Literature DB >> 21242487

Reversal of severe heart failure with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device and pharmacological therapy: a prospective study.

Emma J Birks1, Robert S George, Mike Hedger, Toufan Bahrami, Penny Wilton, Christopher T Bowles, Carole Webb, Robert Bougard, Mohammed Amrani, Magdi H Yacoub, Gilles Dreyfus, Asghar Khaghani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that a specific combination of drug therapy and left ventricular assist device unloading results in significant myocardial recovery, sufficient to allow pump removal, in two thirds of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy receiving a Heartmate I pulsatile device. However, this protocol has not been used with nonpulsatile devices. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We report the results of a prospective study of 20 patients who received a combination of angiotensin-converting enzymes, β-blockers, angiotensin II inhibitors, and aldosterone antagonists followed by the β₂-agonist clenbuterol and were regularly tested (echocardiograms, exercise tests, catheterizations) with the pump at low speed. Before left ventricular assist device insertion, patient age was 35.2 ± 12.6 years (16 male patients), patients were on 2.0 ± 0.9 inotropes, 7 (35) had an intra-aortic balloon pump, 2 were hemofiltered, 2 were ventilated, 3 had a prior Levitronix device, and 1 had extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Cardiac index was 1.39 ± 0.43 L · min⁻¹ · m⁻², pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 31.5 ± 5.7 mm Hg, and heart failure history was 3.4 ± 3.5 years. One patient was lost to follow-up and died after 240 days of support. Of the remaining 19 patients, 12 (63.2) were explanted after 286 ± 97 days. Eight had symptomatic heart failure for ≤6 months and 4 for >6 months (48 to 132 months). Before explantation, at low flow for 15 minutes, ejection fraction was 70 ± 7, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 48.6 ± 5.7 mm, left ventricular end-systolic diameter was 32.3 ± 5.7 mm, mV(O₂) was 21.6 ± 4 mL · kg⁻¹ · min⁻¹, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 5.9 ± 4.6 mm Hg, and cardiac index was 3.6 ± 0.6 L · min⁻¹ · m⁻². Estimated survival without heart failure recurrence was 83.3 at 1 and 3 years. After a 430.7 ± 337.1-day follow-up, surviving explants had an ejection fraction of 58.1 ± 13.8, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter of 59.0 ± 9.3 mm, left ventricular end-systolic diameter of 42.0 ± 10.7 mm, and mV(O₂) of 22.6 ± 5.3 mL · kg⁻¹ · min⁻¹.
CONCLUSIONS: Reversal of end-stage heart failure secondary to nonischemic cardiomyopathy can be achieved in a substantial proportion of patients with nonpulsatile flow through the use of a combination of mechanical and pharmacological therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21242487     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.933960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  92 in total

Review 1.  Reverse remodeling in heart failure--mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Norimichi Koitabashi; David A Kass
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Is myocardial recovery possible and how do you measure it?

Authors:  Douglas L Mann; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Bridge to recovery: understanding the disconnect between clinical and biological outcomes.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman; Bruce B Reid; John V Terrovitis; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Minimally invasive is the future of left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  George Makdisi; I-Wen Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Epidemiology of "Heart Failure with Recovered Ejection Fraction": What do we do After Recovery?

Authors:  Johny S Kuttab; Michael S Kiernan; Amanda R Vest
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-12

Review 6.  Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  LaVone A Smith; Leora T Yarboro; Jamie L W Kennedy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Ventricular assist devices: pharmacological aspects of a mechanical therapy.

Authors:  O Wever-Pinzon; J Stehlik; A G Kfoury; J V Terrovitis; N A Diakos; C Charitos; D Y Li; S G Drakos
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 12.310

8.  Assessment of myocardial viability and left ventricular function in patients supported by a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Deepak K Gupta; Hicham Skali; Jose Rivero; Patricia Campbell; Leslie Griffin; Colleen Smith; Courtney Foster; Brian Claggett; Robert J Glynn; Gregory Couper; Michael M Givertz; Mandeep R Mehra; Marcelo Di Carli; Scott D Solomon; Marc A Pfeffer
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 9.  The sympathetic nervous system and heart failure.

Authors:  David Y Zhang; Allen S Anderson
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 10.  Devices in the management of advanced, chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Sakima A Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.