Literature DB >> 19250241

Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography.

Munetaka Naitoh1, Akiko Hirukawa, Akitoshi Katsumata, Eiichiro Ariji.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Measurements of bone density in designed sites are important in presurgical imaging for dental implant treatment. However, the pixel or voxel values obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CT) images are not absolute values. Hence, the relationship between voxel values obtained from cone-beam CT with a limited-volume exposure field and a flat panel detector and bone mineral densities (BMDs) obtained from multislice CT was evaluated in the mandible.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 16 (four males and 12 females) patients who had undergone imaging for mandibular dental implant treatment using cone-beam CT with Alphard VEGA and multislice CT were enrolled in this investigation. Cross-sectional images of cone-beam and multislice CT were reconstructed, and values of regions of interest (ROIs) in images were calculated.
RESULTS: A high-level correlation between voxel values of cone-beam CT and BMDs of multislice CT was observed (r=0.965).
CONCLUSION: It was suggested that voxel values of mandibular cancellous bone in cone-beam CT could be used to estimate bone density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19250241     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01672.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  30 in total

1.  Effects of orthodontic tooth movement on alveolar bone density.

Authors:  Hsing-Wen Chang; Heng-Li Huang; Jian-Hong Yu; Jui-Ting Hsu; Yu-Fen Li; Yi-Fan Wu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

Authors:  R Pauwels; R Jacobs; S R Singer; M Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Evaluation of trabecular pattern of mandible using fractal dimension, bone area fraction, and gray scale value: comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Guldane Magat; Sevgi Ozcan Sener
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site.

Authors:  A Parsa; N Ibrahim; B Hassan; A Motroni; P van der Stelt; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 5.  Bone mineral density in cone beam computed tomography: Only a few shades of gray.

Authors:  Marcio José da Silva Campos; Thainara Salgueiro de Souza; Sergio Luiz Mota Júnior; Marcelo Reis Fraga; Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28

6.  Imaging of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds using a cone beam computed tomography device on rat calvarial defects with histological verification.

Authors:  Emmanouil Chatzipetros; Zafeiroula Yfanti; Panos Christopoulos; Catherine Donta; Spyros Damaskos; Evangelos Tsiambas; Dimitris Tsiourvas; Eleni-Marina Kalogirou; Konstantinos I Tosios; Kostas Tsiklakis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Derived Alveolar Bone Density Between Subjects with and without Aggressive Periodontitis.

Authors:  Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Eman Y Elfirt; Manea M Al-Ahmari; Ibrahim A Yamany; Maher A Alabdulkarim; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

8.  Can gray values derived from CT and cone beam CT estimate new bone formation? An in vivo study.

Authors:  Farshid Bastami; Shahriar Shahab; Azin Parsa; Fatemeh Mashhadi Abbas; Mohammad Hadi Noori Kooshki; Mahshid Namdari; Hamidreza Azimi Lisar; Tohid Rafiei; Farahnaz Fahimipour; Majid Salehi; Maissa Jafari
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-10-31

9.  Assessment of aging characteristics of female condylar trabecular structure by cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Guangnan Li; Haoliang Qian; Songsong Guo; Dongmiao Wang; Chao Sun; Yifei Du; Jie Cheng; Hongbing Jiang
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations.

Authors:  R Pauwels; O Nackaerts; N Bellaiche; H Stamatakis; K Tsiklakis; A Walker; H Bosmans; R Bogaerts; R Jacobs; K Horner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.