Literature DB >> 17122618

Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Michelle L DeOliveira1, Jordan M Winter, Markus Schafer, Steven C Cunningham, John L Cameron, Charles J Yeo, Pierre-Alain Clavien.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define a simple and reproducible classification of complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) based on a therapy-oriented severity grading system.
BACKGROUND: While mortality is rare after PD, morbidity rates remain high. The lack of standardization in evaluating morbidity after PD has severely hampered meaningful comparisons over time and among centers. We adapted a novel classification of complication to stratify morbidity by severity after PD, to test whether the incidence of pancreatic fistula has changed over time, and to identify risk factors in a single North American center.
METHODS: The classification was applied to a consecutive series of 633 patients undergoing PD between February 2003 and August 2005. Another series of 141 patients treated between 1987 and 1990 was also analyzed to identify changes in the incidence and severity of fistula. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to link respective complications with preoperative and intraoperative parameters, length of hospital stay, and long-term survival.
RESULTS: A total of 263 (41.5%) patients did not develop any complication, while 370 (58.5%) had at least one complication; 62 (10.0%) patients had only grade I complications (no need for specific intervention), 192 patients (30.0%) had grade II (need for drug therapy such as antibiotics), 85 patients (13.5%) had grade III (need for invasive therapy), and 19 patients (3.0%) had grade IV complications (organ dysfunction with ICU stay). Grade V (death) occurred in 12 patients (2.0%). A total of 57 patients (9.0%) developed pancreatic fistula, of which 33 (58.0%) were classified as grade II, 17 (30.0%) as grade III, 5 (9.0%) as grade IV, and 2 (3.5%) as grade V. Delayed gastric emptying was documented in 80 patients (12.7%); half of them were scored as grade II and the other half as grade III. A significant decrease in the incidence of fistula was observed between the 2 periods analyzed (14.0% vs. 9.0%, P < 0.001), mostly due to a decrease in grade II fistula. Cardiovascular disease was a risk factor for overall morbidity and complication severity, while texture of the gland and cardiovascular disease were risk factors for pancreatic fistula.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the applicability and utility of a new classification in grading complications following pancreatic surgery. This novel approach may provide a standardized, objective, and reproducible assessment of pancreas surgery enabling meaningful comparison among centers and over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17122618      PMCID: PMC1856636          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000246856.03918.9a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  36 in total

1.  Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high volume centre: results on 150 consecutive patients.

Authors:  C Bassi; M Falconi; R Salvia; G Mascetta; E Molinari; P Pederzoli
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A report of the Vancouver Forum on the care of the live organ donor: lung, liver, pancreas, and intestine data and medical guidelines.

Authors:  Mark L Barr; Jacques Belghiti; Federico G Villamil; Elizabeth A Pomfret; David S Sutherland; Rainer W Gruessner; Alan N Langnas; Francis L Delmonico
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators.

Authors:  T A Sohn; C J Yeo; J L Cameron; L Koniaris; S Kaushal; R A Abrams; P K Sauter; J Coleman; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature.

Authors:  Robert C G Martin; Murray F Brennan; David P Jaques
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

7.  Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume.

Authors:  D J Gouma; R C van Geenen; T M van Gulik; R J de Haan; L T de Wit; O R Busch; H Obertop
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Complications of laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  E M Targarona; J J Espert; E Bombuy; O Vidal; G Cerdán; V Artigas; M Trías
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-10

Review 9.  Evidence-based pancreatic head resection for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Markus Schäfer; Beat Müllhaupt; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Donor and recipient outcomes in right lobe adult living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Rafik M Ghobrial; Sammy Saab; Charles Lassman; David S k Lu; Steven Raman; Piyagorn Limanond; Greg Kunder; Karyn Marks; Farin Amersi; Dean Anselmo; Pauline Chen; Douglas Farmer; Steven Han; Francisco Durazo; Leonard I Goldstein; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.799

View more
  281 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic surgery: evolution and current tailored approach.

Authors:  Mario Zovak; Dubravka Mužina Mišić; Goran Glavčić
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Reliability of a complication classification system for orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Ernest L Sink; Michael Leunig; Ira Zaltz; Jennifer Claire Gilbert; John Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Variable impact of complications in general surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Eelke Bosma; Eelco J Veen; Mariska A C de Jongh; Jan A Roukema
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Pancreas-sparing total duodenectomy for ampullary duodenal neoplasms.

Authors:  John A Stauffer; Cameron D Adkisson; Douglas L Riegert-Johnson; Ross F Goldberg; Steven P Bowers; Horacio J Asbun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Pancreatoduodenectomy with or without early ligation of the inferior pancreatoduodenal artery: comparison of intraoperative blood loss and short-term outcome.

Authors:  Yoichi Ishizaki; Hiroyuki Sugo; Jiro Yoshimoto; Hiroshi Imamura; Seiji Kawasaki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Modified Blumgart Suturing Technique for Remnant Closure After Distal Pancreatectomy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Suguru Yamada; Kenta Murotani; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masashi Hattori; Mitsuro Kanda; Hideki Takami; Goro Nakayama; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Akimasa Nakao; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Lessons learned from 300 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies over a 25-year experience: the "safety net" improves the outcomes beyond surgeon skills.

Authors:  Roberto Santoro; Roberto Luca Meniconi; Pasquale Lepiane; Giovanni Vennarecci; Gianluca Mascianà; Marco Colasanti; Eugenio Santoro; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  The impact of postoperative complications on the administration of adjuvant therapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wenchuan Wu; Jin He; John L Cameron; Martin Makary; Kevin Soares; Nita Ahuja; Neda Rezaee; Joseph Herman; Lei Zheng; Daniel Laheru; Michael A Choti; Ralph H Hruban; Timothy M Pawlik; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Effect of preoperative renal insufficiency on postoperative outcomes after pancreatic resection: a single institution experience of 1,061 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Malcolm H Squires; Vishes V Mehta; Sarah B Fisher; Neha L Lad; David A Kooby; Juan M Sarmiento; Kenneth Cardona; Maria C Russell; Charles A Staley; Shishir K Maithel
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: does timing matter?

Authors:  Gyulnara G Kasumova; Mariam F Eskander; Tara S Kent; Sing Chau Ng; A James Moser; Muneeb Ahmed; Douglas K Pleskow; Mark P Callery; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.