Literature DB >> 25421407

A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies.

Willem B Verwey1, Charles H Shea, David L Wright.   

Abstract

Behavioral research has produced many task-specific cognitive models that do not say much about the underlying information-processing architecture. Such an architecture is badly needed to better understand how cognitive neuroscience can benefit from existing cognitive models. This problem is especially pertinent in the domain of sequential behavior where behavioral research suggests a diversity of cognitive processes, processing modes and representations. Inspired by decades of reaction time (RT) research with the Additive Factors Method, the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm, and the Discrete Sequence Production task, we propose the Cognitive framework for Sequential Motor Behavior (C-SMB). We argue that C-SMB accounts for cognitive models developed for a range of sequential motor tasks (like those proposed by Keele et al., Psychological Review, 110(2), 316-339, 2003; Rosenbaum et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9(1), 86-102, 1983, Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 710-725, 1986, Psychological Review, 102, 28-67, 1995; Schmidt, Psychological Review, 82(4), 225-260, 1975; Sternberg et al., 1978, Phonetica, 45, 177-197, 1988). C-SMB postulates that sequence execution can be controlled by a central processor using central-symbolic representations, and also by a motor processor using sequence-specific motor representations. On the basis of this framework, we present a classification of the sequence execution strategies that helps researchers to better understand the cognitive and neural underpinnings of serial movement behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25421407     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0773-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  172 in total

1.  A comparative fMRI study of cortical representations for thermal painful, vibrotactile, and motor performance tasks.

Authors:  P A Gelnar; B R Krauss; P R Sheehe; N M Szeverenyi; A V Apkarian
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations.

Authors:  D B Willingham; L A Wells; J M Farrell; M E Stemwedel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

3.  Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task.

Authors:  M Ziessler; D Nattkemper
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Internal vs external generation of movements: differential neural pathways involved in bimanual coordination performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback.

Authors:  Filiep Debaere; Nicole Wenderoth; Stefan Sunaert; Paul Van Hecke; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Distributed planning of movement sequences.

Authors:  A Garcia-Colera; A Semjen
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Decreased load on general motor preparation and visual-working memory while preparing familiar as compared to unfamiliar movement sequences.

Authors:  Elian De Kleine; Rob H J Van der Lubbe
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Behavioral interpretations of intrinsic connectivity networks.

Authors:  Angela R Laird; P Mickle Fox; Simon B Eickhoff; Jessica A Turner; Kimberly L Ray; D Reese McKay; David C Glahn; Christian F Beckmann; Stephen M Smith; Peter T Fox
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  On the development of procedural knowledge.

Authors:  D B Willingham; M J Nissen; P Bullemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Motor control of serial ordering of speech.

Authors:  P F MacNeilage
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Instant attraction: immediate action-effect bindings occur for both, stimulus- and goal-driven actions.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Alexander Heinemann; Roland Pfister
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-25
View more
  32 in total

1.  Fluid intelligence and working memory support dissociable aspects of learning by physical but not observational practice.

Authors:  Dace Apšvalka; Emily S Cross; Richard Ramsey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-05-14

2.  Sequence learning is driven by improvements in motor planning.

Authors:  Giacomo Ariani; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Bimanual coordination patterns are stabilized under monitoring-pressure.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Inchon Park; Jing Chen; David L Wright; Ranjana K Mehta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Preparation of timing structure involves two independent sub-processes.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua; Stuart T Klapp; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-05-31

5.  Effects of auditory feedback on movements with two-segment sequence and eye-hand coordination.

Authors:  Miya K Rand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Investigation of timing preparation during response initiation and execution using a startling acoustic stimulus.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Unitization of route knowledge.

Authors:  Yaakov Hoffman; Amotz Perlman; Ben Orr-Urtreger; Joseph Tzelgov; Emmanuel M Pothos; Darren J Edwards
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-27

8.  Temporal and kinematic consistency predict sequence awareness.

Authors:  Molly J Jaynes; Marc H Schieber; Jonathan W Mink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Inverting the planning gradient: adjustment of grasps to late segments of multi-step object manipulations.

Authors:  Hanna Mathew; Wilfried Kunde; Oliver Herbort
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Motor sequence awareness is impaired in dystonia despite normal performance.

Authors:  Molly J Jaynes; Jonathan W Mink
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 10.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.