Literature DB >> 11265844

Bridging-to-recovery.

R Hetzer1, J H Müller, Y Weng, R Meyer, M Dandel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage heart failure placed on a cardiac assist device show at least some degree of improvement of cardiac function. In a subgroup of selected patients, some hearts recovered considerable function. In these patients the device was removed and cardiac transplantation was no longer necessary. We report our long-term experience with these weaned patients.
METHODS: As of today, 512 cardiac assist devices of various types (Berlin Heart, Berlin, Germany; Novacor, World Heart, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; TCI, ThermoCardio Systems, Inc, Woburn, MA; DeBakey, Micromed Technology Inc, Houston, TX) were implanted in patients with end-stage heart failure in our institution. Of these, 95 patients belonged to a subgroup of patients with nonischemic, idiopathic, dilated cardiomyopathy who were implanted with a left ventricular support system (Novacor 84, TCI 10, Berlin Heart 1) between 1994 and 2000. All were routinely examined by echocardiography for improvement of cardiac function. The left ventricular diameter in diastole (LVIDd) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) served as the main parameters to assess changes in cardiac performance. Under the conditions of a running device, an LVIDd below 60 mm and an LVEF above 40% were the criteria to do further echocardiographic studies when the pump was turned off for up to 20 minutes.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (26 men, 2 women; ages 18 to 64 yrs; history of heart failure, 1 to 17 yrs) fulfilled the criteria of improved cardiac performance and were weaned from the device. Since then, 16 patients have continued "normal" heart function with follow-up times ranging from 1 month to 5.5 years (group B). Three patients died of noncardiac causes (group C). Eight patients were transplanted from 1 to 17 months later and one died on the waiting list (group A). Statistically significant differences between groups A and B were calculated for the duration of heart failure (9 versus 2 years, p = 0.0002). Differences in LVIDd before removal of the device (57 versus 51 mm, p = 0.0420), LVEF after 2 months of unloading (30 versus 49%, p = 0.0300), and LVEF preexplantation (43 versus 52%, p = 0.0001) were significant. Overall, 17% of the cohort of 95 patients were weaned successfully.
CONCLUSIONS: Weaning from cardiac assist devices is feasible for selected patients; it saves donor hearts and is preferred to cardiac transplantation. However, as of today no reliable parameter predicts outcome after weaning and none determines the possibility of device removal before implantation in advance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11265844     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02638-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  18 in total

Review 1.  Ventricular assist devices: destination therapy or just another stop on the road?

Authors:  Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2004 Apr-May

2.  Left ventricular assist system through the left ventricle for acute myocardial infarction: report of a case.

Authors:  Hiroki Hata; Goro Matsumiya; Yoshiki Sawa; Norihide Fukushima; Osamu Monta; Hikaru Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  [Heart diseases in pregnancy].

Authors:  Vera Regitz-Zagrosek; Christa Gohlke-Bärwolf; Annette Geibel-Zehender; Markus Haass; Harald Kaemmerer; Irmtraut Kruck; Christoph Nienaber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Left ventricular remodeling and myocardial recovery on mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Marc A Simon; Brian A Primack; Jeffrey Teuteberg; Robert L Kormos; Christian Bermudez; Yoshiya Toyoda; Hemal Shah; John Gorcsan; Dennis M McNamara
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.712

5.  Heart failure in remission for more than 13 years after removal of a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Ana Maria Segura; Lamia Dris; Edward K Massin; Fred J Clubb; L Maximilian Buja; O H Frazier; Heinrich Taegtmeyer
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-08-01

6.  Circadian variation of motor current observed in fixed rotation speed continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Kenji Suzuki; Tomohiro Nishinaka; Takuma Miyamoto; Yuki Ichihara; Kenji Yamazaki
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 1.731

7.  Evaluation of platelet aggregability during left ventricular bypass using a MedTech MagLev VAD in a series of chronic calf experiments.

Authors:  Taro Kimura; Yoshimasa Yokoyama; Daisuke Sakota; Eiki Nagaoka; Takashi Kitao; Kazuo Takakuda; Setsuo Takatani
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 8.  Left ventricular assist devices and other devices for end-stage heart failure: utility of echocardiography.

Authors:  James N Kirkpatrick; Susan E Wiegers; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Ventricular reconditioning and pump explantation in patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  O H Frazier; Andrew C W Baldwin; Zumrut T Demirozu; Ana Maria Segura; Ruben Hernandez; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Hari Mallidi; William E Cohn
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 10.  Surgical methods to reverse left ventricular remodeling.

Authors:  Michele De Bonis; Ottavio Alfieri
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2007-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.