Literature DB >> 34479776

LVAD decommissioning for myocardial recovery: Long-term ventricular remodeling and adverse events.

Eleanor F Gerhard1, Lu Wang2, Ramesh Singh3, Stephan Schueler4, Leonard D Genovese5, Andrew Woods4, Daniel Tang3, Nicola Robinson Smith4, Mitchell A Psotka5, Sian Tovey4, Shashank S Desai5, Djordje G Jakovljevic6, Guy A MacGowan2, Palak Shah7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) mechanically unload the heart and coupled with neurohormonal therapy can promote reverse cardiac remodeling and myocardial recovery. Minimally invasive LVAD decommissioning with the device left in place has been reported to be safe over short-term follow-up. Whether device retention reduces long-term safety, or sustainability of recovery is unknown.
METHODS: This is a dual-center retrospective analysis of patients who had achieved responder status (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF ≥40% and left ventricular internal diastolic diameter, LVIDd ≤6.0 cm) and underwent elective LVAD decommissioning for myocardial recovery from May 2010 to January 2020. All patients had outflow graft closure and driveline resection with the LVAD left in place. Emergent LVAD decommissioning for an infection or device thrombosis was excluded. Patients were followed with serial echocardiography for up to 3-years. The primary clinical outcome was survival free of heart failure hospitalization, LVAD reimplantation, or transplant.
RESULTS: During the study period 515 patients received an LVAD and 29 (5.6%) achieved myocardial recovery, 12 patients underwent total device explantation or urgent device decommissioning, 17 patients underwent elective LVAD decommissioning, and were included in the analysis. Median age of patients at LVAD implantation was 42 years (interquartile range, IQR: 25-54 years), all had a nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 5 (29%) were female. At LVAD implantation, median LVEF was 10% (IQR: 5%-15%), and LVIDd 6.6 cm (IQR: 5.8-7.1 cm). There were 11 hydrodynamically levitated centrifugal-flow (65%), and 6 axial-flow LVADs (35%). The median duration of LVAD support before decommissioning was 28.7 months (range 13.5-36.2 months). As compared to the turndown study parameters, 1-month post-decommissioning, median LVEF decreased from 55% to 48% (p = 0.03), and LVIDd increased from 4.8 cm to 5.2 cm (p = 0.10). There was gradual remodeling until 6 months, after which there was no statistical difference on follow-up through 3-years (LVEF 42%, LVIDd 5.6 cm). Recurrent infections affected 41% of patients leading to 3 deaths and 1 complete device explant. Recurrent HF occurred in 1 patient who required a transplant. Probability of survival free of HF, LVAD, or transplant was 94% at 1-year, and 78% at 3-years.
CONCLUSIONS: LVAD decommissioning for myocardial recovery was associated with excellent long-term survival free from recurrent heart failure and preservation of ventricular size and function up to 3-years. Reducing the risk of recurrent infections, remains an important therapeutic goal for this management strategy.
Copyright © 2021 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LVAD, myocardial recovery; heart failure; mechanical circulatory support; mechanical unloading; reverse cardiac remodeling

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34479776      PMCID: PMC8627486          DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  36 in total

1.  A titanium plug simplifies left ventricular assist device removal after myocardial recovery.

Authors:  Evgenij V Potapov; Alexander Stepanenko; Ewald Hennig; Roland Hetzer; Thomas Krabatsch
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  Myocardial Recovery in Patients Receiving Contemporary Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Results From the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS).

Authors:  Veli K Topkara; A Reshad Garan; Barry Fine; Amandine F Godier-Furnémont; Alexander Breskin; Barbara Cagliostro; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Donna M Mancini; Yoshifumi Naka; Paolo C Colombo
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 8.790

3.  Virtual Fitting and Hemodynamic Simulation of the EVAHEART 2 Left Ventricular Assist Device and Double-Cuff Tipless Inflow Cannula.

Authors:  Simon Johannes Sonntag; Erin Lipinski; Michael Neidlin; Kristin Hugenroth; Robert Benkowski; Tadashi Motomura; Tim Arne Simon Kaufmann
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Polymerase Chain Reaction to Detect Infections in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Felix Schoenrath; Laura Kursawe; Gaik Nersesian; Judith Kikhney; Julia Schmidt; Frank Barthel; Friedrich Kaufmann; Jan Knierim; Christoph Knosalla; Felix Hennig; Volkmar Falk; Evgenij Potapov; Annette Moter
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  Ventricular reconditioning and pump explantation in patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  O H Frazier; Andrew C W Baldwin; Zumrut T Demirozu; Ana Maria Segura; Ruben Hernandez; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Hari Mallidi; William E Cohn
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Myocardial Recovery Strategy with Decommissioning for the HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Guy A MacGowan; Neil Wrightson; Nicola Robinson-Smith; Andrew Woods; Gareth Parry; Kate Gould; Stephan Schueler
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

7.  Stroke and death risk in ventricular assist device patients varies by ISHLT infection category: An INTERMACS analysis.

Authors:  Palak Shah; Sarah E Birk; Lauren B Cooper; Mitchell A Psotka; James K Kirklin; Scott D Barnett; Shalika B Katugaha; Sheila Phillips; Mary M Looby; Francis D Pagani; Jennifer A Cowger
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  A novel, catheter-based approach to left ventricular assist device deactivation after myocardial recovery.

Authors:  Sanford M Zeigler; Ahmad Y Sheikh; Peter H U Lee; Jay Desai; Dipanjan Banerjee; Philip Oyer; Michael D Dake; Richard V Ha
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Framework to Classify Reverse Cardiac Remodeling With Mechanical Circulatory Support: The Utah-Inova Stages.

Authors:  Palak Shah; Mitchell Psotka; Iosif Taleb; Rami Alharethi; Mortada A Shams; Omar Wever-Pinzon; Michael Yin; Federica Latta; Josef Stehlik; James C Fang; Guoqing Diao; Ramesh Singh; Naila Ijaz; Christos P Kyriakopoulos; Wei Zhu; Christopher W May; Lauren B Cooper; Shashank S Desai; Craig H Selzman; Abdallah G Kfoury; Stavros G Drakos
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 8.790

10.  Heart failure reversal by ventricular unloading in patients with chronic cardiomyopathy: criteria for weaning from ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Michael Dandel; Yuguo Weng; Henryk Siniawski; Alexander Stepanenko; Thomas Krabatsch; Evgenij Potapov; Hans B Lehmkuhl; Christoph Knosalla; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Update on the Practical Role of Echocardiography in Selection, Implantation, and Management of Patients Requiring Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.

Authors:  Aashish Katapadi; Matt Umland; Bijoy K Khandheria
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.955

2.  Results from a multicentre evaluation of plug use for left ventricular assist device explantation.

Authors:  Evgenij V Potapov; Nikolaos Politis; Matthias Karck; Michael Weyand; René Tandler; Thomas Walther; Fabian Emrich; Hermann Reichenspurrner; Alexander Bernhardt; Markus J Barten; Peter Svenarud; Jan Gummert; Davorin Sef; Torsten Doenst; Dmytro Tsyganenko; Antonio Loforte; Felix Schoenrath; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-03-31

3.  Percutaneous Decommissioning of a Left Ventricular Assist Device in a Patient With Myocardial Recovery.

Authors:  Pankaj Jain; Michael S Kiernan; Gregory S Couper; Ethan Y Brovman; Samantha R Asber; Carey Kimmelstiel
Journal:  JACC Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-16

Review 4.  Novel Targets for a Combination of Mechanical Unloading with Pharmacotherapy in Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Agata Jedrzejewska; Alicja Braczko; Ada Kawecka; Marcin Hellmann; Piotr Siondalski; Ewa Slominska; Barbara Kutryb-Zajac; Magdi H Yacoub; Ryszard T Smolenski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Percutaneous approach to left ventricular assist device decommissioning.

Authors:  Francesco Moroni; Keyur B Shah; Mohammed A Quader; Katherine Klein; Melissa C Smallfield; Kendall E Parris; Zachary M Gertz
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.585

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.