Literature DB >> 27614459

Investigation of timing preparation during response initiation and execution using a startling acoustic stimulus.

Dana Maslovat1, Romeo Chua2, Ian M Franks2.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine the processes involved in the preparation of timing during response initiation and execution through the use of a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS). In Experiment 1, participants performed a delayed response task in which a two key-press movement was to be initiated 200 ms after an imperative signal (IS) with either a short (200 ms) or long (500 ms) interval between key-presses. On selected trials, a SAS was presented to probe the preparation processes associated with the initiation delay and execution of the inter-key interval. The SAS resulted in a significant decrease in the initiation time, which was attributed to a speeding of pacemaker pulses used to time the delay interval, caused by an increased activation due to the SAS. Conversely, the SAS delayed the short inter-key interval, which was attributed to temporary interference with cortical processing. In Experiment 2, participants performed a 500-ms delayed response task involving two key-presses 200 ms apart. In this condition, the SAS resulted in significantly decreased initiation time and a delayed inter-key interval (p = .053). Collectively, these results support a different timeline for the preparation of the delay interval, which is thought to be prepared in advance of the IS, and the inter-key interval, which is thought to be prepared following the IS. This conclusion provides novel information with regard to timing preparation that is consistent with models in which response preparation, initiation, and execution are considered separate and dissociable processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delayed response; Response preparation; Startle; Time estimation; Timing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27614459     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4774-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

Review 1.  What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Interaction between startle and voluntary reactions in humans.

Authors:  Josep Valls-Solé; Hatice Kumru; Markus Kofler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A startling acoustic stimulus interferes with upcoming motor preparation: Evidence for a startle refractory period.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua; Anthony N Carlsen; Curtis May; Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2015-04-25

4.  A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Charles H Shea; David L Wright
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

5.  Corticospinal excitability is reduced in a simple reaction time task requiring complex timing.

Authors:  Michael Kennefick; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Recovery of motor performance following startle.

Authors:  R I Thackray; R M Touchstone
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1970-02

Review 7.  Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Dana Maslovat; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; J C Rothwell; F Goulart; G Cossu; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Motor programming when sequencing multiple elements of the same duration.

Authors:  Curt E Magnuson; Donald A Robin; David L Wright
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.328

10.  Motor cortex inhibition induced by acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Andrea A Kühn; Andrew Sharott; Thomas Trottenberg; Andreas Kupsch; Peter Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  1 in total

1.  Response preparation and execution during intentional bimanual pattern switching.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Michael J Carter; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.