Literature DB >> 24910214

A prospective study concerning the relationship between metal allergy and post-operative pain following total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Yirong Zeng1, Wenjun Feng, Jie Li, Lu Lu, Chuntao Ma, Jianchun Zeng, Feilong Li, Xinyu Qi, Yueguang Fan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prospective study was conducted to detect whether a relationship exists between metal allergy and post-operative pain in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients. We postulated that to some extent a relationship does exist between them.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had undergone total hip and knee arthroplasty surgery because of hip and knee disease were included. The exclusion criteria were patients who were treated with immunosuppressor two weeks pre-operatively, skin conditions around the patch testing site, and other uncontrollable factors. Each patient agreed to patch testing for three days before surgery. Photographic images before patch testing, two and three days after patch testing were obtained to evaluate the final incidence of metal allergy. The patch tests contained 12 metal elements; chromium, cobalt, nickel, molybdenum, titanium, aluminium, vanadium, iron, manganese, tin, zirconium, and copper. Two independent observers evaluated the images. The results were divided into a non-metal allergy group and a metal allergy group. Pre-operative and postoperative VAS score, lymphocyte transforming test, and X-rays were collected to detect the relationship between metal allergy and post-operative pain following total hip and knee arthroplasty.
RESULTS: There were 96 patients who underwent pre-operative patch testing. The overall metal allergy rate was 51.1% (49/96) in our study. Nickel, cobalt, manganese, and tin were the most common allergic metal elements in our study. Nine inappropriate cases were excluded, and 87 patients were finally included in our study. There were 36 metal allergy and 26 non-metal allergy patients in the THA group, while 11 metal allergy and 14 non-metal allergy patients were found in the TKA group. We found no relationship existed between metal allergy and post-surgery pain in total hip and knee arthroplasty.
CONCLUSION: Pain caused by metal allergy usually presents as persistent and recurrent pain. The white cell count, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and postoperative radiographs were not affected. Currently, patch testing and lymphocyte transforming tests are used for metal allergy diagnosis. We deemed that a relationship between post-surgery pain and metal allergy in total hip and knee patients may exist to some extent. Larger samples and longer follow-up time are essential for further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24910214     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2367-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  39 in total

1.  Retroperitoneal migration of a septically loose femoral component.

Authors:  Serhan Yagdi; Cemal Kazimoglu; Berna Dirim; Tugrul Bulut; Muhittin Sener
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Functional and Emotional Results Differ After Aseptic vs Septic Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Friedrich Boettner; Michael B Cross; Denis Nam; Tobias Kluthe; Miriam Schulte; Christian Goetze
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-06-11

Review 3.  Pragmatic approach to the clinical work-up of patients with putative allergic disease to metallic orthopaedic implants before and after surgery.

Authors:  J P Thyssen; T Menné; P C Schalock; J S Taylor; H I Maibach
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  Management of a partially edentulous patient with malpositioned implants, using all-ceramic abutments and all-ceramic restorations: A clinical report.

Authors:  Renee E Duff; Michael E Razzoog
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Epidemiology of contact allergy: an estimation of morbidity employing the clinical epidemiology and drug-utilization research (CE-DUR) approach.

Authors:  A Schnuch; W Uter; J Geier; O Gefeller
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Revision total knee arthroplasty for septic versus aseptic failure.

Authors:  Ashok Rajgopal; Attique Vasdev; Himanshu Gupta; Vivek Dahiya
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.118

7.  Cutaneous complications of orthopedic implants. A two-year prospective study.

Authors:  R Kubba; J S Taylor; K E Marks
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1981-09

8.  Four years of clinical experience with an adverse reaction unit for dental biomaterials.

Authors:  Jan Sverre Vamnes; Gunvor Bentung Lygre; Arne Geir Grönningsaeter; Nils Roar Gjerdet
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.383

9.  Retrospective evaluation of patch testing before or after metal device implantation.

Authors:  Kurtis B Reed; Mark D P Davis; Krystal Nakamura; Linda Hanson; Donna M Richardson
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2008-08

Review 10.  Painful prosthesis: approaching the patient with persistent pain following total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Prisco Piscitelli; Giovanni Iolascon; Massimo Innocenti; Roberto Civinini; Alessandro Rubinacci; Maurizio Muratore; Michele D'Arienzo; Paolo Tranquilli Leali; Anna Maria Carossino; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-05
View more
  9 in total

1.  A case series of cementless revision total knee arthroplasty in patients with benzoyl peroxide allergy.

Authors:  Frank S Fröschen; Nadine Gravius; Jan-Frederic Lau; Thomas Martin Randau; Eva Kaup; Max J Friedrich; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Allergy in Total Knee Replacement. Does It Exist?: Review Article.

Authors:  Martin Faschingbauer; Lisa Renner; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-07-22

3.  Large fixed-size metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: higher serum metal ion levels in patients with pain.

Authors:  Christiaan Smeekes; Bastiaan Ongkiehong; Bart van der Wal; Ron Wolterbeek; Jan-Ferdinand Henseler; Rob Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Allergic reactions in arthroplasty: myth or serious problem?

Authors:  Daniel Guenther; Peter Thomas; Daniel Kendoff; Mohamed Omar; Thorsten Gehrke; Carl Haasper
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [Adverse reactions to metal orthopedic implants after knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Thomsen; V Krenn; P Thomas
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 6.  [The Berlin diagnostic algorithm for painful knee TKA].

Authors:  K Thiele; J Fussi; C Perka; T Pfitzner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  The association between metal allergy, total knee arthroplasty, and revision: study based on the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Henrik J Münch; Stig S Jacobsen; Jens T Olesen; Torkil Menné; Kjeld Søballe; Jeanne D Johansen; Jacob P Thyssen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Increased risk of eczema after joint replacement: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Po-Yuan Wu; Chih-Hsin Muo; Chun-Hao Tsai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  The effect of Nickel hypersensitivity on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty and the value of skin patch testing: a systematic review.

Authors:  C J H Peacock; H Fu; V Asopa; N D Clement; D Kader; D H Sochart
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-09-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.