Literature DB >> 10235528

Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

K D Lillemoe1, S Kaushal, J L Cameron, T A Sohn, H A Pitt, C J Yeo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Distal pancreatectomy is performed for a variety of benign and malignant conditions. In recent years, significant improvements in perioperative results have been observed at high-volume centers after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Little data, however, are available concerning the current indications and outcomes after distal pancreatectomy. This single-institution experience reviews the recent indications, complications, and outcomes after distal pancreatectomy.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of the hospital records of all patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy between January 1994 and December 1997, inclusive.
RESULTS: The patient population (n = 235) had a mean age of 51 years, (range 1 month to 82 years); 43% were male and 84% white. The final diagnoses included chronic pancreatitis (24%), benign pancreatic cystadenoma (22%), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (18%), neuroendocrine tumor (14%), pancreatic pseudocyst (6%), cystadenocarcinoma (3%), and miscellaneous (13%). The level of resection was at or to the left of the superior mesenteric vein in 96% of patients. A splenectomy was performed in 84% and a cholecystectomy in 15% of patients. The median intraoperative blood loss was 450 ml, the median number of red blood cell units transfused was zero, and the median operative time was 4.3 hours. Two deaths occurred in the hospital or within 30 days of surgery for a perioperative mortality rate of 0.9%. The overall postoperative complication rate was 31%; the most common complications were new-onset insulin-dependent diabetes (8%), pancreatic fistula (5%), intraabdominal abscess (4%), small bowel obstruction (4%), and postoperative hemorrhage (4%). Fourteen patients (6%) required a second surgical procedure; the most common indication was postoperative bleeding. The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 10 days. Patients who underwent a distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (n = 198) had a similar complication rate (30% vs. 29%), operative time (4.6 vs. 5.1 hours), and intraoperative blood loss (500 vs. 350 ml) and a shorter postoperative length of stay (13 vs. 21 days) than the patients who had splenic preservation (n = 37).
CONCLUSIONS: This series represents the largest single-institution experience with distal pancreatectomy. These data demonstrate that elective distal pancreatectomy is associated with a mortality rate of <1%. These results demonstrate that, as with pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy can be performed with minimal perioperative mortality and acceptable morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10235528      PMCID: PMC1420814          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199905000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  23 in total

1.  The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure.

Authors:  T A Gordon; G P Burleyson; J M Tielsch; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality.

Authors:  M Trede; G Schwall; H D Saeger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  A L Warshaw
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-05

4.  Pyloric and gastric preserving pancreatic resection. Experience with 87 patients.

Authors:  J W Braasch; D J Deziel; R L Rossi; E Watkins; P F Winter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas.

Authors:  I H Nordback; R H Hruban; J K Boitnott; H A Pitt; J L Cameron
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Decreased morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  P A Grace; H A Pitt; R K Tompkins; L DenBesten; W P Longmire
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Distal pancreatectomy with and without splenectomy.

Authors:  M C Aldridge; R C Williamson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Description and rationale of a new operation for chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  C F Frey; G J Smith
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Cystadenomas of the pancreas: is enucleation an adequate operation?

Authors:  M A Talamini; R Moesinger; C J Yeo; B Poulose; R H Hruban; J L Cameron; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy.

Authors:  M D Lieberman; H Kilburn; M Lindsey; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  175 in total

Review 1.  Minimal-access approaches to complications of acute pancreatitis and benign neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  T A Kellogg; K D Horvath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: how I do it.

Authors:  Piero Marco Fisichella; Vidya Shankaran; Margo Shoup
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Modified Blumgart Suturing Technique for Remnant Closure After Distal Pancreatectomy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Suguru Yamada; Kenta Murotani; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masashi Hattori; Mitsuro Kanda; Hideki Takami; Goro Nakayama; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Akimasa Nakao; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: a frequent finding.

Authors:  Christin Tjaden; Ulf Hinz; Matthias Hassenpflug; Franziska Fritz; Stefan Fritz; Lars Grenacher; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Gerard J Abood; M Fatih Can; Mustapha Daouadi; Harold T Huss; Jennifer Y Steve; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Michael Stang; David L Bartlett; Herbert J Zeh; A James Moser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Cystic pancreatic neoplasms: enucleate or resect?

Authors:  James M Kiely; Attila Nakeeb; Richard A Komorowski; Stuart D Wilson; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Risk factors associated with pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, which technique of pancreatic stump closure is more beneficial?

Authors:  Marco Pericoli Ridolfini; Sergio Alfieri; Stavros Gourgiotis; Dario Di Miceli; Fabio Rotondi; Giuseppe Quero; Roberta Manghi; Giovanni Battista Doglietto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Defining quality for distal pancreatectomy: does the laparoscopic approach protect patients from poor quality outcomes?

Authors:  Marshall S Baker; Karen L Sherman; Susan Stocker; Amanda V Hayman; David J Bentrem; Richard A Prinz; Mark S Talamonti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Therapeutic laparoscopy of the pancreas.

Authors:  Adrian E Park; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Safe closure technique for distal pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Gyula Farkas; László Leindler; Gyula Farkas
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-08-28       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.