Literature DB >> 12811876

A self-report outcome measure for the evaluation of hearing aid fittings and services.

S Gatehouse1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To design, optimise and validate an outcome measure for the evaluation of adult hearing aid fittings.
DESIGN: A multi-dimensional subject-specific and situation-specific questionnaire (the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile--GHABP) to assess initial disability, handicap, use, benefit, residual disability and satisfaction before and after hearing aid provision.
SUBJECTS: Hearing-impaired adults attending National Health Service clinics for the first time for whom amplification is an appropriate management option.
RESULTS: A self-report instrument of length compatible with the requirements of routine clinical practice which retains psychometric leverage. The GHABP demonstrates sensitivity to the technological content and rehabilitative context of interventions. The scale properties facilitate the use of the GHABP in decision-making for individual hearing-impaired patients.
CONCLUSION: An outcome measure such as the GHABP offers the various interested parties (purchasers, providers and patients) a tool for use in the evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of existing services and future developments. Many of the design concepts embodied in the GHABP are applicable in other healthcare contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12811876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Bull (Edinb)        ISSN: 0374-8014


  12 in total

Review 1.  Comparative studies on hearing aid selection and fitting procedures: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Mick Metselaar; Bert Maat; Hans Verschuure; Wouter A Dreschler; Louw Feenstra
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Stuart Gatehouse: the international perspective.

Authors:  Dianne J Van Tasell; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

3.  Self-report outcome measures for adult hearing aid services: some uses, users, and options.

Authors:  S Gatehouse
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-09

4.  [Development and use of an APHAB database].

Authors:  J Löhler; B Akcicek; T Kappe; P Schlattmann; B Wollenberg; R Schönweiler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Stuart Gatehouse: a brief life.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

6.  Using patient perceptions of relative benefit and enjoyment to assess auditory training.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell S Sommers; Elizabeth Mauzé; Catherine Schroy; Joe Barcroft; Brent Spehar
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 7.  Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.

Authors:  Fiona Barker; Emma Mackenzie; Lynette Elliott; Simon Jones; Simon de Lusignan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-18

8.  Comparison of the benefits of cochlear implantation versus contra-lateral routing of signal hearing aids in adult patients with single-sided deafness: study protocol for a prospective within-subject longitudinal trial.

Authors:  Pádraig T Kitterick; Gerard M O'Donoghue; Mark Edmondson-Jones; Andrew Marshall; Ellen Jeffs; Louise Craddock; Alison Riley; Kevin Green; Martin O'Driscoll; Dan Jiang; Terry Nunn; Shakeel Saeed; Wanda Aleksy; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2014-08-11

9.  Sensitivity to temporal fine structure and hearing-aid outcomes in older adults.

Authors:  Elvira Perez; Abby McCormack; Barrie A Edmonds
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Evaluation of hearing aid benefit through a new questionnaire: CISQ (Complete Intelligibility Spatiality Quality).

Authors:  P Giordano; P Argentero; A Canale; M Lacilla; R Albera
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.