Literature DB >> 31100547

Fluid intelligence and working memory support dissociable aspects of learning by physical but not observational practice.

Dace Apšvalka1, Emily S Cross2, Richard Ramsey3.   

Abstract

Humans have a remarkable ability to learn by watching others, whether learning to tie an elaborate knot or play the piano. However, the mechanisms that translate visual input into motor skill execution remain unclear. It has been proposed that common cognitive and neural mechanisms underpin learning motor skills by physical and observational practice. Here we provide a novel test of the common mechanism hypothesis by testing the extent to which certain individual differences predict observational as well as physical learning. Participants (N = 92 per group) either physically practiced a five-element key-press sequence or watched videos of similar sequences before physically performing trained and untrained sequences in a test phase. We also measured cognitive abilities across participants that have previously been associated with rates of learning, including working memory and fluid intelligence. Our findings show that individual differences in working memory and fluid intelligence predict improvements in dissociable aspects of motor learning following physical practice, but not observational practice. Working memory predicts general learning gains from pre- to post-test that generalise to untrained sequences, whereas fluid intelligence predicts sequence-specific gains that are tied to trained sequences. However, neither working memory nor fluid intelligence predict training gains following observational learning. Therefore, these results suggest limits to the shared mechanism hypothesis of physical and observational learning. Indeed, models of observational learning need updating to reflect the extent to which such learning is based on shared as well as distinct processes compared to physical learning. We suggest that such differences could reflect the more intentional nature of learning during physical compared to observational practice, which relies to a greater extent on higher-order cognitive resources such as working memory and fluid intelligence.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluid intelligence; Individual differences; Observational learning; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31100547      PMCID: PMC6711769          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  60 in total

Review 1.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Cognitive, perceptual-speed, and psychomotor determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition.

Authors:  P L Ackerman; A T Cianciolo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2000-12

Review 3.  Learning and production of movement sequences: behavioral, neurophysiological, and modeling perspectives.

Authors:  Bradley J Rhodes; Daniel Bullock; Willem B Verwey; Bruno B Averbeck; Michael P A Page
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005).

Authors:  Michael J Kane; David Z Hambrick; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Working memory and intelligence: the same or different constructs?

Authors:  Phillip L Ackerman; Margaret E Beier; Mary O Boyle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Sequence learning by action, observation and action observation.

Authors:  Geoffrey Bird; Magda Osman; Anna Saggerson; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2005-08

7.  The Cinderella of psychology: the neglect of motor control in the science of mental life and behavior.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2005 May-Jun

8.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and learning: evidence from the serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

9.  The role of working memory in motor learning and performance.

Authors:  J P Maxwell; R S W Masters; F F Eves
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2003-09

10.  Motor learning by observing.

Authors:  Andrew A G Mattar; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.