INTRODUCTION: Aggressive en bloc resection of adjacent organs is often necessary to resect pancreatic or colonic lesions. However, it is debated whether simultaneous pancreatectomy with colectomy (P+C) is warranted as it potentially increases morbidity and mortality (MM). We hypothesized that MM would be increased in P+C, especially in cases of pancreatitis. METHODS: All patients who underwent pancreatectomy (P) and simultaneous pancreatectomy with colectomy (P+C) at a high-volume center from November 2006 to 2015 were prospectively collected using ACS-NSQIP at our institution. Patients with additional multivisceral or enucleation procedures were excluded. Data were augmented to 90-day outcomes using our institutional database. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with a mean age of 62 years (27:16 male: female) underwent P+C, accounting for 2.39% (43/1797) of pancreatectomies performed. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) was performed in 61% (n = 26), distal pancreatectomy (DP) in 37% (n = 16), and total pancreatectomy (TP) in 2% (n = 1) of patients. The 30- and 90-day MM were higher in P+C than P (30-day: 54 vs. 37%, p = 0.037 and 9 vs. 2%, p = 0.022; 90-day: 61 vs. 42%, p = 0.019 and 14 vs. 3%, p = 0.002). Logistical regression modeling revealed an association between 90-day mortality and colectomy (p = 0.013, OR = 3.556). When P+C MM were analyzed according to intraoperative factors, there was no significant difference according to type of pancreatectomy (PD vs. DP vs. TP), origin of primary lesion (pancreas vs. colon), surgical indication (malignant vs. non-malignant), or case status (planned colectomy vs. intraoperative decision). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of colectomy to pancreatectomy substantially increased MM. Subanalysis revealed that type of resection performed, etiology, and planning status did not account for increased risk when performing P+C. However, colectomy was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality. Therefore, patients should be informed of the risk of increased postoperative complications until a further study can identify potential patients or perioperative factors that can be used for risk stratification.
INTRODUCTION: Aggressive en bloc resection of adjacent organs is often necessary to resect pancreatic or colonic lesions. However, it is debated whether simultaneous pancreatectomy with colectomy (P+C) is warranted as it potentially increases morbidity and mortality (MM). We hypothesized that MM would be increased in P+C, especially in cases of pancreatitis. METHODS: All patients who underwent pancreatectomy (P) and simultaneous pancreatectomy with colectomy (P+C) at a high-volume center from November 2006 to 2015 were prospectively collected using ACS-NSQIP at our institution. Patients with additional multivisceral or enucleation procedures were excluded. Data were augmented to 90-day outcomes using our institutional database. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with a mean age of 62 years (27:16 male: female) underwent P+C, accounting for 2.39% (43/1797) of pancreatectomies performed. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) was performed in 61% (n = 26), distal pancreatectomy (DP) in 37% (n = 16), and total pancreatectomy (TP) in 2% (n = 1) of patients. The 30- and 90-day MM were higher in P+C than P (30-day: 54 vs. 37%, p = 0.037 and 9 vs. 2%, p = 0.022; 90-day: 61 vs. 42%, p = 0.019 and 14 vs. 3%, p = 0.002). Logistical regression modeling revealed an association between 90-day mortality and colectomy (p = 0.013, OR = 3.556). When P+C MM were analyzed according to intraoperative factors, there was no significant difference according to type of pancreatectomy (PD vs. DP vs. TP), origin of primary lesion (pancreas vs. colon), surgical indication (malignant vs. non-malignant), or case status (planned colectomy vs. intraoperative decision). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of colectomy to pancreatectomy substantially increased MM. Subanalysis revealed that type of resection performed, etiology, and planning status did not account for increased risk when performing P+C. However, colectomy was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality. Therefore, patients should be informed of the risk of increased postoperative complications until a further study can identify potential patients or perioperative factors that can be used for risk stratification.
Authors: Nina P Tamirisa; Abhishek D Parmar; Gabriela M Vargas; Hemalkumar B Mehta; E Molly Kilbane; Bruce L Hall; Henry A Pitt; Taylor S Riall Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: T A Sohn; C J Yeo; J L Cameron; L Koniaris; S Kaushal; R A Abrams; P K Sauter; J Coleman; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2000 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Neil H Bhayani; Laura M Enomoto; Ben C James; Gail Ortenzi; Jussuf T Kaifi; Eric T Kimchi; Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll; Niraj J Gusani Journal: Surgery Date: 2013-12-25 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Chad G Ball; Henry A Pitt; Molly E Kilbane; Elijah Dixon; Francis R Sutherland; Keith D Lillemoe Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Janak Atul Parikh; Joal D Beane; E Molly Kilbane; Daniel P Milgrom; Henry A Pitt Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Joal D Beane; Michael G House; Susan C Pitt; E Molly Kilbane; Bruce L Hall; Abishek D Parmar; Taylor S Riall; Henry A Pitt Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Amanda B Cooper; Abhishek D Parmar; Taylor S Riall; Bruce L Hall; Matthew H G Katz; Thomas A Aloia; Henry A Pitt Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jennifer W Harris; Jeremiah T Martin; Erin C Maynard; Patrick C McGrath; Ching-Wei D Tzeng Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Alexandra W Acher; James R Barrett; Patrick B Schwartz; Chris Stahl; Taylor Aiken; Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Rebecca M Minter; Glen Leverson; Sharon Weber; Daniel E Abbott Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 3.452