Literature DB >> 32349869

Summary perioperative risk metrics within the electronic medical record predict patient-level cost variation in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Christopher C Stahl1, Patrick B Schwartz1, Glen E Leverson1, James R Barrett1, Taylor Aiken1, Alexandra W Acher1, Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly1, Rebecca M Minter1, Sharon M Weber1, Daniel E Abbott2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Automated data extraction from the electronic medical record is fast, scalable, and inexpensive compared with manual abstraction. However, concerns regarding data quality and control for underlying patient variation when performing retrospective analyses exist. This study assesses the ability of summary electronic medical record metrics to control for patient-level variation in cost outcomes in pancreaticoduodenectomy.
METHODS: Patients that underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2014 to 2018 at a single institution were identified within the electronic medical record and linked with the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Variables in both data sets were compared using interrater reliability. Logistic and linear regression modelling of complications and costs were performed using combinations of comorbidities/summary metrics. Models were compared using the adjusted R2 and Akaike information criterion.
RESULTS: A total of 117 patients populated the final data set. A total of 31 (26.5%) patients experienced a complication identified by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The median direct variable cost for the encounter was US$14,314. Agreement between variables present in the electronic medical record and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was excellent. Stepwise linear regression models of costs, using only electronic medical record-extractable variables, were non-inferior to those created with manually abstracted individual comorbidities (R2 = 0.67 vs 0.30, Akaike information criterion 2,095 vs 2,216). Model performance statistics were minimally impacted by the addition of comorbidities to models containing electronic medical record summary metrics (R2 = 0.67 vs 0.70, Akaike information criterion 2,095 vs 2,088).
CONCLUSION: Summary electronic medical record perioperative risk metrics predict patient-level cost variation as effectively as individual comorbidities in the pancreaticoduodenectomy population. Automated electronic medical record data extraction can expand the patient population available for retrospective analysis without the associated increase in human and fiscal resources that manual data abstraction requires.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32349869      PMCID: PMC7769681          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  30 in total

1.  Ranking hospitals on surgical quality: does risk-adjustment always matter?

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Use of administrative medical databases in population-based research.

Authors:  Natalie Gavrielov-Yusim; Michael Friger
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  The ICD-9-based illness severity score: a new model that outperforms both DRG and APR-DRG as predictors of survival and resource utilization.

Authors:  R Rutledge; T Osler
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1998-10

4.  Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreas-specific module.

Authors:  Irene Epelboym; Irmina Gawlas; James A Lee; Beth Schrope; John A Chabot; John D Allendorf
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The promise of comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Paul Sullivan; Don Goldmann
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Can't you just pull the data? The limitations of using of the electronic medical record for research.

Authors:  Morgan L Brown
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.556

7.  US Physician Practices Spend More Than $15.4 Billion Annually To Report Quality Measures.

Authors:  Lawrence P Casalino; David Gans; Rachel Weber; Meagan Cea; Amber Tuchovsky; Tara F Bishop; Yesenia Miranda; Brittany A Frankel; Kristina B Ziehler; Meghan M Wong; Todd B Evenson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Yaoming Liu; Jennifer L Paruch; Lynn Zhou; Thomas E Kmiecik; Clifford Y Ko; Mark E Cohen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  All-Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups in primary arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carlos J Lavernia; Artit Laoruengthana; Juan S Contreras; Mark D Rossi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Outcomes following pancreatic resection: variability among high-volume providers.

Authors:  Taylor S Riall; William H Nealon; James S Goodwin; Courtney M Townsend; Jean L Freeman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.