M Sundt; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Alessandro Della Corte; Hector I Michelena; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Highly accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI using compressed sensing: Performance at different acceleration factors in patients with aortic disease.

Authors:  Ashitha Pathrose; Liliana Ma; Haben Berhane; Michael B Scott; Kelvin Chow; Christoph Forman; Ning Jin; Ali Serhal; Ryan Avery; James Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Longitudinal Evaluation of Aortic Hemodynamics in Marfan Syndrome: New Insights from a 4D Flow Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Multi-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Julia Geiger; Daniel Hirtler; Kristina Gottfried; Ozair Rahman; Emilie Bollache; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Brigitte Stiller
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  Cell Sources for Tissue Engineering Strategies to Treat Calcific Valve Disease.

Authors:  Eva Jover; Marco Fagnano; Gianni Angelini; Paolo Madeddu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-11-06

10.  On the Role and Effects of Uncertainties in Cardiovascular in silico Analyses.

Authors:  Simona Celi; Emanuele Vignali; Katia Capellini; Emanuele Gasparotti
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.