Literature DB >> 25425903

Self-report outcome measures for adult hearing aid services: some uses, users, and options.

S Gatehouse1.   

Abstract

Year:  2001        PMID： 25425903      PMCID： PMC4168939          DOI： 10.1177/108471380100500302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN： 1084-7138


× No keyword cloud information.
  39 in total

1.  The role of outcomes data in health-care resource allocation.

Authors:  L B Beck
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  What is treatment evaluation research? What is its relationship to the goals of audiological rehabilitation? Who are the stakeholders of this type of research?

Authors:  J P Gagné
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure.

Authors:  R A Bentler; S E Kramer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  A self-report outcome measure for the evaluation of hearing aid fittings and services.

Authors:  S Gatehouse
Journal:  Health Bull (Edinb)       Date:  1999-11

5.  Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids.

Authors:  H Dillon; A James; J Ginis
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly.

Authors:  B E Weinstein; J B Spitzer; I M Ventry
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The effect of pre-fitting counselling on the outcome of hearing aid fittings.

Authors:  M Norman; C R George; D McCarthy
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1994

8.  Pre-issue assessment and counselling as a component of hearing-aid provision.

Authors:  D N Brooks; D I Johnson
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1981-02

Review 9.  Current issues in rehabilitation outcome measurement: implications for audiological rehabilitation.

Authors:  D Wilkerson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Effects of frequency response characteristics on speech discrimination and perceived intelligibility and pleasantness of speech for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 1.840
View more
  7 in total

1.  Stuart Gatehouse: the international perspective.

Authors:  Dianne J Van Tasell; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

2.  Examination of the validity of auditory traits and tests.

Authors:  G A Flamme
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-09

3.  Personal style and hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  Robert M Traynor; Alice E Holmes
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-03

4.  Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures.

Authors:  James R Dornhoffer; Ted A Meyer; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Assessment of Objective Audiometry to Predict Subjective Satisfaction in Patients With Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Min Young Kwak; Woo Ri Choi; Jun Woo Park; Eun Jeong Hwang; Yeo Ra Ha; Jong Woo Chung; Woo Seok Kang
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.372

6.  Self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users: Longitudinal trends and relationships between subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction.

Authors:  Martin D Vestergaard
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Evaluation of Auditory Functioning and Rehabilitation Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Simon Lansbergen; Inge De Ronde-Brons; Monique Boymans; Wim Soede; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.