Literature DB >> 9046067

Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids.

H Dillon1, A James, J Ginis.   

Abstract

Several methods for measuring the self-reported benefit and satisfaction provided by a hearing aid were compared by administering all methods to each of 98 subjects. Significant correlations between many of the measures and reasonably high test-retest correlations for two of the measures administered twice suggest that most of the measures provide valid estimates of benefit and/or satisfaction. One of the methods included is a new tool called the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI). In this method, the client effectively writes the self-report questionnaire by nominating up to five listening situations in which help with hearing is required. At the conclusion of rehabilitation, reduction in disability and the resulting ability to communicate in these specific situations is quantified. Based on correlation analysis, the COSI method is as statistically valid as the much longer, more traditional questionnaires. Other features, such as relevance, diagnostic utility, compatibility with normal interviewing techniques, and good test-retest reliability, make it particularly suitable for routine clinical use.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9046067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  57 in total

1.  Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Louise Hickson; Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

2.  Modeling and predicting hearing aid outcome.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laura Turton; Pamela Souza; Linda Thibodeau; Louise Hickson; René Gifford; Judith Bird; Maren Stropahl; Lorraine Gailey; Bernadette Fulton; Nerina Scarinci; Katie Ekberg; Barbra Timmer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

4.  Evidence for the use of hearing assistive technology by adults: the role of the FM system.

Authors:  Theresa Hnath Chisolm; Colleen M Noe; Rachel McArdle; Harvey Abrams
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-06

5.  Effects of Context Type on Lipreading and Listening Performance and Implications for Sentence Processing.

Authors:  Brent Spehar; Stacey Goebel; Nancy Tye-Murray
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.

Authors:  C V Palmer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-03

7.  Outcome measures in the hearing aid fitting/selection process.

Authors:  B E Weinstein
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-12

8.  Optimizing sound localization with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  D Byrne; W Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-06

9.  Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures.

Authors:  James R Dornhoffer; Ted A Meyer; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Auditory Training With Frequent Communication Partners.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Mitchell Sommers; Joe Barcroft
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.