Literature DB >> 15773639

Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips.

D L Back1, R Dalziel, D Young, A Shimmin.   

Abstract

We describe the experience with the first consecutive 230 Birmingham hip resurfacings at our centre. At a mean follow-up of three years (25 to 52 months) survivorship was 99.14% with revision in one patient for a loose acetabular component and one death from unrelated causes. One patient developed a fracture of the femoral neck at six weeks which united unremarkably after a period of non-weight-bearing. The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 62.54 (8 to 92) to 97.74 (61 to 100). The mean flexion improved from 91.52 degrees (25 to 140) to 110.41 degrees (80 to 145). Most patients (97%) considered the outcome to be good or excellent. Our preliminary experience with this implant is encouraging and the results are superior to the earlier generation of resurfacings for the same length of follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15773639     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b3.15556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  56 in total

1.  Is metal-on-metal squeaking related to acetabular angle of inclination?

Authors:  Thomas Bernasek; David Fisher; David Dalury; Melissa Levering; Kirk Dimitris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Profunda femoris pseudoaneurysm following Birmingham hip resurfacing: an important differential diagnosis for a periarticular cystic mass.

Authors:  M S Thomas; J N O'Hara; A M Davies; Steven L J James
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Daniel Neumann; Rauend Rauf; Jochen Hofstaetter; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Improved mechanical long-term reliability of hip resurfacing prostheses by using silicon nitride.

Authors:  Wen Zhang; M Titze; B Cappi; D C Wirtz; R Telle; H Fischer
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Does a plastic drape reduce incidence of heterotopic ossification after hip resurfacing?

Authors:  John S Shields; Ali Mofidi; William G Ward; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  [Results for endoprosthetic care in patients younger than 50 years].

Authors:  J Ziegler; M Amlang; M Bottesi; S Kirschner; W-C Witzleb; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Dislocation as a rare complication of resurfacing of the hip joint. Case report and meta-analysis].

Authors:  S Lieske; M John; C Rimasch; K Mahlfeld
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us?

Authors:  Kristoff Corten; Steven J MacDonald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  [Metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing. Development and current state].

Authors:  M Hoberg; M J Le Duff; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Use of patient-specific templates in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: experience from sixteen cases.

Authors:  Hao Du; Xiao-xiao Tian; Tong-sen Li; Jin-sheng Yang; Ke-han Li; Guo-xian Pei; Le Xie
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.