O H Frazier1, Andrew C W Baldwin2, Zumrut T Demirozu2, Ana Maria Segura2, Ruben Hernandez2, Heinrich Taegtmeyer3, Hari Mallidi2, William E Cohn2. 1. Department of Cardiopulmonary Transplantation and the Center for Cardiac Support, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: ischwenke@texasheart.org. 2. Department of Cardiopulmonary Transplantation and the Center for Cardiac Support, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The potential for myocardial reconditioning and device explantation after long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support presents an opportunity to delay or avoid transplantation in select patients. METHODS: Thirty of 657 patients with end-stage heart failure supported with continuous-flow LVADs were assessed for device explantation. Each patient underwent an individualized process of weaning focused on principles of ventricular unloading, gradual reconditioning, and transition to medical therapy. RESULTS: After varying reconditioning periods, 27 patients (16 men, 11 women; age, 39 ± 12 years) underwent LVAD explant, and 3 patients (2 men, 1 woman; age, 22 ± 6 years) were evaluated for explantation but could not be weaned. The duration of LVAD support was 533 ± 424 days (range, 42-1,937 days) for the explant cohort and 1,097 ± 424 days (range, 643-1,483) for the non-explant cohort. The LV end-diastolic dimension, LV ejection fraction, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac output, and cardiac index in the explant cohort were significantly improved at explantation (all, p < 0.05). Two late deaths occurred after LVAD explantation despite satisfactory native cardiac function, and 1 patient required resumption of LVAD support 2.7 years after device removal. The remaining explant patients remain in New York Heart Association classes I to II with medical management alone (mean survival post-explant, 1,172 ± 948 days). The 3 candidates who could not be weaned ultimately underwent transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for recovery of native LV function after long-term continuous-flow LVAD support should encourage a more aggressive approach to ventricular reconditioning with the goal of device explantation and a return to medical management, particularly in young patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND: The potential for myocardial reconditioning and device explantation after long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support presents an opportunity to delay or avoid transplantation in select patients. METHODS: Thirty of 657 patients with end-stage heart failure supported with continuous-flow LVADs were assessed for device explantation. Each patient underwent an individualized process of weaning focused on principles of ventricular unloading, gradual reconditioning, and transition to medical therapy. RESULTS: After varying reconditioning periods, 27 patients (16 men, 11 women; age, 39 ± 12 years) underwent LVAD explant, and 3 patients (2 men, 1 woman; age, 22 ± 6 years) were evaluated for explantation but could not be weaned. The duration of LVAD support was 533 ± 424 days (range, 42-1,937 days) for the explant cohort and 1,097 ± 424 days (range, 643-1,483) for the non-explant cohort. The LV end-diastolic dimension, LV ejection fraction, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac output, and cardiac index in the explant cohort were significantly improved at explantation (all, p < 0.05). Two late deaths occurred after LVAD explantation despite satisfactory native cardiac function, and 1 patient required resumption of LVAD support 2.7 years after device removal. The remaining explant patients remain in New York Heart Association classes I to II with medical management alone (mean survival post-explant, 1,172 ± 948 days). The 3 candidates who could not be weaned ultimately underwent transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for recovery of native LV function after long-term continuous-flow LVAD support should encourage a more aggressive approach to ventricular reconditioning with the goal of device explantation and a return to medical management, particularly in young patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
Authors: David J Farrar; William R Holman; Lawrence R McBride; Robert L Kormos; Timothy B Icenogle; Paul J Hendry; Charles H Moore; Daniel Y Loisance; Aly El-Banayosy; Howard Frazier Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Daniel J Goldstein; Simon Maybaum; Thomas E MacGillivray; Stephanie A Moore; Roberta Bogaev; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2012-03-10 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Emma J Birks; Robert S George; Mike Hedger; Toufan Bahrami; Penny Wilton; Christopher T Bowles; Carole Webb; Robert Bougard; Mohammed Amrani; Magdi H Yacoub; Gilles Dreyfus; Asghar Khaghani Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-01-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mark S Slaughter; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; David Feldman; Benjamin Sun; Antone J Tatooles; Reynolds M Delgado; James W Long; Thomas C Wozniak; Waqas Ghumman; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael Dandel; Yuguo Weng; Henryk Siniawski; Alexander Stepanenko; Thomas Krabatsch; Evgenij Potapov; Hans B Lehmkuhl; Christoph Knosalla; Roland Hetzer Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-10-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Marcel Ricklefs; Chinmay Deodhar; Anamika Chatterjee; Christina Feldmann; Jasmin S Hanke; Jan Heimeshoff; Constanze Merz; Ezin Deniz; Guenes Dogan; Axel Haverich; Jan D Schmitto Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Veli K Topkara; A Reshad Garan; Barry Fine; Amandine F Godier-Furnémont; Alexander Breskin; Barbara Cagliostro; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Donna M Mancini; Yoshifumi Naka; Paolo C Colombo Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Alexander Kushnir; Gaetano Santulli; Steven R Reiken; Ellie Coromilas; Sarah J Godfrey; Danielle L Brunjes; Paolo C Colombo; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Seth I Sokol; Richard N Kitsis; Andrew R Marks Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Eleanor F Gerhard; Lu Wang; Ramesh Singh; Stephan Schueler; Leonard D Genovese; Andrew Woods; Daniel Tang; Nicola Robinson Smith; Mitchell A Psotka; Sian Tovey; Shashank S Desai; Djordje G Jakovljevic; Guy A MacGowan; Palak Shah Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 10.247