Literature DB >> 27939807

Whipple-specific complications result in prolonged length of stay not accounted for in ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator.

Brian M Cusworth1, Bradley A Krasnick1, Timothy M Nywening1, Cheryl A Woolsey1, Ryan C Fields2, Maria M Doyle1, Jingxia Liu1, William G Hawkins3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Surgical Risk Calculator was developed to help counsel patients regarding estimated postoperative risk for a variety of surgical complications. This retrospective single institutional study examined the calculator's ability to accurately predict complications and length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients who had undergone a Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at our institution.
METHODS: 165 patients at Washington University School of Medicine who underwent a PD from 8/2011 to 7/2013 were included. Surgical complication risk as determined by the ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator were compared to actual 30 day complications. PD complications not accounted for by the calculator were compared to those without PD-specific complications.
RESULTS: Overall predicted LOS was significantly shorter than actual duration of hospitalization (median 8.5 vs. 8.0 days; p < 0.001). 38% patients (n = 62) with Whipple-specific complication demonstrated a significant increase in LOS (8.0 vs. 12.2 days; p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: A large proportion of complications experienced after PD are pancreas-specific, accounting for the difference in predicted vs. actual LOS and providing rationale for future development of PD specific risk models.
Copyright © 2016 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27939807      PMCID: PMC5462337          DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  37 in total

1.  Navigating high risk procedures with more than just a street map.

Authors:  Margaret L Schwarze; Jacqueline M Kehler; Toby C Campbell
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreas-specific module.

Authors:  Irene Epelboym; Irmina Gawlas; James A Lee; Beth Schrope; John A Chabot; John D Allendorf
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  What we talk about when we talk about risk: refining surgery's hazards in medical thought.

Authors:  Mark D Neuman; Charles L Bosk
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Who pays for poor surgical quality? Building a business case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; William B Weeks; Raj J Karia; Smita Das; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Pancreatoduodenectomy: a retrospective review 1949 to 1969.

Authors:  P B Lansing; J B Blalock; J L Ochsner
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Is American College of Surgeons NSQIP organ space infection a surrogate for pancreatic fistula?

Authors:  Janak Atul Parikh; Joal D Beane; E Molly Kilbane; Daniel P Milgrom; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  David Yu Greenblatt; Kaitlyn J Kelly; Victoria Rajamanickam; Yin Wan; Todd Hanson; Robert Rettammel; Emily R Winslow; Clifford S Cho; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  An analysis of the reduced morbidity and mortality rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  C A Pellegrini; C F Heck; S Raper; L W Way
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1989-07

10.  Does resident experience affect outcomes in complex abdominal surgery? Pancreaticoduodenectomy as an example.

Authors:  Daniel M Relles; Richard A Burkhart; Michael J Pucci; Jocelyn Sendecki; Renee Tholey; Ross Drueding; Patricia K Sauter; Eugene P Kennedy; Jordan M Winter; Harish Lavu; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  11 in total

1.  Independent Predictors of Increased Operative Time and Hospital Length of Stay Are Consistent Across Different Surgical Approaches to Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Dimitrios Xourafas; Timothy M Pawlik; Jordan M Cloyd
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Predicting Post-operative Complications in Crohn's Disease: an Appraisal of Clinical Scoring Systems and the NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator.

Authors:  Kevin R McMahon; Kenneth D Allen; Anita Afzali; Syed Husain
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Evaluating the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement project risk calculator: results from the U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium.

Authors:  Eliza W Beal; Ezra Lyon; Joe Kearney; Lai Wei; Cecilia G Ethun; Sylvester M Black; Mary Dillhoff; Ahmed Salem; Sharon M Weber; Thuy B Tran; George Poultsides; Rivfka Shenoy; Ioannis Hatzaras; Bradley Krasnick; Ryan C Fields; Stefan Buttner; Charles R Scoggins; Robert C G Martin; Chelsea A Isom; Kamron Idrees; Harveshp D Mogal; Perry Shen; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik; Carl R Schmidt
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Enhancing Patient Outcomes while Containing Costs after Complex Abdominal Operation: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Whipple Accelerated Recovery Pathway.

Authors:  Harish Lavu; Neal S McCall; Jordan M Winter; Richard A Burkhart; Michael Pucci; Benjamin E Leiby; Theresa P Yeo; Shawnna Cannaday; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Length of Stay After Joint Arthroplasty is Less Than Predicted Using Two Risk Calculators.

Authors:  Colin J Carr; Simon C Mears; C Lowry Barnes; Jeffrey B Stambough
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.435

6.  Assessing the Performance of the De Novo Postoperative Stress Urinary Incontinence Calculator.

Authors:  James H Ross; Charelle M Carter-Brooks; Kristine M Ruppert; Lauren E Giugale; Jonathan P Shepherd; Halina M Zyczynski
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 1.913

Review 7.  A rare variation of celiac trunk and hepatic artery complicating pancreaticoduodenectomy: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Zhou Ye; Song Ye; Dongkai Zhou; Shusen Zheng; Weilin Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Beyond 30 Days: A Risk Calculator for Longer Term Outcomes of Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jordan T Blough; Michael M Vu; Cecil S Qiu; Alexei S Mlodinow; Nima Khavanin; Neil A Fine; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-12-12

9.  Standardization of perioperative care facilitates safe discharge by postoperative day five after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Sara K Daniel; Lucas W Thornblade; Gary N Mann; James O Park; Venu G Pillarisetty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A simplified scoring system for the prediction of pancreatoduodenectomy's complications: An observational study.

Authors:  Long Chen; Dai-Wen Su; Fan Zhang; Jun-Yi Shen; Yan-Hong Zhang; Yun-Bing Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.