Literature DB >> 25472752

Large fixed-size metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: higher serum metal ion levels in patients with pain.

Christiaan Smeekes1, Bastiaan Ongkiehong, Bart van der Wal, Ron Wolterbeek, Jan-Ferdinand Henseler, Rob Nelissen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recently, concerns have arisen about metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the purpose of this cross-sectional cohort study was to describe the incidence of pain, pseudotumours, revisions and the relation between elevated metal ion levels, functional outcome and quality of life after MoM THA.
METHODS: In 351 patients, 377 MoM THA with a fixed-size 38-mm head were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 30 months (range 11-58). Evaluation included pain, serum metal ions, patient-reported questionnaires (Short Form-36 [SF-36], Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS] and the Oxford Hip Score [OHS]) and radiological imaging. Sixteen patients did not participate in the screening.
RESULTS: One hundred and eighteen (35 %) patients reported pain and showed significantly higher cobalt and chromium levels compared to patients without pain. Median serum cobalt levels were 4.4 μg/l (interquartile range [IQR] 6.6) and chromium levels were 3.6 μg/l (IQR 4.8). Patients with cobalt levels of ≤5 μg/l reported significantly better outcome on the SF-36 and HOOS. Fifty-seven pseudotumours were identified in 227 THAs. A revision rate of 19 % was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, 35 % of the patients experienced pain after MoM THA. These patients showed significantly higher serum metal ion levels. The patient-reported questionnaires indicated significantly better outcome in patients with cobalt levels ≤5 μg/l.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25472752     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2605-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  29 in total

1.  Validation of the Dutch version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score.

Authors:  I B de Groot; M Reijman; C B Terwee; S Bierma-Zeinstra; M M Favejee; E Roos; J A Verhaar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Residual groin pain at a minimum of two years after metal-on-metal THA with a twenty-eight-millimeter femoral head, THA with a large-diameter femoral head, and hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Martin Lavigne; Jean-Michel Laffosse; Muthu Ganapathi; Julien Girard; Pascal Vendittoli
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips.

Authors:  D L Back; R Dalziel; D Young; A Shimmin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-03

4.  Sensitivity and specificity of blood cobalt and chromium metal ions for predicting failure of metal-on-metal hip replacement.

Authors:  A J Hart; S A Sabah; A S Bandi; P Maggiore; P Tarassoli; B Sampson; J A Skinner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-10

5.  No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Wierd P Zijlstra; Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Mark J M Zee; Jos J A M van Raay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure.

Authors:  David Fabi; Brett Levine; Wayne Paprosky; Craig Della Valle; Scott Sporer; Gregg Klein; Harlan Levine; Mark Hartzband
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 1.390

7.  The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  A J Hart; S Sabah; J Henckel; A Lewis; J Cobb; B Sampson; A Mitchell; J A Skinner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-06

8.  A prospective study concerning the relationship between metal allergy and post-operative pain following total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yirong Zeng; Wenjun Feng; Jie Li; Lu Lu; Chuntao Ma; Jianchun Zeng; Feilong Li; Xinyu Qi; Yueguang Fan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Which functional assessments predict long-term wear after total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan K Takenaga; John J Callaghan; Nicholas A Bedard; Steve S Liu; Yubo Gao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Anna K Nilsdotter; L Stefan Lohmander; Maria Klässbo; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinical significance of corrosion of cemented femoral stems in metal-on-metal hips: a retrieval study.

Authors:  Harry S Hothi; Reshid Berber; Andreas C Panagiotopoulos; Robert K Whittaker; Camilla Rhead; John A Skinner; Alister J Hart
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Outcomes of total joint arthroplasty in patients with depression: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sravya P Vajapey; John F McKeon; Chad A Krueger; Andrew I Spitzer
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-03

3.  Current Pathologic Scoring Systems for Metal-on-metal THA Revisions are not Reproducible.

Authors:  Christiaan Smeekes; Arjen H G Cleven; Bart C H van der Wal; Stefan V Dubois; Remigio W Rouse; Bastiaan F Ongkiehong; Ron Wolterbeek; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Olli Lainiala; Petra Elo; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Pseudotumor in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a comparison study of three grading systems with MRI.

Authors:  C Smeekes; B J M Schouten; M Nix; B F Ongkiehong; R Wolterbeek; B C H van der Wal; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.