Literature DB >> 23568677

Which functional assessments predict long-term wear after total hip arthroplasty?

Ryan K Takenaga1, John J Callaghan, Nicholas A Bedard, Steve S Liu, Yubo Gao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature concerning functional assessment at long-term followup of THAs in general and in young patients specifically. Functional data may be useful in determining differences in the performance of various implants and surgical techniques in THA. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to evaluate a group of young patients who were still active 10 years after THA to determine (1) which functional tests and (2) which patient-reported outcome assessments predicted long-term THA function, as measured by acetabular UHMWPE wear, and (3) whether medical comorbidities influenced patient performance on activity tests and patient outcome questionnaires.
METHODS: Fifty patients (58 hips) 50 years and younger at the time of THA were followed clinically and radiographically for a minimum of 10 years. All patients wore step activity monitors for up to 21 days, performed 6-minute walk (6-MW) tests, and every patient had minimum 10-year radiographs and sequential radiographs evaluated for wear using edge detection techniques. Mean age and BMI at surgery were 39 years and 29 kg/m(2), respectively.
RESULTS: Patients who walked more as determined by step activity monitor (average daily steps) had more linear acetabular UHMWPE wear per year and more volumetric wear per year. The 6-MW, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), and Tegner Lysholm scores did not correlate with acetabular wear. Mean 6-MW distance was 335 m and pedometer data averaged 1.56 million steps per year. Average UCLA and Tegner Lysholm scores were 6 and 3, respectively. Mean linear wear rate was 0.266 mm/year; mean volumetric wear rate was 82.6 mm(3)/year. The number of comorbid medical conditions had a detrimental effect on our activity parameters and outcomes questionnaires, but the relationships were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Of functional tools measured, only pedometer data correlated with THA polyethylene wear. Obtaining pedometer data should be considered when trying to distinguish differences in various hip arthroplasty designs and techniques over the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23568677      PMCID: PMC3705069          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2968-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  30 in total

1.  The multifactorial nature of polyethylene wear in vivo.

Authors:  T P Schmalzried; F J Dorey; H McKellop
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Wear in total hip and knee replacements.

Authors:  T P Schmalzried; J J Callaghan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Digital edge-detection measurement of polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S M Shaver; T D Brown; S L Hillis; J J Callaghan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip or knee replacement.

Authors:  T P Schmalzried; E S Szuszczewicz; M R Northfield; K H Akizuki; R E Frankel; G Belcher; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Validation study of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities VA3.0 Osteoarthritis Index.

Authors:  N Bellamy; J Campbell; J Stevens; L Pilch; C Stewart; Z Mahmood
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; M J Sullivan; P J Thompson; E L Fallen; S O Pugsley; D W Taylor; L B Berman
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Assessing activity in joint replacement patients.

Authors:  C A Zahiri; T P Schmalzried; E S Szuszczewicz; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  In vivo wear of polyethylene acetabular components.

Authors:  J M Kabo; J S Gebhard; G Loren; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03

10.  Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults.

Authors:  P L Enright; D L Sherrill
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 21.405

View more
  7 in total

1.  Large fixed-size metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: higher serum metal ion levels in patients with pain.

Authors:  Christiaan Smeekes; Bastiaan Ongkiehong; Bart van der Wal; Ron Wolterbeek; Jan-Ferdinand Henseler; Rob Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Are younger patients undergoing THA appropriately characterized as active?

Authors:  James A Keeney; Ryan M Nunley; Geneva R Baca; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Monitoring Patient Recovery After THA or TKA Using Mobile Technology.

Authors:  Stephen Lyman; Chisa Hidaka; Kara Fields; Wasif Islam; David Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-02-12

4.  Amount and type of physical activity and sports from one year forward after hip or knee arthroplasty-A systematic review.

Authors:  Yvet Mooiweer; Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Martin Stevens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sequentially Irradiated and Annealed Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene: Linear Vector and Volumetric Wear in Total Hip Arthroplasty at 10 Years.

Authors:  Ethan A Remily; Scott J Douglas; Oliver C Sax; Sahir S Pervaiz; Nequesha S Mohamed; Wayne A Wilkie; Langan S Smith; James Nace; Arthur L Malkani; Charles E Jaggard; Frank R Kolisek; Ronald E Delanois
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-09-09

6.  Early improvement in physical activity and function after total hip arthroplasty: Predictors of outcomes.

Authors:  Tuba Güler; Filiz Sivas; Fatma Gül Yurdakul; Ersin Çelen; Ali Utkan; Bedriye Başkan; Hatice Bodur; Bülent Özkurt
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-22

7.  Surrogate markers of long-term outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  T T Malak; J A J Broomfield; A J R Palmer; S Hopewell; A Carr; C Brown; D Prieto-Alhambra; S Glyn-Jones
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.853

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.