Literature DB >> 10981593

Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure.

R A Bentler1, S E Kramer.   

Abstract

A table of available self-report inventories used throughout the world is provided with references for obtaining necessary psychometric data for research or clinical applications. Considerations for choosing an inventory (reliability, validity, and content appropriateness) are discussed and issues related to group versus single-subject applications examined. It is preferable that translation and revalidation of existing outcome measures be considered above developing new ones for international application.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10981593     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200008001-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  10 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laura Turton; Pamela Souza; Linda Thibodeau; Louise Hickson; René Gifford; Judith Bird; Maren Stropahl; Lorraine Gailey; Bernadette Fulton; Nerina Scarinci; Katie Ekberg; Barbra Timmer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

2.  Examination of the validity of auditory traits and tests.

Authors:  G A Flamme
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-09

3.  Self-report outcome measures for adult hearing aid services: some uses, users, and options.

Authors:  S Gatehouse
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-09

4.  Short-term hearing aid benefit in a large group.

Authors:  Peter J Ivory; Bryan L Hendricks; Dennis Van Vliet; Cynthia M Beyer; Harvey B Abrams
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-12

Review 5.  Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Line Vestergaard Knudsen; Marie Oberg; Claus Nielsen; Graham Naylor; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09

Review 6.  APSO Standards: Implementing Hearing Aid Needs Assessments and Measuring Related Outcomes.

Authors:  Michelle L Arnold; Victoria A Sanchez
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2022-07-26

Review 7.  A systematic review of studies measuring and reporting hearing aid usage in older adults since 1999: a descriptive summary of measurement tools.

Authors:  Elvira Perez; Barrie A Edmonds
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Effectiveness of a Vocational Enablement Protocol for Employees With Hearing Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Arjenne H M Gussenhoven; Johannes R Anema; Birgit I Witte; S Theo Goverts; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Operationalization of the Brief ICF Core Set for Hearing Loss: An ICF-Based e-Intake Tool in Clinical Otology and Audiology Practice.

Authors:  Lisette M van Leeuwen; Marieke Pronk; Paul Merkus; S Theo Goverts; Caroline B Terwee; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Auditory satisfaction of patients fitted with hearing aids in the Brazilian Public Health Service and benefits offered by the hearing aids.

Authors:  Deide Paula Costa Braga da Silva; Virgínia Braz da Silva; Fernanda Soares Aurélio
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.