Literature DB >> 22555270

Young patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy have higher likelihood of left ventricular recovery during left ventricular assist device support.

Daniel J Goldstein1, Simon Maybaum, Thomas E MacGillivray, Stephanie A Moore, Roberta Bogaev, David J Farrar, O Howard Frazier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recovery of ventricular function during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support allowing device explantation occurs infrequently. We explored the hypothesis that certain patient profiles are more likely to exhibit LV recovery during LVAD support. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A retrospective analysis of data from the HeartMate II bridge to transplant (BTT) and destination therapy (DT) trials was conducted, including 490 BTT, 600 DT, and 18 compassionate-use patients. Of the 1,108 patients, 20 (1.8%; 10 BTT, 10 DT) were explanted owing to LV recovery. The median age was 33 years, and 12 patients (60%) were <40 years of age. History of heart failure was <1 year for 11 patients (61%), and the primary etiology was nonischemic (90%). Of the patients with nonischemic etiologies and <1-year history of heart failure, 13% were explanted. Three patients required LVAD reimplantation; of the remaining 17, 16 remain alive. At follow-up (median 510 days), the mean ejection fraction was 42% (20%-67%) and the mean left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 55 ± 8 mm. At the 2-year follow-up (n = 13), patients were New York Heart Association functional class I or II and overall survival rate was 85 ± 11%.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that LV recovery is most likely to occur in young patients (<40 years) with nonischemic cardiomyopathy of <1 year duration. Two-year postexplant survival was excellent.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22555270     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2012.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  23 in total

1.  Bridge to recovery: understanding the disconnect between clinical and biological outcomes.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman; Bruce B Reid; John V Terrovitis; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Epidemiology of "Heart Failure with Recovered Ejection Fraction": What do we do After Recovery?

Authors:  Johny S Kuttab; Michael S Kiernan; Amanda R Vest
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  LaVone A Smith; Leora T Yarboro; Jamie L W Kennedy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Cardiac Rotational Mechanics As a Predictor of Myocardial Recovery in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Chronic Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michael J Bonios; Antigone Koliopoulou; Omar Wever-Pinzon; Iosif Taleb; Josef Stehlik; Weining Xu; James Wever-Pinzon; Anna Catino; Abdallah G Kfoury; Benjamin D Horne; Jose Nativi-Nicolau; Stamatis N Adamopoulos; James C Fang; Craig H Selzman; Jeroen J Bax; Stavros G Drakos
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 5.  Assessment of ventricular remodeling in heart failure clinical trials.

Authors:  James N Kirkpatrick; Martin St John Sutton
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-12

6.  Myocardial Recovery in Patients Receiving Contemporary Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Results From the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS).

Authors:  Veli K Topkara; A Reshad Garan; Barry Fine; Amandine F Godier-Furnémont; Alexander Breskin; Barbara Cagliostro; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Donna M Mancini; Yoshifumi Naka; Paolo C Colombo
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 8.790

7.  Medical management of patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Adam D Devore; Robert J Mentz; Chetan B Patel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-02

Review 8.  Hold or fold--proteins in advanced heart failure and myocardial recovery.

Authors:  Claudius Mahr; Rebekah L Gundry
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Structural and functional cardiac profile after prolonged duration of mechanical unloading: potential implications for myocardial recovery.

Authors:  Estibaliz Castillero; Ziad A Ali; Hirokazu Akashi; Nicholas Giangreco; Catherine Wang; Eric J Stöhr; Ruping Ji; Xiaokan Zhang; Nathaniel Kheysin; Joo-Eun S Park; Sheetal Hegde; Sanatkumar Patel; Samantha Stein; Carlos Cuenca; Diana Leung; Shunichi Homma; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Veli K Topkara; Koji Takeda; Paolo C Colombo; Yoshifumi Naka; H Lee Sweeney; P Christian Schulze; Isaac George
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 10.  Expanding the Scope of Multimodality Imaging in Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Zaid I Almarzooq; Anubodh S Varshney; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Manan Pareek; Garrick C Stewart; Jerry D Estep; Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.