Literature DB >> 25442065

Is American College of Surgeons NSQIP organ space infection a surrogate for pancreatic fistula?

Janak Atul Parikh1, Joal D Beane1, E Molly Kilbane2, Daniel P Milgrom1, Henry A Pitt3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP), pancreatic fistula has not been monitored, although organ space infection (OSI) data are collected. Therefore, the purpose of this analysis was to determine the relationship between ACS NSQIP organ space infection and pancreatic fistulas. STUDY
DESIGN: From 2007 to 2011, 976 pancreatic resection patients were monitored via ACS NSQIP at our institution. From this database, 250 patients were randomly chosen for further analysis. Four patients were excluded because they underwent total pancreatectomy. Data on OSI were gathered prospectively. Data on pancreatic fistulas and other intra-abdominal complications were determined retrospectively.
RESULTS: Organ space infections (OSIs) were documented in 22 patients (8.9%). Grades B (n = 26) and C (n = 5) pancreatic fistulas occurred in 31 patients (12.4%); grade A fistulas were observed in 38 patients (15.2%). Bile leaks and gastrointestinal (GI) anastomotic leaks each developed in 5 (2.0%) patients. Only 17 of 31 grade B and C pancreatic fistulas (55%), and none of 38 grade A fistulas were classified as OSIs in ACS NSQIP. In addition, only 2 of 5 bile leaks (40%) and 2 of 5 GI anastomotic leaks (40%) were OSIs. Moreover, 3 OSIs were due to bacterial peritonitis, a chyle leak, and an ischemic bowel.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that the sensitivity (55%) and specificity (45%) of organ space infection (OSI) in ACS NSQIP are too low for OSI to be a surrogate for grade B and C pancreatic fistulas. We concluded that procedure-specific variables will be required for ACS NSQIP to improve outcomes after pancreatectomy.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25442065      PMCID: PMC4386682          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  28 in total

1.  Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study.

Authors:  J Daley; S F Khuri; W Henderson; K Hur; J O Gibbs; G Barbour; J Demakis; G Irvin; J F Stremple; F Grover; G McDonald; E Passaro; P J Fabri; J Spencer; K Hammermeister; J B Aust; C Oprian
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.

Authors:  Bruce L Hall; Barton H Hamilton; Karen Richards; Karl Y Bilimoria; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreas-specific module.

Authors:  Irene Epelboym; Irmina Gawlas; James A Lee; Beth Schrope; John A Chabot; John D Allendorf
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Carotid-subclavian bypass and subclavian-carotid transposition in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair era.

Authors:  Arin L Madenci; C Keith Ozaki; Michael Belkin; James T McPhee
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Wound complications after inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma: is ACS NSQIP adequate?

Authors:  Carly E Glarner; David Y Greenblatt; Robert J Rettammel; Heather B Neuman; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Management and outcomes of postpancreatectomy fistula, leak, and abscess: results of 908 patients resected at a single institution between 2000 and 2005.

Authors:  Yael Vin; Camelia S Sima; George I Getrajdman; Karen T Brown; Anne Covey; Murray F Brennan; Peter J Allen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Olga Jonasson; R Scott Jones; Darrell A Campbell; Aaron S Fink; Robert M Mentzer; Leigh Neumayer; Karl Hammermeister; Cecilia Mosca; Nancy Healey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Olga Jonasson; R Scott Jones; Darrell A Campbell; Aaron S Fink; Robert M Mentzer; Janet E Steeger
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  12 in total

1.  Does Pancreatic Stump Closure Method Influence Distal Pancreatectomy Outcomes?

Authors:  Eugene P Ceppa; Robert M McCurdy; David C Becerra; E Molly Kilbane; Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Keith D Lillemoe; Henry A Pitt; Michael G House
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Indication for en bloc pancreatectomy with colectomy: when is it safe?

Authors:  Patrick B Schwartz; Alexandra M Roch; Jane S Han; Alex V Vaicius; William P Lancaster; E Molly Kilbane; Michael G House; Nicholas J Zyromski; C Max Schmidt; Atilla Nakeeb; Eugene P Ceppa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Summary perioperative risk metrics within the electronic medical record predict patient-level cost variation in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Christopher C Stahl; Patrick B Schwartz; Glen E Leverson; James R Barrett; Taylor Aiken; Alexandra W Acher; Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Rebecca M Minter; Sharon M Weber; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Geriatric nutritional risk index predicts surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Naotake Funamizu; Yukio Nakabayashi; Tomonori Iida; Kazunao Kurihara
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-07-16

5.  Whipple-specific complications result in prolonged length of stay not accounted for in ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator.

Authors:  Brian M Cusworth; Bradley A Krasnick; Timothy M Nywening; Cheryl A Woolsey; Ryan C Fields; Maria M Doyle; Jingxia Liu; William G Hawkins
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and premalignant pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  Timothy E Newhook; Damien J LaPar; James M Lindberg; Todd W Bauer; Reid B Adams; Victor M Zaydfudim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: does timing matter?

Authors:  Gyulnara G Kasumova; Mariam F Eskander; Tara S Kent; Sing Chau Ng; A James Moser; Muneeb Ahmed; Douglas K Pleskow; Mark P Callery; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Increased morbidity and mortality of a concomitant colectomy during a pancreaticoduodenectomy: an NSQIP propensity-score matched analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer W Harris; Jeremiah T Martin; Erin C Maynard; Patrick C McGrath; Ching-Wei D Tzeng
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Geriatric nutritional risk index serves as risk factor of surgical site infection after pancreatoduodenectomy: a validation cohort Ageo study.

Authors:  Naotake Funamizu; Kenji Omura; Takahiro Ozaki; Masayuki Honda; Kohei Mishima; Kazuharu Igarashi; Yasutsugu Takada; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-12

10.  Preoperative hematocrit on early prosthetic joint infection and deep venous thrombosis rates in primary total hip arthroplasty: A database study.

Authors:  Bradley W Wills; Jeffrey Pearson; Alan Hsu; Peng Li; Ashish Shah; Sameer Naranje
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.